silly audi idea

>>16784644
More than you can afford pal

Lurk audi forums not here. You'll get much better information

>>16784652
shown
dumbass who doesn't realize theres people who make more than him

how about someone helpful

>>16784667

word, thanks

File: DSC00543.jpg (570KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

570KB, 1280x960px

>>16784644
Super qwazy. Especially that piece of shit supercharger. I forget that name...something "dyne". MTM make a super charger too, for like $25,000. Lmao.

>>16784669
>he doesn't recognize pasta

>>16784682
i'm not around much

>>16784682
It's appropriate pasta. The cost of a supercharger is the same as a brand new engine....for like 100 hp more if your lucky.

File: 4547a2354p23423p.png (102KB, 785x757px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 785x757px

>>16784677
>>16784697

Wow is it like that for turbos too?

If I wanted a turbo installed on a v6 honda accord would it still be expensive?

Is it even possible? If so, who would install it?

>>16784746
Google your car + turbo/supercharger and see what pops up. My guess is that it will cost close to 10k for a basic supercharger kit that will probably increase hp by ~100 if you're lucky. If you wanted to go beyond that you'd have to start looking at an upgraded fuel pump, injectors, forged pistons and rods, clutch etc. Even then your audi reliability(lol) would probably tank.

I don't recommend any turbo setup because it sounds like you can't wrench and it would probably be more expensive for the same limitations of around 100hp on stock internals.

You're probably better off either finding another project, or looking into if there are any more n/a mods you could do like cams, headers, intake etc.

Turbos generally have the best packaging with inline engines because the headers are all on one side.