Why does /o/ make fun of Dodge Chargers and Challengers?

>>16449635
They literally can not afford them while dope dealing niggers can.

they're for dudes too old and fat to fit into a mustang

>>16449635
>any chrysler product

pick none

>>16449635
Because this board thinks an 80's Corolla or a 90s Honda Civic is the pinnacle of automotive engineering, and most of /o/ is too cheap/full of europoors to get something new or nice.

>>16449678
What's wrong with FCA? Gimme a redpill

File: attachment.jpg (93KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 500x375px

They think it's shit because they weigh four or five thousand lbs and have slightly higher than industry average maintenance intervals but then they praise the Ford Panther platform. A Plum Crazy 6spd Challenger RT Shaker is one of the few modern cars I really like. 3.5 Magnum powered LX cars have reached beater status, and I even see hemi powered police package Chargers for sale for as low as three grand sometimes.

>>16449652
underrated post

/o/'s thoughts on the avenger? I was just given an '08.

>>16449652
S class, not E

>>16451222

Technically, the LX platform was based off the LH platform, which itself was based on an E class chassis with S class front suspension.

Bumpan

>>16449716
Seconding this. I've driven dodge all my life, but if there's something I aught to know, I'd like to hear it.

>>16449752
just because you like it doesnt mean its any good

there are 1200 problems reported for every 1000 dodges made statisticly you will either have a ton of problems or a few problems with any one you buy