Muh car

>>16792642

It's awesome, I have a 2013 one that I've been thinking about trading in for a newer Sport Tech model.

How do you like it? My 2013 one is lacking in build quality/material choices but I think they fixed that in 2015!

>>16792709
It's actually really great In my opinion. I have the eco model so I can get close to 40 mpg hwy, but when I stomp on it, it hauls (relative) ass. I think car and driver clocked the 0-60 time at 6.7 sec which actually feels pretty quick

File: 1481922261797.jpg (58KB, 625x590px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 625x590px

>>16792642

It's okay. Middle of the pack of the middle of the pack portion of the auto industry.

>>16792743

It is right? Mine is 7.7 I think, or maybe less, but it is very quick. Especially when cruising on the highway and you need to overtake someone, the power comes on extremely easily at 65mph+. Its only in the city it feels sluggish sometimes.

I have no problems doing 100mph on my commute daily though, it just keeps on going

Yeah it's pretty nice, I'm actually thinking about getting an ECU tune and adding about 40 who to make the car into a bit of a sleeper http://www.shopbtr.com/BTR-ECU-Tune-for-Hyundai-Veloster-Turbo-16-T-GDI-2013-2016_p_1615.html

>>16792803
RIP in peace 10yr/100k mile warranty you would need

>>16792642
GOREAN COPYING A SUBARU

>>16792813
Maybe lol

>>16792822
Looks better than a subie

>>16792905

Yeah, but then Subaru famously doesn't have designers or some shit.

>>16792962
Really?

>>16792962

Subaru has a 0.13% market share

they are basically a dead brand over here literally no one wants them

they haven't improved in 20 years

>same old ancient engines
>there has never been a good subaru interior
>bad resale value
>generally average reliability