2018 Mustang

File: 2018 mustang 2.png (866KB, 1053x749px) Image search: [Google]

866KB, 1053x749px

Source:

http://www.onenewspage.com/video/20170116/6556724/New-2018-Ford-Mustang-V8-GT-with-Performance.htm

>>16500228
>lets take the current mustang and give it Down syndrome
Fords design team is fkn smart

>>16500228
Oh God I hope not, I think the 'facelift' version of whatever Mustang is in production was typically better than the original, but that is ugly as sin.

>>16500238
kek, had the same thought about downs.
Fucking ford, just getting uglier.

oh shiit dat a mazerati or sumin

File: 1484537848694.jpg (38KB, 384x673px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 384x673px

>>16500228
I didn't think they could actually make it uglier than the camaro

>>16500228
Cool Fusion bro!

>>16500228
WHAT THE FUCK DID THEY DO

>>16500228
Appearance was the only advantage the stang had over the alpha platform camaro. there goes that.

>>16500228
headlights kinda remind me of the current miata

>>16500375
>Prezo finally makes a good post

the back end looks great but the front

Is that a Lamborghini?

>>16500389
literally all of my posts are factually accurate newfag.

>>16500422
Kick his ass

>Buying any car of the 2018 model year other than the Model 3

Come on, now.

>>16500426
How much money do you have saved for a car, Solomon?

>>16500426

Still waiting for Ford's answer to the Bolt.

File: 268780_2e7578f222_low_res.jpg (107KB, 790x527px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 790x527px

>>16500228
Someone looked at how ridiculous the Camaro looked and said "TWO CAN PLAY IT THAT GAME!"

at least they left the rear alone... New edge and post 2010 fifth gen face-lift are still so far the best looking mustangs in my opinion.

>>16500441
That's not an answer, Solomon.

File: 1450407360157.gif (3MB, 417x468px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 417x468px

>>16500521
that's not my name. it's my channel name.

>>16500539
>I-I totally made up a random name for my channel!

>>16500461

2005-2009 <3

why does he look so sad.
who hurt him?

>>16500228
It looks like it has downs.

i think it looks great

>>16500545
idiot

>>16500617
BTFO

>>16500228
>Miata headlights

File: Behind-The-Scenes-star-trek-deep-space-nine-11760751-712-530.jpg (91KB, 712x530px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 712x530px

>>16500228
It looks like the 2016 mustang with fetal alcohol syndrome.

>>16501099
That was a great show.

File: 0_1-1978-ford-mustang-headlights_low_res.jpg (141KB, 750x422px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 750x422px

>mfw it's real
>"hey let's make the mustang less agressive"

WHY? IT WAS PERFECT BEFORE

>>16500228
[plastic intensifies]

File: 1474348355860.gif (3MB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 500x500px

>>16500228
>27% more DERP

File: 1480290367487.gif (1MB, 217x217px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 217x217px

>>16500551

>facelift looks like shit

Guess I'll wait til 2020 to see if the next gen looks better

>foxbody successor never

>>16501120

I don't know why they made the Mustang less aggressive looking. If anything make the fusion, focus, and shit like that less angry, but why make the actual fast car less aggressive?

>>16501415
It's like the SN95 possessed the designers at ford as revenge for replacing it with the New Edge

How did they fuck up so badly? I really liked this generation Mustang looks- wise. Seems like I'll just have to wait until the next generation when they hopefully use aluminum body panels and unfuck it's looks.

>>16500228
Whys it so sad?

File: 2020_mostong.jpg (93KB, 1300x747px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 1300x747px

>>16500228

ATTENTION EVERYBODY

EXCLUSIVE LEAK PREVIEW OF THE 2020 MODEL

>>16500228
I like it, but I wish the grille was smaller.

analphonsefaggot will defend this

File: XE_17MY_075_JDX_desktop_640x318_tcm93-210907_desktop_640x318.jpg (57KB, 640x318px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 640x318px

Are they trying to slowly nudge the Mustang into a new class?

>2035 Mustang will be an executive class sedan

>>16501506
>hood
>front end

holy fuck I think you're onto something.

Man wtf man

Execs were like "New platform in 2 years, just fuck that shit up."

I don't know, maybe it'll look better in another color, like that dark green Ford uses
Any word on any changes under the hood?

File: 2020 Maro.jpg (112KB, 1200x539px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1200x539px

>>16501469
>http://www.onenewspage.com/video/20170116/6556724/New-2018-Ford-Mustang-V8-GT-with-Performance.htm

At least it has better outward visability than a Camaro.

I still want to believe that 2018 is somehow fake, Ford can't be that stupid to approve that design.

File: nsfhyp.png (1011KB, 1057x747px) Image search: [Google]

1011KB, 1057x747px

>>16500426
Yeah, it's looking pretty awesome.

File: SmartSelectImage_2017-01-16-18-36-15.png (2MB, 1438x1839px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1438x1839px

>>16500228
Leaked source of the inspiration behind the face lift

File: 121b034dba3c2f39201a3fa9f782eb85.jpg (44KB, 736x595px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 736x595px

>>16501568
>V6 removed from the lineup
>V8 power increased to 465+ HP
>spoiler, magneride, open and closed exhaust and other options are included in the new performance pack
>GT350 gets updated
>GT350R gets updated
>GT500 coming in 2018
>twin turbo Ecoboost V6 hybrid already confirmed for 2020 model
Am I missing anything?
>>16501506
I know. The 2018 version looks like a mix of a Jaguar XKR-S and a 2015 Mustang. I love it.

File: dreamworks_face.png (642KB, 502x644px) Image search: [Google]

642KB, 502x644px

They did it

>>16501669

And they drank Bepis Cola while designing

File: 1483751339651.jpg (51KB, 539x539px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 539x539px

>>16500244
>>16500368
>>16500375
>>16501120
>>16501275
>>16501453
>>16500238

>People freaking out, acting like the current mustang is actually good looking

Looks like a fat focus

>>16501728
which it basically is

File: 1357046192-hidamarisk-o.jpg (105KB, 1440x810px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 1440x810px

>>16500228
W I D E

>>16500228
What's with the green tires?

>>16501469
>>16501575
>HURRR
lmao does this stuff happen only on /o/?

>>16501506
already have the mondeo for that, just needs a upclass it a bit

File: arrow coupe.jpg (73KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1024x768px

>/o/ doubting fords retardation
this was a real concept btw

>>16504453
I was not aware the old C-Class Coupe had a downie cousin.

File: benis.jpg (34KB, 658x464px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 658x464px

>>16501702

>designers face when

File: 1473587472104.png (9KB, 205x246px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 205x246px

>>16500228

>>16500228
Other than the little sideburn looking running lights what changed?

>>16504453
Looks sick

File: 1484334428888.jpg (29KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 500x500px

>>16504727

File: 2011_ford_mustang_gt_05.jpg (188KB, 1200x803px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1200x803px

Best looking modern Mustang was the 2010-2012 ones desu.

>>16500228
OH LOOK ITS THIS THREAD AGAIN

SAME PICTURE AND EVERYTHING


GUESS OP JUST HAD TO GET MORE REPLYS

File: IMG_1519.jpg (17KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x360px

>>16500228

File: 1396325519012.png (77KB, 267x200px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 267x200px

WTF Ford

That looks fucking stupid

File: gallery-1484594296-new-ford-mustang-v8-gt-with-performace-pack-in-orange-fury-2.jpg (351KB, 1600x800px) Image search: [Google]

351KB, 1600x800px

It looks amazing. You guys are crazy.

>already facelift

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH

fordcucks will defend this

>>16500238

Every one of their retro styled Mustangs look like they have downs. It just changes in the level of subtlety.

>>16500375

If you're buying a modern pony car for looks, you aren't getting a Camaro or Mustang.

Has there ever been a good 'facelift' on any car in recent years? They always take a car and give it down syndrome and tacky LEDs

>>16505209
It does look better in that color tBh

>>16505209
That looks better, I'll wait till I see one in person to judge it but so far I'm happy I got a 15 style wise.

>>16500228
God damn it ford ya ruined it

File: Ford-Mustang_GT-2018-1600-14.jpg (276KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 1600x1200px

>Ford Press Release

>Literally no changes at the rear.

>>16505416
>redesigned taillights
pics?

File: Ford-Mustang_GT-2018-1280-09.jpg (113KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1280x960px

>>16505421
Forgot pic.

File: Ford-Mustang_GT-2018-1280-0c.jpg (199KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1280x960px

>>16505422

File: Ford-Mustang_GT-2018-1280-01.jpg (313KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 1280x960px

In Dark Grey

>>16505423
>>16505426
>>16505421
Can't see any difference in the tail lights. GT350 quad tips are cool though and the wing look like a slightly smaller version of the GT350r wing

>>16505416
Impressive but that front end is a bulbous mess and most of the changes are pointless

Still I'm a poorfag who's not bitter I just think it's hood is too high and silly looking like a kike nose golem

File: Ford-Mustang_GT-2018-1280-04.jpg (180KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 1280x960px

In Silver

>>16505439
Looks silly that hood line is too high

File: Ford-Mustang_GT-2018-1280-0b.jpg (199KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1280x960px

In Blue

File: Ford-Mustang_GT-2018-1280-08.jpg (188KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1280x960px

>>16505446

>>16505209
5 cents have been deposited to your account.

File: Ford-Mustang_GT-2018-1600-10.jpg (121KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1600x1200px

>12 inch instrument cluster display

File: Ford-Mustang_GT-2018-1600-0d.jpg (301KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 1600x1200px

>>16505455

>>16505416
>aka things that no one asked for

>best selling sports coupe in the world
Stay salty /o/.

>>16505455
that looks amazing. can't wait to see it in person

>>16505467
Better ride and more power.
>things no one wants

Please tell me that the fucking hood bulge isn't back- I can't quite tell from the pictures. Getting rid of it was the best thing about the s550.

>>16505491
As if it was any better.

>>16505426
(((GT)))
>/pol/ memes on cars

>>16505432
>>16505439
>>16505446

I can't believe how big of a difference color makes. Yellow makes it look like it has downs, but in silver or blue, it actually doesn't look that bad. Dark Grey looks pretty good desu.

>>16505423
Quad exhaust
>Muhdick.jpg

>>16505446
Looks best in blue

>>16505446
>>16500228
Mustang has FAS now managed to make it look even uglier

>>16501568
Didn't they discontinue guard green? Kek

>>16505209
that looks super good. the thing is youll see 30 of these on your commute to work and ruin the specialness of it.

>doesnt matter to most people, just an opinion

It's just keeps melting and bean-ing. Looks like shit.

File: image.png (344KB, 433x419px) Image search: [Google]

344KB, 433x419px

>>16500228
GAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

WHAT THE FUCK

File: image.jpg (107KB, 433x419px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 433x419px

>>16506131
NO

Another thing about Ford designers is that every time they release a new facelift or model, it completely shits on the old one, making it age terribly.

File: image.png (228KB, 433x419px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 433x419px

>>16506144
RECOVERY


B T F O

>>16505559
lol'd

>>16501691
>465+ HP

You literally pulled that out your ass. They haven't announced a HP increase and odds are it will have less HP than the camaro like it always does

>>16506251
>less power than the camaro
gt500 says hi

>they haven't announced a power increase
see >>16505416

dumbass

>>16506146
Yeah dude, Downs is the future and only Ford knows it right now.

>>16505432
A poor man's Aston Martin , they finally did it

>>16500548
Best stang

>>16506679
Talking about the standard gt you fucking inbred. How retarded are you?

>>16506679
Also I don't see where that pic says 465 horsepower. You truly are your brothers son

>>16505455

Fully digital?

No physical needles?

Please be.

>>16506741
>a cheap tablet screen?
>no physical instrumentation?
>oh i really hope so!
Seems legit. Not preemptive suggestion shill at all.

>>16500228

>take car
>stretch it weirdly
>bam new model

modern car designing is truly ebin

File: 1475107437786.jpg (84KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 600x800px

>>16506718
What can we expect from a 5.0 Direct injected V8 with a 12:1 compression ratio? would 460~ be in the ball park?
>>16506718
according to cuckwrxfan it is listed as "available"
So im willing to bet it will be a premium model only option.

>>16506752
the person who made the screenshot was just retarded in doing the screenshot.

the car's proportions are identical to the pre-facelift and also looks ok in the video.

no car maker would go out and go through all the hoops to rework literally EVERYTHING while keeping mostly of the old look.

File: 2009_00077_01[1].jpg (186KB, 1024x646px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 1024x646px

>>16506703

I like how classic and non-aggressive it looks.

Almost cute, even.

>>16506762
>muffin button
>6 presses to open hatch

kek

File: 10000 hours.jpg (198KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 1280x960px

>>16506766

its too fucking fat

>>16506762
Until ford announces the HP it's still stuck at 430. You may as well assume it will be 500 HP because both numbers come out your ass

Looks like a Ford Fusion lol.

File: 1435689279056.png (415KB, 1000x1400px) Image search: [Google]

415KB, 1000x1400px

>>16506861
Ass mad gm fan girl detected:^)

>>16505209
the lights look off

File: all-new-2018-mustang-0.jpg (238KB, 1280x978px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 1280x978px

>>16506882
it looks less autistic in darker colors

>>16505209

>That subtle GT-R wing
>That wannabe F type coupe fascia
>Headlights slowly moving it's way down the side of the car

Honestly this is something I'd expect to see in a transformers movie not a production car

>>16506881
GM can suck a dick. It's dealers are full of scumbags. Trust me I know. I plan on getting either a bmw m240i or the 2018 mustang GT. But for you to throw out random numbers and say they are fact is fucking retarded

>>16500568
I think you look great.

File: 1386885366392.jpg (36KB, 500x371px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 500x371px

>>16506964
anon i wasn't the anon that was pulling numbers out of his ass. Im just curious what all this new tech 5.0 can be expected to put out

>>16500228
Every single new mustang design has been hated when it came out since after 67, but once it's around for a while we start to like it. I hate this car, after a year or two I'll probably like it

>>16506762
460 sounds about right
But then Chebby will give the corvette tune to the camaro

>>16505455
>Gear 7
>2500 RPM
>55 mph
wat

>>16505423
>>16505426

Hopefully I can install this wing on my future 2016 GT.

>>16507068
10 speed auto ratios most likely

>>16507068
>getting an auto in a mustang

Thats your first mistake

>>16500228
Anyone else getting Jaag XK vibes here?
Also the rear does look better. I like that a lot.

File: f type.jpg (59KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1280x720px

>>16506902
I'm getting serious jaguar F Type vibes from this thing

>>16505074
You have no taste.
These cars looked like crap when they were new.
It's no wonder the Camaro was such a hit then

File: 2018mustanggt.jpg (307KB, 1700x956px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 1700x956px

>>16500228

File: unnamed (1).jpg (75KB, 1280x854px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1280x854px

>>16500548
Here's mine. Saved up for a first car, wanted a '99 STi impreza (all rallied out), parents shut me down. Gave me the option between a Subaru Crosstrek and this.

>I hated it at first but I'm starting to actually love it.

>>16507100
That's probably because that *is* an f type

>>16500430

>2018
>having less then 200 hp in your car

Cool shitbox bro

>>16507165
are we talking whp or at the crank desu

>>16506710
stay btfo

>>16507098
rear looks great, new factory wing looks good for once, quad exhaust looks/sounds awesome.

>>16507165

preferable to the wheel, but mazda3 doesn't even have 200 at crank.

hell the top trim mazda3 only has 10 more hp then the base trim kia Forte.

>>16500228
>A fat Miata

>>16507156
The mustang or the picture of the F type I used to show the similarities in the silhouette?

>>16505209
Personally the fascia isnt too bad. But the headlights? Like that shit looks dumb as fuck

>>16505416
>10 speed automatic

lord

I like it better than the current one. the slight front redesign looks less like a fusion now.

I actually kind of like it

>>16507183
>New 2018 mustang is still slower than a 2016 Camaro
But hurt ford fan boy

I think the bumper is an improvement. The headlights look a little odd, but I can see them growing on me. The work they needed the most was on the rear, and it looks like they did none.

>>16507414
it isn't though.

File: 1375406769238.jpg (37KB, 429x410px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 429x410px

>>16500228
Finally doing away with that ugly "muscle car" look.

It looks almost decent now.

>>16505432
Literally an uglier Jaguar

>>16505432
>>16505439

This looks OK in a dark color and at that angle

>>16505416
>literally giving it all the options the camaro had

Ford is finally catching up
Im seriously thinking about buying one in that magnetic color or buying a camaro in any random color

>>16501721
You're right, it's not, but this is a step down.

can someone post a pic with all the modern mustangs. I think 14-15 was my favorite not sure though

>>16505209
Front lights look like dodge ram lights tbqh

File: 2011-ford-mustang-GT-front-three-quarter-burnout.jpg (210KB, 750x469px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 750x469px

How did we go from this (pic related) to a weird, disproportionate, overdesigned Euro luxobarge looking thing in such a short span of time?

Ford needs new designers. The new Fiesta looks like a Kia, it doesn't even have the defining vertical tail lights anymore.

>>16507737

This

>"We want the Dodge Charger Audience"
>"Say no more"

>>16505074
Literally wtf? I have an '08, so I really mean this: It has all the ugly qualities of the 05-09 and removed the one good part, the front fascia.

File: 00202_kfG03VrRGV0_1200x900.jpg (82KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1200x900px

>>16505209
I understand now, they stole the shape of the Charger headlights. That's why it looks different.

>>16507765
>>16507782
>>16507783
kys

>>16507783
>>16507769
>>16507737
Holy shit: can't unsee

>>16507765
Safety requirements, emission requirements, bringing it to Europe.

>>16500228

>meanwhile at Ford

ayo hol up what if we make the grille bigger and headlights more squinty?

>>16500228
>people keep complaining our mustangs look like they have downs
>let's make it look even more like it has downs

>>16505416
>All-digital display cluster
pls for no.

Why do car companies replace the high definition (see: real life) gauges with low res tacky clusters that try to mimic real gauges. Just put a nice display in between with as little shit gradient as possible and give me a real back lit gauge cluster.

>>16507765
The interior has been improved by leaps and bounds though, like fuck it's nice in the new ones

>>16507893
>The interior has been improved by leaps and bounds
So they're finally starting to catch up to German base models? Congrats. How about some more power, faggots

I'm prob gonna trade in my 2017 wrx for this,

VEE ATE
E
E

A
T
E

>>16507836
You can't blame everything on regs. The 2011-2014 would pass modern safety and emissions no problem.

>>16507765
The interior and exterior are both outdated trash.
They were when it was new.

File: Mustangs.jpg (173KB, 620x335px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 620x335px

>>16507717

15-17 you mean. 13-14 is its own look.
Bottom right is 13-14. I think top right is previous to that.

>>16508091
2015 looks so much better.

last gen mustangs weren't as good looking

>>16508100

I was in the market for 13-14 because 15 was expensive still. They do look bulky.

File: 2013Boss302_11.jpg (748KB, 1500x938px) Image search: [Google]

748KB, 1500x938px

>>16500228
Fucking why. How do you go from this to that abomination?

>>16508110
that looks awful

>>16504453

Was this an attempt at a USDM falcon?

>>16506793
I'll always love the looks of early fifth gens.

It was painful watching the fifth gen change year by year and the center grille get taller and taller, the outside lights get squarer and smaller, and the hood lose that classic straight, flat look.

>>16508091
top right is 05-09

File: 1479550796272.jpg (30KB, 567x522px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 567x522px

>>16508091
>looks smaller and slimmer
>weighs around 200lbs more
When's the mustang gonna start slimming down?
Going by this rate next gen is going to weight 4tons even

>TEN Speed transmission.

What the fuck

>>16508275
aren't 12 speed autos starting to be rolled out in higher end cars?
this doesn't even seem that bad

>>16508275

Codeveloped so both Camaro and Mustang use it.
Aint that some shit

File: Ford-Mustang-Mach-1.jpg (2MB, 3008x2000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3008x2000px

>>16501506
>>16505432
with its longer hood it reminds me of mach 1 mustang
>>16501691
>missing anything
tickford edition aero effects kit with barra 310t fg

>>16500228

I've owned Mustangs for the last 12 years- been a fan my entire life.

But damn.

2018's Mustang is full almond mode frothing-retard syndrome of a down.

Fuck.

>>16505209
wow it looks just like the last one

File: helpMeSee_logo_rszd.jpg (63KB, 500x154px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 500x154px

>>16500228
Please somebody explain to me why I see so many comments about it looking like a miata. I see ZERO resemblance.

>>16508418

I feel the same. Thankfully the next platform debuts in 2 years

>>16507480
Do you have numbers that actually exist to back up your claim or are you going to pretend the new Mustang has 465 HP with no facts to back that number not that it matters since the mustang weighs more anyway

>>16508813
>can you prove 2018 f1 cars will be faster than a prius
>there's no way to prove it
>a prius will probably be faster

>>16508901
They're probably going to be faster but you're still putting a claim out there with no evidence what so ever

>>16508901
oh you

>>16508744
It's the narrow grille and squinty eyes

>>16508114
You look awful

>>16500228
It looks kinda flat.

>>16508901
Nice shit post. Sad that ford fanboys can't admit something as simple as "we don't know what the HP numbers are"

>>16508902
>>16508907
>>16509491
found gm's marketing team

>>16505074
Agreed.

>>16509510
If you would of lurked the thread you would see I said GM can suck a dick and I'm deciding between a mustang and BMW you shitposter

it looks like a catfish

Looks like what chevy did to the camaro 3rd to 4th gen. Made it streamlined and more 'aero look' without really changing much of the actual aero profile.

Looks sort of like the ND Miata''s derpface in pictures did.

File: 1484438875177.png (158KB, 500x359px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 500x359px

>>16500228

they need to cut 15 inches of length and 4-5 inches of wheelbase from that thing before I'm interested

File: HAHAHAHAA.png (134KB, 404x405px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 404x405px

>>16500228
So how long before this guy gets his viewers to pay for his 2018 mustang down payment?

>>16509598

he already has enough saved for a gt350, but he's waiting to see if there's some bullit version or something

>>16509606
You mean to tell me he's already planning on selling the mustang that he just got with the money from his followers who clearly are mentally handicapped to get yet another mustang? He needs to change his name to CuckStang and his followers need to just be called cucks

>>16509606
wew
i bet that ford dealership loves him

>>16509550
I like the 4th gen.

>>16509606
Are you fucking kidding me? I gave him 500 bucks back when he was begging for cash cause he couldn't afford a car to buy the stang and now he's going to stab me in the back AGAIN after he already did? How do I file a class action lawsuit?

File: Camerah.jpg (94KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 900x600px

>>16501469
>>16501575
The future is now

>>16501697
got damb

>>16505432
The front clip looks hideous from the side look at the headlights

>>16505432
>>16505439

It's not exactly ugly, but it's still inferior looking. Esepcailly the whole lower portion of the front.

And the front overhang is so huge. Why couldn't they move the front axle up another inch or two?

>>16506793
These are ugly as shit. The original retro Camaro was way nicer looking, and even that looks bad today.
The best one is the '15-'17 models. They'll probably never top that look. They're the only ones that looked almost as nice as the 1969 Mustang.

The only thing the early fifth gen had going for it was the pastel paint colors that did look better on them than most cars.

Why do almost all modern cars look like SJW mobiles now.

>>16510241
Because that's who's buying them

>>16507876
I'm with you. Digital gauges are tacky and will look dated quickly. Analog gauges are timeless.

>>16509675
>How do I file a class action lawsuit?
Against your brain?

>>16510241
Because you're a /v/tard and/or /pol/tard who just buys into retarded hiveminds

>>16510241
because all their owners are so triggered right now
or to put it better people have no proper outlet for frustration atm

>>16509598
>>16509606
>>16509633
>>16509675
who is this and what is the backstory?

>>16500228
>slightly make it look less angular by rounding one line
Ford cucks: hurr herrrr HOLY SHIT!!!!!!! INSANE!!!

It looks retarded, literally

>>16500238
thought it already had downs

>>16505442
this so much

>>16510517
i've posted this once or twice, but i'll post it again

>subaruwrxfan
>cannot actually review anything
>calls everything nice so manufacturers still give him cars to review
>probably has parkinsons
>sells perfectly good toyobaru because of chronic autism
>buys mini which he promises is cheaper/reliable
>mini breaks down every day & he is too poor to do anything about it
>realizes that he is too fucking stupid to get himself out of this problem that he has created
>starts begging for money online to buy a """muscle""" car
>gets ecoboost mustang purchased with viewer money
>finally realizes that it isn't a muscle car
>goes & trades it in for a v8 mustang
>literally crashes the v8 mustang the first week he owns it because people with parkinsons turn out to not be very good drivers behind the wheel of powerful muscle cars

now apparently that stupid fuck wants to trade in his shit in AGAIN like he's done for the past few times.
i have no clue what he wants to do, & i'm not planning to give him more views to find out. i'm sure whatever he does though will probably be the worst choice possible, judging by his track record in decision making.

>>16501721
All mustangs from 2005 look like shit. 2016 one is at least decent looking

It'll get hated on just like the nearly every single other bodystyle does when released, and it'll grow on people just like nearly every other mustang ever has. It happens every time, just give it time and the haters will want one for themselves!

>>16507153
Was the flashing lights reference unintentional anon?

File: IMG_0309.jpg (217KB, 1152x514px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 1152x514px

Why don't they just go all the way back to the original instead of trying to copy the looks of the '69

>>16500228
Why does it look so W I D E

>>16511738
Lots of glass and the body lines are low. Modern cars look too tall.

>probably picking up 2016 GT with Performance Pack tonight
>Triple Yellow

Wew lad

>>16505416
>wanting a car with microsoft software in it
>actually paying a premium for it

>>16511859
it doesn't use Microsoft software

>>16511865
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Sync

>>16511871
>it literally says they stopped using it a few years ago
nice job blowing yourself the fuck out

>>16511878
It literally says it's an option. Which means you literally have to pay a premium for it.

File: Down SYNDROME.png (254KB, 473x635px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 473x635px

>>16500228
wow this really made me think

>>16511892
https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/news/ford-sync-3-announced/

Jesus... I thought it couldn't look any more like a shitty Audi, but here Ferd goes and proves me wrong. Same shit quality too, undoubtedly.

>>16511904
I guess I got told.

Out of the frying pan and into the oven, as they say.

File: c4dash.jpg (85KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1024x768px

>>16507876
>>16510278
What, you guys don't like the C4's digital dash?

>>16506855
Still pulls more on the skidpad than your shitbox

File: 87408d1258959010-s2k-cluster-into-ej1-ap1-ap2-better-ap2.jpg (41KB, 798x600px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 798x600px

>>16512375
By digital they mean full LCD screen
This shits sweet, i wish it went like this rather than full on digital screens

>>16510804
lol this is actually kind of funny. The guy sounds like a total retard and train wreck, but at the same time, I can't really fault him if it's that easy for him to get his followers to throw money at him.

>>16505455
>1964.5 mi
clever.

Hopefully the 6th gen will go down in price

>>16511407
Underrated

>>16512705
Both are bad. And you should feel bad for liking that shit.

>>16513958
>>16512705
You guys realize its optional right? SubaruWRXfan will probably talk about it after he trades in his Mustang GT for the 2018

File: 2014-lexus-lfa-tachometer-2.jpg (189KB, 1080x810px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 1080x810px

The digital tach in the is350 and LFA still looks fairly good to this day, except that the blacks aren't nearly a deep black enough.

It's just that cheap shit ones will look cheap shit still.

>>16505455
I'd rather have the needles and shit. Less to worry about

>ITT : People arguing about looks on a car
>style is subjective
>Literally arguing about opinion.

File: 1462364045620.jpg (76KB, 736x552px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 736x552px

>>16512705
>>16512375
they are mostly segment displays
up side is they don't have lag or ghosting and have very good contrast
>>16507876
unlike the tn panels must be talking of
that and they cant seem to settle on a decent look
>>16514728
they made it high end to keep up with how quick the engine revs iirc
e ink with a ring light mite be cool but its too laggy for most applications
best type for sunlight viewing is monochrome Transflective liquid crystal display (like a nokia 2280)(or sansa m240)

File: kenny-tiger-with-down-syndrome-1.jpg (57KB, 600x414px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 600x414px

>>16500228
>the Downs

>>16505439
That looks like a Jaguar XK.

File: 800px-1st_Ford_Mustang_coupe.jpg (76KB, 800x417px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 800x417px

>>16513414
Really clever. It means to say that Ford revealed the Mustang 5 months before 1965.

>1964.5
revealed at the year's half

File: 15740805_1789092781356571_1051677390562597751_n.jpg (62KB, 480x605px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 480x605px

>>16500228
Its like a Jaguar XK and a 2017 Mustang had a baby but it came out with down syndrome

>>16513414
The 289 flew over your head huh.

>>16501512
Holy Beautiful

>>16509633
he already got rid of the ecoboost that he used fan money for. So i guess its fair to say any new cars he gets are on his ass. Unless he never spend the money for the ecoshit in the first place

>>16510804
kek'd but at at least him wrecking the gt was the bikerfags fault.

>>16500228
the picture makes it look like shit because it is low quality at a shit angle and all the lines are faded out in the color and sunlight and quality of the picture

>>16505209>>16505432

shit looks great on this one, the spoiler is great and >that rear fender's sharp angles
the headlights look stupid in the yellow pic, but great in the dark grey one

>>16505426
the tail lights are literally ((( )))

>>16516840
Yes it did actually.

File: Muh-Stang 2.jpg (421KB, 1466x1069px) Image search: [Google]

421KB, 1466x1069px

>>16500548

Love my GT

>>16506881
MERCI TWINGO!

>>16519784
Those decals look tarded

>>16519784
But its so slow

File: ugly turd.jpg (70KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1024x768px

>>16508124
nope its some retards in a shop thinking they could unfack the au and they made it worse

http://www.motoring.com.au/from-the-classifieds-2001-ford-falcon-300-coupe-51336/

>>16511900
FERD MERSTERG HERHEHREH

>>16520223
>mid-high 13s stock is slow
>probably drives a 16+ second car

>>16520269
I am thinking about getting a 2018 mustang/ First I need to see the numbers cause right now im sure its still slower than the 2016 camaro cause they didnt shed any weight and just added probably about 10HP

File: WP_20170119_15_30_36_Pro.jpg (2MB, 3264x1840px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1840px

I like the '18 Mustang, looks refined. More supercar, less muscle car. Definiately a good move for the future.

Also, pic related is Where ford designers should look for supercar ideas (pic is OC)

>>16505416
kek

How idiotic would it be to DD a mustang? Not necesarily a 2018 one, but maybe a 2011-2015.

>>16521979
They're fine as DDs. People buying them as weekend cars wouldn't net Ford the kind of sales numbers that the Mustang gets.

Depending on which engine you want, it's really just a matter of being OK with the fuel expense.