>engine is transverse mounted

why you hate the miura?

>>16588595
literally any modern car, are you like angry all the time or something?

>>16588595
>I like drivetrain losses!
>I dislike mass centralisation!
Stay pleb.

File: 1483755053198.png (12KB, 687x393px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 687x393px

>transverse V6
>Can get to the rear sparkz easily by just removing the PCV hose.

File: 12092009.jpg (132KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1024x768px

>>16588723
why not transverse straight 6

File: file.png (489KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

489KB, 640x480px

>changing foglights requires removing front wheels

>engine is longitudinal
>still have to lift it up to change the spark plugs
t-thanks Subaru

File: 1484951267099.png (135KB, 393x325px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 393x325px

>Fuel filter is mounted above the rear diff

File: Kdkwcyven.jpg (71KB, 960x950px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 960x950px

Transverse a qt

>>16588691
>I like uneven power distribution to the wheels

I'm sure high performance cars and race cars would use transverse engines if they were better.

>>16588774

That's because boxer engines are retarded.

File: 40853924[1].jpg (141KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 1024x768px

>>16588746
Fuck that. Transverse veeate is where it's at.