please help me /o/

Honda Civic

>>16622362
lowest displacement civics that are easily available are a 1.3 and insurance is fucking crazy here so unfortunately not.

Nissan micra

>>16622419
oh come on now you're not even trying :<
a micra wouldn't handle half as well as a 106.

>>16622360
Are you fucking serious? Im 18, drive a 2 litre turbo and my insurance is not bad. 60hp is not even safe for highway driving.

>>16622439
I have no driving history and somewhat limited income. I'd be looking at 1.8-2k for a 1.1 (group 7 insurance) car.

Give me $150 for the 205 GTI in my backyard.
Figure out how to get it from Ausland to Bongistan yourself.

and also find out why it won't crank

File: se-vende-peugeot-106-sport-pack-14-75cv-buen-precio.jpg (84KB, 908x678px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 908x678px

>>16622448
You can easily get the 1.4 Sport for 1.5k or even a bit less. At least that has 75hp which is decent and comes with the GTI body. They are fun little cars.

File: phase 1.jpg (357KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 1600x1200px

>>16622483
oh it's not the price of the car, it's just the insurance that comes with it.
1.4 is group 11 and a 1.1 is group 7. I would if I could believe me bois.

any other fun to drive (very) low displacement superminis?

also phase 1 106's are superior in aesthetics :^)

File: oglas kumrovec bok.jpg (79KB, 600x399px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 600x399px

>>16622615
Well, if you can't get anything more powerful than that then 106/Saxo is pretty much the best option regarding fun. Really good handling, lots of aftermarket and pretty cheap to run/reliable. Phase 1 looks much better but phase 2 comes much more equipped.

>>16622658
thanks for the advice, much appreciated.