>you may only ITT if your daily has at least 223hp

Why does your car keep slowly increasing in power? First it was like 217hp now this
Your ac delete and cai don't add that much :^)

File: Recycle001.svg.png (61KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1024x1024px

trash

>>16814729
>implying I was that low
>implying Im THIS low
im giving the shitbox owners a chance to participate in my amazing threads

File: you're a big president.jpg (50KB, 885x516px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 885x516px

>you bought a cobalt turbo instead of a GTI

>tfw 90HP
Diesel life

280 japanese hp

To the wheels or crank?

>>16814718
Supercharged S2000, probably about 400whp, going to dyno soon

>>16814754
>he has to ask

I have a old air intake on my 1.6 Miata so I'm pretty sure I'm in.

2000 GMC Sierra SLE 5.3l

285 hp @ 5200 RPM
325 ft/lbs @ 4000 RPM

thats probably what i get a the wheels

2003 lb7 duramax.
Efi live with full intake and intake and intercooler setup and exhaust setup. Gotta be pushing 400hp, right????

2018 jaguar xe 35t with 380 hp.

Cuck bois

File: DSC03220res.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

300 at the crank fuckboy

2003 mustang mach one

>>16814871
Nice tiny wheels, pussiboi.

Ugly ass front end. Only thing going for you is the rear.

>>16814903
>going anything larger than 18inch rims
shit taste detected, unless you're talking literally about the low profile tires then ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

However you're completely right about the front end being ugly as shit, if it was easy to improve I'd probably do it.

File: 1362711379442.jpg (50KB, 604x453px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 604x453px

>>16814903
>Only thing going for you is the rear.
only thing that should really matter no?

i mean in my limeted experience front shits tends to always get fucked up or sag

>>16814729
this is like those "you're with your gf at the club and this guy slaps her ass" threads. It started off with the guy being like 6' feet and 200 something pounds to him getting taller and leaner every time it was posted

>>16814948
Never understood those threads.
What kind of person makes them, and what do they get out of it?

File: 9d9b629ca5231ccfa9fe4025678f5a22e81dd55e45441aca46c7c494aa1f0c74.gif (929KB, 500x284px) Image search: [Google]

929KB, 500x284px

>>16814718
>tfw 675 hp

File: 00I0I_7eUBwfvWfG6_1200x900.jpg (167KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 1200x900px

258mhp/254bhp checking in

>>16814919
19" should be standard for a car your size in 2017 m8.

Even compacts Audi A4 jaguar xe and BMW 430i come with 19" as standard for premium trims. Xe comes up to 20"

>>16814980
20 inch is practically nigger territory for a daily driven coupe

>328hp
I'm safe from these threads for a long time.

File: 1463525939801.jpg (55KB, 790x682px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 790x682px

>>16814718
tfw only 172hp

[spoiler]but a power to weight ratio of 163hp/t[/spoiler]

I can still post in these threads if it's crank HP

>>16814966
Youre always in these threads, what do you drive famalam?

>>16814761
Do you recommend an 02-03 AP1 or the 06+ AP2 for supercharging? Heard claims the ap1 has better gearing and the 9k Ron gets you more pull, but the late AP2s have better internals

>>16814718
Keep waiting for it to get up to 450 to weed out the amateurs.
I'll be waiting awhile.

>>16815200
probably a hellcat

File: 1486768381156.jpg (48KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 480x480px

>385 hp
>doesnt matter because its a cuck truck

File: 6646d44afd39a73ee85831285a1f672c.3.jpg (53KB, 640x359px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 640x359px

I'm STILL HERE

TWO MORE WEEKS BABY

File: 1489100990198.jpg (83KB, 788x685px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 788x685px

>>16814724
>>16814759

>>16814871
>at the crank
who the fuck even uses that as a measurement

>>16814761
Didn't you dyno it when you tuned it? Surely your ECU isn't well-refined if you just road-mapped it rather than mapping it on the dyno.

>>16814718

375hp, 410lb-ft reporting in. Plebians may as well rid the bus with their shit boxes being so pathetic.

>>16815953
>he thinks 375 hp is a lot

>>16815954

Baseline. If you can't beat an R/T in a race, you're fucking slow.

>>16815908
Insecure people that need a bigger number.

>tfw 120hp and still faster than all your shit boxes

>>16815963
>need
except with 300 at the crank i still make enough to cover OP

>>16815983
bike?

>>16816004
Yea. '05 cbr600rr. Pretty hard to beat bikes for sheer speed for the cost.

>>16814871
My 2007 Toyota Camry shitbox makes 265. Your 300 is not that impressive

>>16814718
>He doesn't have 75+HP per cylinder
>He doesn't have 125HP per liter
>He doesn't have 130+Nm per cylinder
>He doesn't have 230+Nm per liter

Weak.

>>16816205
>driving a camry
cuck

>>16816205
>3.5-liter V6, dual VVTi, twin cam, 4 valves per cylinder. 268 hp at 6,200 rpm, 248 lb-ft at 4,700 rpm.
>only 248 lb-ft from a 3.5 liter engine at 4700.
>No low-end power at all.

Pic related is a 2.3 liter 4cyl with 260HP and 280lb-ft, the typical aero replacement ecu gives it 305HP, and 320lb-ft at 2000RPM

File: image.jpg (223KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 960x720px

>>16816313
Stupid phone didn't upload the image.

>>16814816
but the tork my dude. its the hand of god oushing you down the road

So no eurofags nor nippins can't post here?

>>16816205
260hp doesn't mean much when it's in a boat.

>>16815200
I drive a shitty Stage 3 Roushstang. Getting rid of it pretty soon.

>>16815481
Lol i wish.

>>16814749
350Z checking in

File: images (2).jpg (10KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 300x168px

Polo GTI 245hp
1.8 tsi
7 speed dsg

File: po3838-v1.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

>>16820440
Beter pic