Porsche Panamera Sport Turismo official photos

File: Panamera Sport Turismo 2.jpg (348KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

348KB, 960x540px

>>16768496

>>16768496
>>16768500
That's a big car

File: banamera.jpg (104KB, 440x245px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 440x245px

>>16768581
4u

File: Panamera Sport Turismo 4.jpg (317KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 960x540px

>>16768581
I just discovered Panamera is just as long as S-class. I thought it's more like BMW 5 serie, about 4.98.

Thrilling!

File: Porsche Panamera Sport Turismo 3.jpg (467KB, 860x470px) Image search: [Google]

467KB, 860x470px

also its 4+1 seater now. Just like BMW 6 series Gran Coupe.

File: Porsche Panamera Sport Turismo 2.jpg (153KB, 860x470px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 860x470px

btw the most powerful version, Turbo S E-Hybrid with 680hp, will not be available with new body for some reason(idk which)

File: Panamera Sport Turismo.jpg (295KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 960x540px

panoramic roof
i have never been driving or been drived in a car with such roof

>>16768604
>4+1
>In a luxury car
To this day I still don't understand this faggotry.

You should either get 5 real seats OR only 4 seats if you've got a huge central tunnel like that.

Just use the space to store stuff or put some multimedia shit, whatever, but such a shitty seat is only good to torture the poor middle passenger's anus.

looks like a squashed Cayenne, I love it

>>16768630
>You should either get 5 real seats OR only 4 seats if you've got a huge central tunnel like that.
why have 4 when you can have 4+1 and extra suit for emergency cases?

>>16768630
>To this day I still don't understand this faggotry.
As far as I see it, it's for the ski hatch. Because if you're going to buy the Porsche wagon, you might want to have something long in the back.

>>16768630
>>16768635
>>16768715
update: you can have 2 fully divided seats in back as an option
also, Sport Tourismo will be only 4-wheel drive, no RWD options

also, announced 0-60 times are the same as with Panamera hatch

>>16768496

> 4 door porsche

stupidity

File: oldsmobile-station-wagon-08.jpg (29KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 480x360px

>>16768500

>station wagon porshe

autism

>>16768799
well it works. capitalism. porsche need money, people need a choice. s8, panamera, panamera wagon, e63 estate, ferrari ft - whatever you want

>>16768807
estate

File: 2017-buick-enclave-redesign.jpg (146KB, 772x644px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 772x644px

>>16768807
>modern America
>station wagons
Enjoy your mombombers.

>>16768811
>porsche needs
fix

any native speaker with A grade to approve my correction?

>>16768813
last time i checked, buick was SUPPOSED to make mommy cars and station wagons

File: wigger.jpg (175KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 600x450px

>>16768840

owned

>>16768496
I've unironically loved the Panamera since it was introduced. If I wasn't so set on getting a GT3RS I'd settle for it easily.

>>16769034
i used to hate on it because it was a generic bar of soap but within the last 4 years other auto manufacturers have gone so full retard on the angry face edgelord creases everywhere theme that it's legitimately the only company making okay looking """luxury""" sedans outside of MB and Jaguar.

>>16769128
It was just a refreshing addition to their lineup imo, it really neatly bridges the gap between the performance models and the SUVs.
Also it's something different from Porsche and while it's not perfect looking it's refreshingly... Professional looking? It seems like they actually took effort to make it fit into the lineup.

File: download (5).jpg (6KB, 287x175px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 287x175px

>>16769179

rare != exotic
exotic != desirable

> glad you showed up... I was getting lonely

File: treehugger.png (598KB, 785x380px) Image search: [Google]

598KB, 785x380px

>>16768799
not only this but

>>16768807

it's a fucking station wagon!!!!!
as if they didn't damage the brand enough by releasing a pigfat SUV.
the only thing they are missing now is a Porsche Mini or a Diesel/Hybrid

>>16769034
gt3 rs? really?

File: 1455021836729.jpg (41KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 600x600px

>>16768496
>it's a "Porsche's product line goes to shit" episode
I've loved Porsche since I was a wee lad, but I hate the direction they've been going in for the past few years.

File: xjsstationwagon.jpg (310KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

310KB, 1200x800px

>>16769604

Please tell me there will be a wagon version.

>>16769604
Eh? What're you getting at?

>>16769657
Everybody has a dream car m9, and I'll never be able to afford a basic bitch RUF.

>>16769671
uh, that IS a wagon you dumb yuro

File: 2002-lexus-is300-sportcross-new-photo-317935-s-original-photo-459184-s-original.jpg (45KB, 678x416px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 678x416px

>>16769673

> Odd hatchback-like styling on a sports sedan was not a recipe for U.S. success.

>>16769676
No arguments here, but seeing how the Panamera's been selling id say times have changed.

File: article-1087053-02761F41000005DC-500_233x193_popup[1].jpg (52KB, 650x488px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 650x488px

>>16769676
Why don't more cars use the hatch/trunk opening like on the Skoda Superb?
Seems like a fantastically practical idea to me.

>>16769671
are you blind

>>16769650
They already make the Panamera, Macan and Cayenne in diesel and hybrid versions.
Hell, their flagship million dollar hypercar is a hybrid.

File: 2018-Porsche-Panamera-Sport-Turismo-main.jpg (70KB, 658x439px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 658x439px

>>16769685

In case you did not follow the dots... the theme is "trying too hard".

>>16769705
>he would rather them half ass it
Find a better flaw tbf

>>16769692
it's a lot of parts to go wrong
surprised that skoda, the kings of no gimmicks, did it

>>16769736
The nice thing about Skoda is that they only add gimmicks that actually add practicality.

>>16769736
The Japanese could do it then.

>>16768496
>beautiful
about that

File: 1420828749690.jpg (49KB, 648x602px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 648x602px

>>16769704
there is a diesel already?!?

>>16769659
There is literally nothing wrong with Porsche's product line.

You can get both entry-level sports cars and the 911 in any flavor you can dream up, from barebones roadster, to grand-tourer, to track weapon. Changes to the engine have been forced by emissions regulations and unless you only buy Lamborghinis you can't single out Porsche for adding turbos and removing cylinders.

The Cayenne is the best mom-mobile you can buy from a handling standpoint, which is a safety feature if nothing else. Don't pretend you wouldn't have fun on on-ramps in a Cayenne Turbo.

The Macan is a swiss army knife of a vehicle for those in snow states and only underappreciated because car people on the internet like to sperg out about any vehicle that doesn't hug the ground.

The Panamera is a comfy wagon that also handles well and can go fast. "Enthusiasts" would love it if they could afford it, but they can't.

File: download (6).jpg (11KB, 219x230px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 219x230px

>>16769900

Drank the marketing Kool Aid, I see.

> Cayenne
A VW

> Macan
A VW

> Panamera
A 4 door porsche. And wagon.

whew lad.

>>16769674
>>16769695
It's missing the third row seats.

>>16770033
They made a VW that's faster than a V8 Mustang and can be customized down to the last stitch in the upholstery. At some point it becomes acceptable to call it a Porsche.

>A 4 door porsche. And wagon.
Those are both good things if you ever go anywhere with friends, not that you would know about that.

File: porsche-718-boxster-11-1.jpg (90KB, 750x422px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 750x422px

this car looks more fun

>>16770873
>4 cylinder vacuum cleaner
Just get a Vette

>>16770879
I was going to buy a gorgeous MR roadster by one of the most reliable manufacturers in the business, but thanks to this post I'll just buy a hideous GM plastic wedge with a truck engine instead. Should be much more fun.

>>16770305
what? fuck you burger, estates ARE NOT SUPPOSED to have 3rd row

File: s-l720438-620x413.jpg (76KB, 620x413px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 620x413px

>>16771193
Nigger go fuck yourself, Volvos and E-Classes have had third rows for decades.

>>16769900
You can't get the GT3RS with a proper transmission, though.

>>16771083
>MR as an actual selling point
Marketing truly is a magical thing.

>>16771219
Allegedly the 991.2 GT3 RS might get a manual option again.

>>16771219
So buy a 911R if you're such a badass that a 500HP RR racecar with PDK bores you so much.

>>16771231
>muh American heritage as a selling point
>V8 as a selling point
>"less ugly than the last one" as a selling point
>"it doesn't overheat anymore we promise" as a selling point
Marketing truly is a magical thing.

But seriously, at least MR layout provides some novelty that you can actual feel without doing insanely dangerous things on public roads.

>>16771219
>You can't get the GT3RS with a proper transmission, though
but it comes with the transmission they use in gt3 racing?
unless you mean stick shift, but why would you want to cuck yourself with an inferior gearbox?

>>16771210
...and they got rid of it. Becuase third row seats in ESTATES(low roof, basically sedan with big cargo) are useless.

And new safety regulations make it impossible to fit save chairs in the small trunk of the estate.

File: Huyhp94.jpg (164KB, 1237x847px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 1237x847px

>>16771311
Funny you say that because you can buy a new E-Class wagon with a third row right now.

>>16771325
>Seats facing backwards

Seriously what is the point of this?

File: 1455784841739.gif (1024KB, 184x141px) Image search: [Google]

1024KB, 184x141px

>>16771285
>tfw mr
>tfw traction for eons
feels gud

>>16771331
Far easier to get into. The alternative is to engineer second row seats that awkwardly flip forwards, or to leave away a second row seat to begin with.

>>16770319

Buying a wagon from a sports car company...

>>16771356
>reee people who have to carry things can't have fun

>>16771325
wtf?

okay

but porsche doesnt need ut