Sedan vs. station wagon

If it has to have 4 doors I'd rather have the extra utility of the space in the back. It's nice being able to carry bikes without a rack or have a comfy place to sleep.

>>16857865
/thread

pls delet

>Plus the aerodynamics are better.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but on most vehicles of identical make and model, aren't the station wagons generally more aerodynamic than the sedans due to the long, flat roof compared to the bumpiness of a sedan rear window and trunk?

>preferring style over functionality = woman

I guess it should not be surprising that the only place in the world to advertise testosterone enhancing products is the USA.

File: f73fda8f498b6037ef679ebbf23fbffe.jpg (8KB, 236x231px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 236x231px

>>16857940
>it's another teenage poorfag tries to feel superior episode

>tfw no affordable wagon with >250 hp

File: Screenshot (15).png (188KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1366x768px

>>16857937
As you can see, the sedan version of the Audi A4 has a cd value of 0.23, while the wagon has 0.26. That's because the airflow is smoother on the c pillar than on a hatchback.

>>16857971

>32
>Naturally /fit/
>Middle upper

Lol I even live on a beach.

>>16858061
Ja, ja, makes perfect sense, Hans, but when do we get ze gas bill?

File: 96-98_Honda_Civic_sedan.jpg (161KB, 2144x1180px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 2144x1180px

Anything is better with a hatch, apart from chauffeured luxury sedans where the extra sound deadening between the rear seats and trunk actually improve the car, or sports coupes where weight and center of gravity matter (and even those can be liftbacks if they have a front engine).

But if you buy something like a Civic sedan instead of a wagon you're basically a retard. Just because Rolls Royces are sedans doesn't make your shitbox sedan more prestigious.

File: 540i msport touring.jpg (387KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 1200x900px

no secret what i prefer in terms of both styling and functionality