Hey guys, try to prove this wrong

>>16686884
Toyota Prius. Proven Wrong.

File: 1974_amc_gremlin-pic-33111-1600x1200[1].jpg (326KB, 1600x892px) Image search: [Google]

326KB, 1600x892px

>>16686891
>good on gas
>everybody thinks you're a piece of shit for driving one

>>16686905
That's not a derivative. You need to reword your law or read a dictionary.

File: i97sQr_9[1].jpg (18KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 256x256px

>>16686911
You need to kill yourself.

>>16686905
Gremlins were shit on gas and they arent aesthetically pleasing either

how in the hell would it even be related to a Prius on top of that

>>16686914
1970's corollas look better than 2010's corollas

this thread is full of fail anyhow

'99 trans am here


>its not that b-bad

File: '75_Dodge_Charger_(Les_chauds_vendredis_'11).jpg (500KB, 1283x689px) Image search: [Google]

500KB, 1283x689px

1975 Dodge Charger

File: aaa.png (2MB, 1300x867px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1300x867px

>>16686884

mustang ii

>>16686926
Brougham was a mistake.

Also why the hell can you see the asphalt behind the car through the rear fender?

File: 10025.jpg (61KB, 634x347px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 634x347px

>>16686891
GM XP 883. the prototype the eventually led to the Chevy Vega.
It was a plug-in hybrid car built using off the shelf parts, in 1969. The car was shown around until the mid-1970s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_XP-883

>>16686884
Doesn't make any sense; that's a '79 Firebird, so is that the "aesthetically pleasing" one? And if so, which Firebird is the "unappealing" (spelled correctly here) one?