Suzuki

>>16825168
Some nice little offroaders, some nice hot hatches, really reliable and cheap. Really like them.

File: downforceyo.jpg (36KB, 553x368px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 553x368px

>>16825168

Pretty based. I wish they were still in North America. Cheap, light and Honda/Toyota reliable without the rice tax.

good brand, no bullshit.

Can't justify buying a new suzuki over a second hand toyota though

>>16825168

the best Suzuki car is a Ford.
the best Suzuki 4x4 is a Chevy.

>>16825168
Cheap, light, fun, AWD option available on most. All good things.

the swift will be the perfect sporty shitbox once they reach prices of sub 3000€

Love my Mk.II Swift GTi. It's a no bullshit lightweight hot hatch with a simple, high revving engine. Add a turbo like I have with mine and you have a recipe for absolute madness: a short-wheelbase car under 900 kilos with over 250hp.

>>16825343
Which Ford?

>>16825168
Extremely under-rated, great reliability, great cars.
My personal favorites are the Suzuki SX4/Fiat Sedici, and the Suzuki Swift/Geo Metro.

>>16825168
They are cheap and reliable, the most common shitboxes here in Eastern Europe. Thouh they have a funny reputation because 80% of the old people drive 20 year old Suzuki Swifts with a shitton of dents and breaks fixed with duct tape. And they drive horribly.
https://youtu.be/uFBhXuzEM58

File: suzuki_cappuccin_7.jpg (46KB, 640x409px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 640x409px

Opinions on the suzuki cappuccino? I really want one but my friends say I should get something with more power. (Even tho the one I was looking at was a turbo)

>>16825726
A cute!

>>16825528

Gen 1&2 Taurus SHO.

>>16825726
Hayabusa Swap and nothing will touch it on a track

>>16825752
Wait, wut
What Suzuki was the Taurus SHO?

>>16825761
It wasnt. Hes making shit up

>>16825752
Those had Yamaha-developed engines and have nothing to do with Suzuki.

File: tmp_25067-1e7c8f237c55bd4a0accde68990ad37a1502928173.jpg (71KB, 736x552px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 736x552px

>>16825168
They make great affordable cars. But anything they make larger than the swift is shit.

File: 2016-suzuki-kizashi-29[1].jpg (98KB, 1000x562px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1000x562px

>>16825793
>2.4l 185hp engine
>good looks
>AWD option
>6-speed manual option

But then:
>AWD only available with shitty CVT

WHY
IT COULD'VE BEEN PERFECT

File: tmp_25067-10997625_715882171866289_2838263970434407842_o1534698614.jpg (74KB, 800x445px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 800x445px

>>16825818
Yeah like I said, if it's bigger than the swift, it's garbage.

>>16825785

My bad. Yamaha based.

File: vitara-main-xlarge-large_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqpiVx42joSuAkZ0bE9ijUnGH28ZiNHzwg9svuZLxrn1U[1].jpg (61KB, 720x449px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 720x449px

>>16825840
I'd say their SUVs are far from garbage, and they're definitely bigger than the Swift.

>>16825785

WHOOPSIE!

Is a AWD SX4 Hatchback worth it?

>>16825875
Sure. It's part-time AWD like Haldex, with one little difference: you can tell it to lock to a permanent 50:50 torque split.

File: tmp_25067-04SuzukiJimny-1916873619.jpg (508KB, 1700x956px) Image search: [Google]

508KB, 1700x956px

>>16825861
>car based SUVs
>ANYTHING but garbage
Yeah no.

>>16825343

What the fuck, there's nothing Chev in a Jimny.

>>16825907

Suzuki something/Chevy Tracker.

>>16825907
It was already proven he's an idiot

>>16825861

>Their worst SUV ever.

>>16825343

The tracker is all Suzuki bruh.

>>16825893
I'd rather have a Vitara than any other crossover, honestly. It actually looks decent, for one, and apparently it's almost as fun as the Swift.

Oh, and at least it's still somewhat capable off-road, unlike most crossovers.

>>16825893

>You can buy a SFA Jimny today

Probably the most underappreciated off roader ever.

Everyone keeps talking about the "samurai" when the Jimny is just that. But new

>>16825937
>The tracker is all Suzuki bruh.

And it comes in Chevy. Geo. Best ever. All time.

>>16825168
Well I like my SX4. Recently discovered that here in Norway Suzuki is driven by mostly old people. It also is a bit noisy inside, and the A-column blocks a lot of view.

Right now I'm trying to connect 3.5 stereo jack to the 14-pin cd changer port on back of the stereo. Sadly it looks like the data port cant be fooled by wiring, I need to get som £50 box between the stereo and my phone