Discuss

>>16857717
will never get to production

>>16857717
you couldn't put a little more effort OP? sage'd

>>16857718
It is

http://www.greencarreports.com/news/1109348_porsche-mission-e-electric-car-to-cost-less-than-panamera-sedan

File: IMG_0361.jpg (221KB, 1707x1080px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1707x1080px

>>16857718
""Wrong""
http://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/future-cars/news/a30192/porsche-mission-e-testing/

>>16857717
Ugly as fuck and electric cars cannot be sports cars.

>>16857717
will get BTFO by Tesla

>>16857771
>cannot
why? because they don't go "vrroom"?

>>16857788
Yes. And They will never come with three pedals and a shifter

>>16857809
lol

>>16857788
>>16857809
>>16857821
I think its just because they are too heavy with the batteries to be agile or nimble so they will never corner as good as their gas powered counterparts and the ones that do cost a ridiculous amount of money. No one has made a electric production sports-car under 100k except for Tesla with the "Roadster" but that was just an elise with batteries and it didn't handle as good as the lighter gas powered ones.

There was also an electric SLS AMG but that too was heavier and for the amount of money it would cost to buy it you could buy a regular SLS AMG and fuel it for the length of several united states.

>>16857809
>Yes. And They will never come with three pedals and a shifter
Why not?
To me, it seems that having a manual transmission on a electric car is ideal.
The clutch would last forever, different gearing is always helpful, and you don't really need a neutral gear since the motor can't really stall.