MR revival?

Because that's not how platform engineering works, let alone chassis design?

Not to mention most shit box econo cars have horrible rear suspensions.

File: 1459954677038.jpg (37KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 800x450px

>>16530773
Watch out guys, we got an engineering major here.

Fucktard, the read suspension would be completely different because it would now be the powered set of wheels.

>>16530712
renault did this

File: mgf-12.jpg (13KB, 564x273px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 564x273px

>>16530934
So did Rover
>rear subframe is almost identical to front subframe on a different, FWD, car
>front hubs still have half of a CV joint inserted

>>16531011
Desire to fit Rover 25 front engine and axle into MGF intensifies.

>>16531025
I don't think anyone ever did it, but there is no reason why it wouldn't fit, you'd just need a metro subframe to carry the engine and then it's just a case of cutting out the spare wheel well and working out how to get the throttles and gear linkages to work.

>>16530712
becuase they want CURRENT YEAR bloated dogshit instead.

I think it could be doable cheaply.
>take gt86 platform
>use engine bay as frunk
>remove rear seats which were near useless anyway
>engine over rear axle
>leave suspension same up front
>similar body with a few changes, rear notchback instead of how it is now

Toyota tried with the MR2. People don't like snap oversteer.

>>16531259
B-but muh /o/ meme machine

The fiero sold well but never made any money.