HELP!

File: DbKKzrT.jpg (33KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 400x300px

douchebag

>>16547824
Plz be serious.

if you're buying it new yes go for it
if it's used get a warranty
sell it when said warranty runs out because they're expensive to maintain

>>16547873
Thanks.

Lease it until the warranty expires and then drop that shit

>>16547937
>>16547873
Any interesting alternatives guys, maybe a mercedes s class?

>>16547946
Kek, why don't you just say the truth that you are broke as fuck and you can only afford a 15 years old corolla.

>>16547946
an s class would be expensive to maintain but it would still be cheaper than a RR
if you're keen on a luxo-suv that won't make you go bankrupt when something breaks try a lexus lx 570
cayennes are good,pretty reliable and can be owned by a normal human being after warranty but still expensive to keep them on the road

tl dr lexus or porsche

>>16547977
Lol no i am not roleplaying, i'm ready to go "stupid" with a new car, just not full retard.

>>16547978
Yeah I thought about porsche too because i don't like lexus that much.

>>16547946
Tesla Model S.

If you can afford an S-Class and a Rover, you should definitely go with a good daily first.

File: 2017-Lexus-LX-570-front-end.jpg (787KB, 2048x1360px) Image search: [Google]

787KB, 2048x1360px

>>16548026
if you're not a fan of how the lx 570 looks(no one is) get a last gen
they look so much better and they'll almost never let you down no matter how much you keep one
if you have to get something straight out of a dealership then just go with the cayenne

>>16548044
t. never been inside a tesla
don't listen to this post op

>>16548044
I am not in america so can't really use a tesla in a daily basis. The thing is that I want preferably a luxury SUV as a daily driver with decent performance and reliability but that seems like a tall order.
The only realistic choice I see now is porsche or maybe audi.

>>16548049
Yeah it's not really that easy to find this particular lexus model where I am for some reason, so I'll probably wait for the cayenne refresh this year and hopefully go with that.

>>16548055
Go with a Land Cruiser then.

Don't listen to this cunt >>16548049

The Land Cruiser is a much better value for your money.

>>16548064
they share like 95% of parts dummy
where do you live?

>>16548064
Unfortunately we don't have a land cruiser in Europe either, unless i can import one from germany.

>>16548074
Europe.

>>16548082
What country? I'll just assume you are in Central Europe.

http://gocar.be/en/car-new/Toyota/Land-Cruiser-Prado/150-Prado-TX-9-30L-Diesel-4x4-Neuf-s1bbv5lh?src=r

File: download.jpg (6KB, 298x169px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 298x169px

>>16548090
jesus dude no
that's a prado
not a land cruiser
this is a land cruiser

>>16547811
Lol enjoy your Tata owned crap

>>16548090
Greece.

>>16548103
T. Drug dealer

Get a lexus

>>16548090
Yep scratch that i'm blind, we have land cruisers actually.

>>16548098
Prados are cool too yo.

>>16548116
Aussie here if your a bogan dropkick

>>16548116
maybe
def not the diesel
and def not as cool as a LC

>>16548111
>>16548098
know the difference op
a prado is nowhere near as good as a LC

Land cruisers are not luxury though.

File: 435.jpg (123KB, 750x422px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 750x422px

>>16547811

From personal experience I can highly recommend the BMW 435i. It's fast, luxurious, handles very well, is comfortable at high speed, has modern technology, and it's pretty. The S Class is very nice as well. You get a lot more in the luxury department, but that's a whole other price bracket and not as fun to drive.

If you do choose to buy the Rover, do not buy one with high mileage. Rovers are the least reliable cars on the road. Listen to Demuro and get a warranty.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzQCj-dbgN0

Only g-men, gstrings,real g's, and grandmas drive luxury SUVs.

Buy a luxury sedan like a person with class and self respect.

>>16548133
Yes they are, they are only a few notches behind the Lexus counterpart, but it's still pure luxury.

>>16548136
Yes I am thinking of buying new, not used.

File: 1.jpg (138KB, 1024x640px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 1024x640px

>>16548143
In that case my only criticism of the Rover is that they're not a fun driving experience but girls like them so that makes up for it

If you don't care about speed, just about looks, and maybe you want to go offroading then the Rover is a great choice. However, if speed is somewhat important to you, the S-Class has plenty of power but still rides like a cloud. The interior lighting is beautiful on them as well.

>>16548162
Yeah I definitely like the rover more looks-wise and I do want at least one car that is able to go off road.
As far as speed and driving goes, these are factors but not big ones because I have plans to pair this choice with a sports car in the future probably a 911 but we'll see.
Although I agree that the s class has the best interior and probably the best ride as well, now if only it was a suv, that would make things much easier.

File: Land_Rover-Range_Rover_Sport-2014-1600-6d.jpg (415KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

415KB, 1600x1200px

RRsport is less expensive to maintain.

Drove an autobiography (supercharged 5L) for about 2 months in Germany, Italy, Switzerland, and Monaco

Pretty good although you look like a massive tool/douchebag

>>16549503
Yeah I thought about it, but it looks worse than the RR and performance wise it's worse than a cayenne from what I heard, although the svr version produces a wicked sound so it is worth it for that alone.

>>16548162
that interior is fucking disgusting.

if you want a fast luxury car, get a new jag xj. they handle fantastically and they look like pure sex