Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: 2E45BE32-A521-4C66-8202-86CC7937F4DC-707-000000A3D07691DA_tmp.jpg (17KB, 429x262px) Image search:
[Google]
17KB, 429x262px
I've been lurking for a while now and now I need some advice from you guys.
I'm 20 and can finally afford to buy my first car. My aunt is trying to sell me her 2013 Honda Accord with 115k miles on it for $7k. When I looked up similar years and mileage $7k seems to be the average price.
Should I just got for it and buy it or shouldn't I buy a 1994-2004 Mustang instead?
A lil more detail on the Accord. I know it's a 2013 but I forgot what trim and i know my aunt has maintained it properly and shes a great driver so no worries about its condition.
Pic is just something i pulled from Google. The actual Accord I have no pictures of but it's black
>>
Should not shouldn't. My bad
>>
Bump.
Any advice would help guys. I'm an idiot when it comes to cars
>>
That's a LOT of miles for a 2013 car. Most people drive an average of around 15,000 miles a year. The car is less than 4 years old, so on average it should have 60,000 miles. On the bright side, most of the miles it has are bound to be highway miles, which are easier on a car than city miles. If you're debating between this and a 1994-2004 Mustang, the answer is this Accord, any day.
>>
>>16529684
>yfw my 2015 Honda civic has 64k miles on it
>>16529321
Yeah op get the accord. Mustangs are shit anyway
>>
>>16529321
I've had experience driving the 90's mustangs and they're not DD material. The mileage on the accord is high, but Honda makes good engines, so I'd go with it.
>>
>>16529321
no. just buy a civic for 3k.
>>
>>16529321
If you want it go for it. Its never gonna break down and if u take good care of it will last as long as you want it to.
>>
>>16529865
They're fine as DDs, the main annoyance is range.
Thread posts: 9
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1