Would you ever get a V// over an ///M?

>>16702436
yes

File: 1487459613813.jpg (17KB, 542x540px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 542x540px

>>16702436
>buying post-1985 caddilac

>>16702436

I'd get a 6 speed CTS-V wagon over the majority of M cars.

File: 5630513806_e3cd4f8bab_b.jpg (265KB, 1024x636px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 1024x636px

I don't know, they only reason I would want V-wagon is for the practicality, but then I'd just might as well buy an E39 m5

Fuck yes I would.

>>16702436
I would get an E46 M3 over a ~2004 CTS-V, but I would I get a 2013+ CTS-V over a modern M3.

No but I want to buy a base equipped chevy camaro ss with a V8 and manual just to hook the shit out of it

>>16702436
>//
>///

>>16702463
>>16702486
Also this. I'd take an E36, E39 and E46 over anything Cadillac offered at the time. But I do like the look of the ATS-V and CTS-V coupes.

File: BMW_M2_BM4-01.jpg (162KB, 1268x650px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1268x650px

>>16702436
No.

M cars are top fucking tier.

Maybe, if for no other reason than because Cadillac still hasn't tried selling a fastback sedan, or god forbid, a crossover as a 4 door coupe, unlike the krauts
>reeeeees internally

>>16702551
They've got the worst kind of image tho.
>BMW driver: complete tool bag
>Cadillac driver: has a certain old-school American swagger.

Might not be true 100% of the time but that's the image.

>>16702436
>//
>///
Stop this shit autismo

File: Audi-RS-Badge-632x340.jpg (35KB, 632x340px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 632x340px

The patrician's answer.

>>16702585
>VAG parts car

>>16702585
>overpriced VW
>answer to anything
pls.

File: _88071437_dsc_0732.jpg (49KB, 624x351px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 624x351px

>>16702585
*tips fedora with equality*

>>16702579
Caddie drivers are grandmas or niggers. No other perceptive surrounds them.

>>16702551

What year do you think it is? M cars top tier? Cletus in his camaro are eating them alive. M cars stopped being "top tier" 10 years ago.

File: AMG-logo.png (64KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 1920x1080px

Fucking plebs.

File: IMG_20170212_163645~2.jpg (2MB, 3148x2357px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3148x2357px

I went with the V because I wanted to go fast.

>>16702747
>>16702585
>Le boring automagic horsepower computer

Well memed

File: ALFA-ROMEO-Giulia-Quadrifoglio-Verde-5465_8.jpg (724KB, 3000x1955px) Image search: [Google]

724KB, 3000x1955px

>>16702486
I'd take a Giulia Quadrifoglio over any of those pieces of slow hideous shit

I would take any V branded Cadillac from any year over any current BMW.

>>16702747
The All American City :)

>>16702831
Well shilled, Alfa shill, well shilled.

File: ragna.jpg (270KB, 774x488px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 774x488px

>>16702831
>alfa romeo anything
why would anyone do this?

>>16702907
>t. 7:48 at the ring
hahahahaha can't make this shit up
on the plus side, the M3 GTS didn't overheat like the Tesla, kek

>>16702926
You mean why would anyone not do this? I know only three answers:
>being a poorfag
>being a badge whore
>both of the above

>>16702816
>wtc
how much?

>>16702713
Well I seem to have different perception of them. Does anyone have a different perception of BMW drivers? Do you even?

>>16702551
lmfao let me know when they can touch a Porsche or an Alfa Romeo

>>16702944
>implying there aren't Alfa badge whores
Unless you live in burgerland it's seen as a prestige brand.
In my country they're dealt by the same dealers as Mercedes Benz and Maserati.

File: ATSV2.jpg (50KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 640x360px

>>16702436

I'd kill for any of the V///s

especially an ats-v

File: IMG_20170210_164019.jpg (3MB, 4640x2610px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4640x2610px

>>16702997
First gen V's are $13-18k.

The 2006 and 2007 are more desirable because of the 6.0 LS2 vs 5.7 ls6 and has a slightly stronger differential.

>>16702436
Before 2005ish ///M
After 2005is V//

>>16703158
I was looking at v1s before I bought my c5z. The practicality seemed great but I really had my heart set on the vette son ever even went to check one out.

>>16703184
this.

/thread

File: IMG_20170128_193742.jpg (3MB, 4640x2610px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4640x2610px

>>16703255
Good choice

File: atsvm4.png (974KB, 800x826px) Image search: [Google]

974KB, 800x826px

GM meme-tier cluster of an ATS-V vs. M3

Fuck yeah cunt I'd buy a VE commie.

>>16702436
As of late, I would take the Cadillac V//. Just seems like BMW has dropped the ball with this generation of ///M cars.

>>16702932
>M3 GTS
You are living proof that Alfa shills are literally retarded because you keep bringing up a car from 7 years ago
How fast did the fastest Alfa go around the Ring? in 10 minutes?

>>16705896
meant the fastest Alfa from the period (2010-2011)

>>16702585
/̸R̸ S

File: 2016_chevrolet_ss_ss.jpg (59KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 960x540px

>>16702436
Neither

>>16705886
Thats because Kia/Hyundai hired all of ///M's engineers

Of course! Want an ATS-V.

>>16702580
/////AMG
Ralli////// /////Art
Fフ

>>16702831
why did you post that ugly cheap shit interior

>>16706382
>ugly cheap shit interior
>projecting

>>16702436
fuck yeah, cts-v is my favourite becouse it's a big v8 and I live in yurop country infested with diesels and 1l shitboxes with drivers so stupid and jelaous they claim their car is better than anything american

>>16707377
>i let others dictate me what to think

>>16705922
The SS is cool but pales compared to the V//

>>16702747
This is correct.

Sold my CTS-V, now have a 650 supercharged E92 M3 and would never go back. AMA

>>16702436
Factory ATS-V<Factory M4<Modded ATS-V<Modded M4
In terms of the latest two generations:
Factory M5<Factory CTS-V<Modded CTS-<Supercharged V10 M5

>>16702451
>Buying post 1970 Cadillac
Look at this plebeian.

>>16705812
Kek at that layout. Muh speed is more important than my rpm. Enjoy your nice leisurely cruise down to the local bowls club on a sunday afternoon doing 20mph cuck faggot.

>>16710213
Did the opposite. Never buying BMW again, things are a myriad of problems.

>>16703184
>>16703274
Before 2008, M was superior. Then, the CTS-V2 came out, and it was quite good. I'd say that between 2008 and 2010, they were about equal.
In 2010, M had their first downsizing: from a glorious V10 to a smaller V8. That was the exact point where everybody knew M was dying, and it was open season for the best M5 competitor. Three years later, they downsized the M3, and then the entire playing field opened up for the best M3 competitor. BMW simply killed M in the name of fuel economy, while GM has let V loose in every sense of the word.

>>16710339
BMW has made the new M3/M4 less appealing stats wise but in terms of track performance M cars still come on top.
It's just that the gap between BMW and other brands has tightened, other auto makers are slowly starting to get the M formula

>>16702579
You faggots are so caught up on "image"

>>16710550
this I why I drive a beat to shit reg cab 4X4 that I spraybombed camo.

>>16702579
no, only niggers and soon to die boomers drive cadillacs

>>16703049
Mfw saw some alfa next to an r8 at a dealership and all I could think was https://youtu.be/vZLd81IHGQw

>>16702436
Memes aside, yes, but only under certian circumstances
M3/M4>>>ATS-V
CTS-V>M5/M6

>>16710213
I want a supercharged e92 m3

Are they constant maintenance whores like swapped turbo 335i's?

>>16702436
No, but I like to get V over my D!

File: 1470422983661.gif (4MB, 700x298px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 700x298px

>>16705920

>>16710521
No its more like BMW has diluted their brand whilst other like Cadillac and Lexus have stepped up to the plate finally.

BMW may still be on top in their M-cars, but there was a time when not only the M-cars but most of their lineup was a superior product.

>>16712511
>Cadillac
Subtle attempt to sneak that through but we both know Cadillac isn't anywhere near being on the same level as Lexus, BMW, Mercedes, or even Audi.

>>16712035
kek

>>16714165
Cadillac is past all of those

>>16710313
>caring about the Tac on an automatic transmission.

>>16702747

more slashes please

>>16716629
In terms of performance the CTS V is really good, it's on par with the M5 F10 Competition Package.
Only the new M5 will be released soon so Cadillac will need to update the CTS V
The ATS V is good but not as good as the M3 Comp. pack