Why are Range Rovers so fucking unreliable?

>>16450572
built by british and indians

The new ones bought from new aren't really any more unreliable than other european lux cars tbqh. The older ones weren't that great though. "Because they're British built" is top memery.

Bear in mind that the target market for these automobiles would buy a new one every 2 years. Reliability 5/10/15 years down the line from sale is not a priority for that company

too complicated

>>16450572
Built by Indians

>>16450572
Why don't you ask Dinesh why he built it that way?

>>16450575
>>16450642
>>16450655
You guys are just racist. The Tata is just giving the financial aid JLR needs.

>>16450572
>Aluminum block
>High temp thermostat

Recipe for disaster

>>16450572
their workers are probably worse than gm fremont

https://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/561/nummi-2015

>>16450572

>Want Range Rover because image
>Buy the diesel V6/V8
>Take it for groceries and taking children to school
>What is DPF

>>16451234
The diesel is the best to buy. It's almost silent and has tons of torque.

>>16451367

Torque for days mate. 700Nm from the 3.0 V6. 40 more with the V8.

That's plenty for me.

>>16450572
no one has told europe that cars are supposed to be reliable

File: not-thinking.gif (989KB, 500x280px) Image search: [Google]

989KB, 500x280px

>>16451390

>Not realising that the Yank tanks aren't any better
Yes, keep burying your head in the sands. Not thinking is what made America great

>>16450572
Because just like humans, fatties tend to die younger

>>16450572
Their unreliability and terrible depreciation makes buying a Range Rover just an all around hilariously awful financial decision.

>>16451648
American cars use to be reliable
European cars were never reliable

File: C1ICPWIUsAEnVl4.jpg (176KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 1024x1024px

Did you guys hear David Spade got in an accident with his Range Rover this week?

File: _88071437_dsc_0732.jpg (49KB, 624x351px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 624x351px

>>16450572
British engineering feat. Pajeets.

>>16453171
>American cars use to be
>use to be
American education.

>>16453650
is that mb covered in shit?

They are actually pretty good now.

>>16451386
We can also get that in the US and I'd love to get it just for the diesel but it's way above 100k. Fuck no.

>>16455809
Indian here. It's more likely a repo'd car that's been in a lot for months. It's kind of painful to see Rolls Royces, Aston Martins and a few other exotic collecting dust at these lots and police impounds.

>>16450572
"British Engineering"

>>16457181
Looks more like flood damage.

>Why are Range Rovers so fucking unreliable?

Because they are British. Who cares? Don't by one and that problem will never be yours!

It so easy to avoid shit vehicles. Do not buy.

File: USC60TOS121A021001.jpg (279KB, 2100x1386px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 2100x1386px

The Aussies have a saying: If you want to go into the Outback, take a Land Rover. if you want to come back, take a Land Cruiser.

File: dememe.png (678KB, 800x444px) Image search: [Google]

678KB, 800x444px

>>16457186

>>16450572
Range Rover was bought out by BMW in the late 90s and it forever fucked the name range rover, that's why. New ones are made by Tata, theyre not even british.
You can have one run reasonably well, the air ride suspension is usually a major fault with them though.

>>16457787
The name Range Rover was fucked well before BMW, Ford, or Tata. If anything ownership by those companies forced them to somewhat address their reliability issues.

>>16457993
I blame Lucas the Prince of Darkness and British Leyland