find me a more underrated car

is this sum turdburd?

File: mercury-marauder-15[1].jpg (3MB, 3153x1242px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3153x1242px

>>16781643

>>16781678
>marauder
>underrated

It's just a Vic with a bodykit and Vics are popular as fuck

>>16781684
>It's just a Vic with a bodykit
No, absolutely not. First of all, it doesn't even have a body kit. It has the same body as the Crown Vic. The only exterior differences are the exhausts and the wheels.

Look up the Marauder on Wikipedia or something. You've proven my point that it's underrated. Not many average people know anything about the car because it was made in such limited quantities.

>>16781684
The Mercury Grand Marquis on the other hand is just a rebadged Crown Vic with slight body modifications like different tail lights and grill. Maybe that's what you were thinking of.

The Marauder has a 302 hp 4-valve V8 from the Mustang Mach 1 compared to the 239 hp 2-valve equipped Crown Vic. The Marauder also has a limited slip diff standard, a slightly beefed up transmission, better air intake, and a nicer interior. It's like luxury-muscle in a sedan.

SHHHHHHHHH MOTHERFUCKER

DONT LET THE NORMIES FIND OUT

if you keep posting underrated cars people are going to start thinking theyre golden senpai

>>16781643

...pinto powered. With a taaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrbooooooooooooooo

>>16781698
>First of all, it doesn't even have a body kit.
Not him but it sort of does, it's got the "MARAUDER" imprinted rear bumper and the blacked out headlights/pre-tinted taillights. Always thought it was weird the Marauder uses more Crown Vic body parts than Marquis ones, though.

File: pontiac-6000-parts[1].jpg (53KB, 400x196px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 400x196px

You all know I'm right.