Are used Mustangs any good?
>>16477565
>2008 V6
not that one
>>16477565
>V6
Unless it's an SVO only a V8 will do
>automatic v6
Kek
>>16477565
>7grand for a automatic v6 mustang
were you bumped on the head as a child?
>>16477565
$7,000? I'll give you 25 cents and some belly button lint. 'Cause that's what it's worth. It's cute that it's clean. Maybe 30 cents.
>>16477565
>2011-16 GT
>2003-04 Terminator/Mach 1
>1989-93 LX 5.0
>1986 SVO
These are the Mustangs worth buying
There's a beat to shit 5.0 Foxbody parked every day at the Carl's Jr. across the street from the bus stop that I pick up my mom from after work. It looks kinda fun, sorta fast and so beat up you don't care what happens to it.
would project car/10
>automatic
>>16477672
>no first gen
>>16477715
OP seems to be looking for a daily, not a project car
>>16477565
>cloth seats
>v6
>tan interior
Maybe for half of what he's asking
>>16477734
Oh yeah, I forgot context. I'd still daily a ratty first gen, but I can understand that some people wouldn't.
>>16477565
>mustang
>any good
>Buyting used amerishit out of warranty
Gold help you, OP
>>16477672
So an 87 T-Top LX 5.0 isn't worth buying?
Are you fully loaded?
>>16477565
The problem with used Mustangs is most of the previous owners are going to be 22 year old racer bois who ran the engine to redline every time they went the half mile to 7-11 because they thought chicks dig it.
>>16477565
For 7K$ I would rather have a 2004 GT. I bought an 01 GT for 5...so....
>>16477565
literally don't get this, instead please get a car slightly older with v8
get a 2005 Mustang GT instead, or a super clean 2004.
7K$ will get you something way more fun than the plain stang. Consider an LS1 Trans Am or an SS comaro. Anything but that v6 Auto.
>>16477565
Only if ecoboost
>tfw have a SBC laying around and fox bodies available for 500-700
Im going to make A LOT of people mad.