/o/tist needs to know

It's too low res.

Is that a VW polo?

its not a 918
mid engine rear wheel drive is better than rear engine rear wheel drive

other than that not really, unless you wanna factor price/cost to maintain but tbqh at that point that shit doesnt matter the same as it does with a lesser car

>>16670489
thank you!

File: IMG_1881.jpg (68KB, 800x640px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 800x640px

>>16670470
It doesn't sound good and the design is ultra-boring.

>>16670470
> German engineering
> Rear engine
> Poor weight distribution
Basically, the problem is that it's a porch.

>>16670470
its tiny

>>16670489
911 Turbos are AWD though, which is what he posted.

Also for the convertible I'd say chassis rigidity will always be worse than the coupe, and Porsche parts cost a pretty penny but shouldn't be a big deal if you can afford a 911 Turbo in the first place.
Other than that they're very reliable as far as sports cars and supercars go, and can feasibly be used as a daily driver.

>>16671525
Not really. And that's the first flaw I see in 991's.

File: Porsche-Boxster-Spyder-Rear-Back-750x500.jpg (84KB, 750x500px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 750x500px

Its not a cayman

File: P15_1261_a5_rgb.jpg (657KB, 2520x1680px) Image search: [Google]

657KB, 2520x1680px

>>16670470
>2017 911 Turbo S

>>16671513
> German engineering
Porsche is literally flawless
> Rear engine
More interior space, Porsche can engineer this layout better than anyone else after 50+ years of development.
> Poor weight distribution
Best weight distribution for traction and launching. Cornering behaviour hasn't been an issue since the 80's

>>16672647
50/50 is the best possible weight distribution for good handling. They made the rear engine layout work very well after 60 years of engineering, but it's still inherently inferior to a mid engine layout. That's why Porsches fastest cars (918, carrera gt) are mid engined. It's also why they have to neuter the shit out of the Cayman.

>>16672632
>posts a boxster

wew