2002 Accord Review

But it says 2003 Accord anon, not 2002 and that's a different gen

2002 Accord coupe looks far better than a 2003 Accord coupe

>>16713795
2003 model year, which would have been reviewed in 2002.

Would probably never happen, but to be fair, that generation with the V6 is really fun and decently fast

>>16714913
True, had one and can confirm. Ex-l coupe V6 with 6MT. Would have been an absolute keeper if it had rwd... I wish Honda would listen

>>16715137
It's a damn shame.