>supercharged AND turbocharged How can germacucks even compete?

>>16722045
>How can germacucks even compete?

By selling consistently more cars only because their brands only live of the glory of 30 years ago.

>>16722045
>How can germacucks even compete?

By
>Being RWD
>Not being 4000+ lbs
>Having more than 350hp

If the Polestar V60 was a T8 (so 415hp hybrid gasoline), it'd sell like hotcakes, despite the weight and FWD bias.

>>16722045
>no engines with more than 4 pots
SWEDEN KEKING THEMSELVES YET MORE LMAOOOO

File: pepe grab.jpg (63KB, 778x512px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 778x512px

>>16722106
>tfw no 5-cylinder supercharged turbo true mememaster engine

File: download (16).jpg (7KB, 255x198px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 255x198px

Driven the car 3 times now and decided to wait for the 2018 S4

The interior is pretty awful for a $62k car when compared to a 340i, C43, or S4. Plus I'd rather have a turbo six than some overboosted 4 banger on a 10+ year old Ford Focus platform

i thought vw pioneered the turbo+supercharger thing

>>16722045
>Implying twincharging isn't German engineering
>Implying Scandinavians aren't German

volvo sport cars is like that kid who wants abs but doesn't know what a diet is, no volvo people buy a sports car for the sound, thus a 4 cylinder engine won't be that good to compete against the c63, and fuel economy no volvo people don't buy sports car and care about fuel economy.

Polestars are the number one wolf in sheeps clothing.
They hardly make them though, not really relevant to their competition, that said id get one.

>>16722469
>no volvo people buy a sports car for the sound

I can't tell if you're saying Volvo customers don't buy sport cars based on how they sound, or if you're lecturing Volvo for neglecting how a car sounds.

File: Lancia_Delta_S4_005.jpg (495KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 1280x720px

>>16722431
Lancia was the first do it in the 80's with the Delta S4