>under 100hp - FWD is cool

>>16482412
>over 300hp AWD is cool

>>16482446
true
>under 150hp AWD - not cool

fucking parasitic powerdrain.

>>16482412
>Current year
>Cars under 100 hp

Wew.

>>16482460
Under 150 hp the better grip would be canceled ot by the added weight at a reasinable speed anyway.
>>16482471
Econoboxes still have <100hp, my econobox as only 68 and was produced untill 2014.

>>16482446
over 500hp on awd is just asking to break shit every time you do a launch

can you afford a differential?!?!?!?!
i know i cant


having driven and owned all styles i would say that RWD is subjectivly the most fun

fwd is just so fucking practical it makes so much sense

awd is fun but because you cant easily drift most awd cars on public roads its pretty useless

also i get lake effect snow every year so dont give me that fucking bullshit about needing it for snow, thats retard teir shit

File: 94 mcchicken with jdm 98 mcdouble swap. 2 slices of cheese with legit mustard delete. will trade for taco bell or burger king, trying to get out of the mcdonalds game ricers.jpg (82KB, 957x960px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 957x960px

>>16482476
Do they sell any *NEW* econoboxes in clapistan aside from the Mirage with <100hp?

File: s1200_IMG_00061.jpg (301KB, 876x1200px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 876x1200px

what about 50hp?? tho>??

>>16482490
>over 500hp on awd is just asking to break shit every time you do a launch
If your drivetrain components are siezed adequatly, you won´t get introubble.

>can you afford a differential
They usually don´t break that easy if you don´t put excessive loads onto them.
>>16482499
VW Up, Peugeot 108, Toyota Aygo, VW Polo and many more...

>>16482522
>VW Up, Peugeot 108, Toyota Aygo, VW Polo
you missed the important part of my post
>in clapistan

I looked it up, according to autobyel the Chevy Spark, the SMART fortwo, and the Mitsu Mirage and i-Miev

>>16482552
Doesn´t VW sell Up and Polo in the US?

>>16482568
http://www.vw.com/models/
They used to, but that was a long time ago.

FWD and RWD are both fun no matter how little the hp

AWD is shit unless you have like 300 minimum

>>16482576
Since most burgers just look at the hp as only measure of performance, they won´t sell good over there.
But the world isn´t just burgerland, and sub 100hp cars have good reasons to exist everywherer.
If you drive in the city or care about your fuel economy, theses cars are great.
If you are a student or any other kind of poorfag and need a cheap car, these won´t be much to inshure and cheap to maintain.

>>16482630
>If you are a student or any other kind of poorfag and need a cheap car, these won´t be much to inshure and cheap to maintain.
except gas is cheap in burgerstan and you can get a civic for $3k

>>16482638
Maintainance and inshureance are usually extremely cheap with these <100hp cars.
Acceptable tires start at about 30€, oil change can be like 10 if you do it yourself.

~200hp in a small FWD car with a low COG is amazing. Literally drive it in the top 2,000 revs and throw it at corners.

It's just a shame FWD 'performance' cars these days are chasing power and having to have all sorts of tricksy differentials and traction control systems.

>>16482590

AWD needs diesel torque.

AWD plus a big boost derv is a match made in heaven.

>>16482499
That image is so good
It should be in the craigslist thread

File: bmw_m5_sedan_7.jpg (188KB, 1500x904px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1500x904px

>>16482412
>fwd
economy tier
>awd
best for loose surface driving tier, shit everywhere else
>rwd
god tier