Ferrari 456

File: 4d2[1].gif (2MB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 499x499px

I'll take cars OP will never drive for 300.

File: 975281289204.jpg (187KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 800x450px

>>16489766

What Ferrari cars count as "underrated?"

nah 456 is way too ugly

>>16489804
Mondial
Dino
365/400/412

aka the not frequently jerked over ones

File: maddad.jpg (86KB, 470x499px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 470x499px

>>16489815
>nah 456 is way too ugly

File: 20160128_134110.jpg (634KB, 1350x1800px) Image search: [Google]

634KB, 1350x1800px

I like the manual 456. Best seats of any car I've ever driven, considering putting them in my car. The way the hood is most of the fender and how it opens is neat. For driving it just pales in comparison to a 550. The rear suspension is problematic, they leak oil like all Ferraris, and unfortunately most cars are auto.

>>16489830
its an uglier 550 and I dont even care for it that much

90s Ferrari was just bland af

>>16489832
>dampers and oil leaks
Sounds like easily fixable stuff

>>16489883
There's only a few people that rebuild the rear shocks and the wait is long. Not something you are going to do in your garage. The seal/gasket jobs take a while and obviously almost nobody does it themselves. It's a belt car too so you need to do a belt every 5 years, really should do 3 years if you care about resale. They aren't too bad overall but you can still eat a $10k service/repair easily time to time.

>>16489766
>Front engined Ferrari GTs
Should've done the right thing and called it a Maserati tbqh meinfam

>>16489930
can't you just send them off to Ohlins or whoever and get them to make uprated replacements?

>>16490070
Front engine V12 GTs were Ferraris bread and butter for most of their existence

>>16490078
They are Bilstein, and unique to the car, it has a self leveling thing that's integrated with the damping. IDK if anyone makes a replacement that gets rid of the self leveling system like you can do for BMWs.