Introducing, the all new 2017 Giulia. From Alfa Romeo.
Did the quattroformaggi get mods yet? Tuning houses seem to not want to touch it
>>16861680
Why the hell would you even want more than 500hp?
>>16861680
Difficult when only 4 people have actually bought the car
>>16862060
To be only twice as slow as a Model S instead of 2.2x as slow. Of course acceleration rates aren't linear so that's a bit unfair to the Model S, which in practical terms is about 3x as fast for not much more money.
>>16861605
I see what you did there. Mazda 6 is an alright machine but the driving dynamics are different to the guilia, for obvious reasons.
>>16862127
the Giulia looks like the new Mazda 6 with a melting front end.
>>16862060
Lol doesn't it not even break 400hp on the dyno?
>>16862413
>>16862427
Pathetic. That's 10 year old Dodge Charger power.
Holy kek that guy looks like a huge fagget
>>16862127
>>16862138
>>16861605
this is a mazda 3 in the pic fwiw
>>16862477
no its alfa romeo giulia
>>16861605
Beautiful...
>>16861605
Tony does it again!
:^)
:^)
>:^)
>>16864085
the noticeable difference is that the Mazda is an unreliable piece of shit
>>16864097
>alfa is reliable
>>16864097
*isn't
>>16861680
>>16862060
>>16862105
>what is google?
https://www.autoevolution.com/news/pogea-racing-tunes-the-2017-alfa-romeo-giulia-quadrifoglio-to-612-ps-and-750-nm-115535.html
>>16864097
Unspeakable levels of delusion tony
>>16864123
>JD meme
>dependability (never specified what it is)
THE CUPHOLDERS ARE TOO TINY FOR MY 2 GALLONS DIET COKE
>>16864112
I still don't know what PS is.
>>16864134
That was specifically isolated for powertrain only you idiot, look at the top right.
>>16864123
what an absolutely useless chart.
>>16864158
>powertrain is useless
>>16862105
>Difficult when only 4 people have actually bought the car
Lmao dude, just in my backwater eastern european shithole they sold two dozen+ quadrifoglios this year, where the fuck do you live?
>>16864139
PhotoShop
or
603 hp, only with ECU reprogramming without touching/replacing the oem hardware.
>>16864148
Yeah, this includes even
>MUH ENGINE DRINKS A LOT (because I can't operate the gearbox)
>+1 points on jdmeme
>>16864208
What the fuck are you even talking about?
>>16864216
LOOK I HAVE ANOTHER CHART
>>16864216
If his favorite car (that he hasn't driven and will never own) does poorly on a reliability ranking it's because of irrelevant factors. If it does well on any chart it's on it's own merit though, of course.
>>16864097
>unreliable piece of shit
what does he mean by this?
>>16864235
yet you don't understand how these charts (((works))).
They're based on memes, not facts.
If you want some real data check insurance companies charts, based on real cases.
>>16864247
>insurance companies charts
Why would an insurance company have data on new car reliability, 100% of which are covered under manufacturer warranty?
>>16861605
getting an old alfa156 from 2002 with new belt
What do you guys think?
>>16864097
>>alfa more reliable than Mazda
>>16864318
I don't know man...
>>16868522
why so sceptic?
120.000km, 2002
I hoped it would be a good deal
Holy shit
Great job Alfa!