fwd "performance" cars

>>16827863
All the weight is on the front wheels faggot. And it's got a lip for downforce what the fuck are you talking about?

>>16827863
I that the new Subaru WRX?

>>16827863
http://tentenths.com/forum/showthread.php?t=39401

http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6092&sid=4971b9098fb13b89ce57df4117bd206d

>tfw this fwd """"""performance""""""" car is faster than the classic muscle cars

File: 2017-Honda-Civic-Type-R-rear-three-quarter-02.jpg (994KB, 2048x1360px) Image search: [Google]

994KB, 2048x1360px

>>16827915

wow, great threads thanks anon

>>16827878

idiot.

>>16827863
good front suspension, weight, lsd. not that hard when the cars are making 300hp and below

This is why I always strap a sandbag to my hood before a race.

>>16827979

you should just tighten your rear suspension, that's what's causing the traction loss anyway.

car takes off, weight shifts back, rear suspension compresses, front comes off the ground, traction loss, rear suspension rebounds, front end lowers, more weight = more traction, car takes off

>>16827996
So no suspension travel on the rear end on a fwd car=GOAT?

>>16828012

until you need to turn and you hit a pebble

>stiff suspension
Hey look, I fixed your problem.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMcN6SQrtcw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N81cEqZEDVQ

>>16828016
Turning is overrated. The only measure of a car is it's quarter mile time.

>>16828137
Maybe if you live in Cornland

File: 1389410876125.jpg (124KB, 704x480px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 704x480px

>>16828025
>that second video
This is just like my Japanese animes.

>>16828025
>that traction after the pass

Jesus, he handles it perfectly.

>>16828137
Found the dodge driver.

>>16828025
COOL VIBRATIONS

>>16827931
>he's comparing cars 50 YEARS apart

wow anon it's almost like the technology is different