What went wrong?...

>>16448590
Way to much luxury, not enough performance

>>16448590
Honda hasnt been right since they killed the s2k

File: 1995-acura-nsx-9.jpg (219KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 1920x1200px

>>16448590
Light weight
Balance
RWD
A pure car held in high regard by Senna And the Drift King


How did the NEW one become a "meh" hated by purist drivers....it's not even about speed, or times....the feel is WRONG

The first NSX had something to offer the world: supercar performance and styling, with good reliability and reasonable price.

The new NSX doesn't offer anything new, nor does it pay homage to the original. It's just a generic modern supercar.

>>16448590
>What went wrong?
Senna is kill

File: 7843243453.jpg (233KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 960x640px

Nothing. great car and possibly a future japanese classic. /o/ will love it once it pulls off some meme lap time. When the original NSX came out the base model was barely faster than base model C4 Corvettes and slower than M3s.

>>16448633
But i thought feels were for boomers :l

the old NSX is a billion dollars now

File: 0e89b1c0d0c84dba8db522fadeacc891.jpg (96KB, 563x601px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 563x601px

>>16448646
You can't even shift it anon

>>16448590
Acura chose not to draw the line between making a good car and displaying tech.

File: meme laptime.jpg (23KB, 538x184px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 538x184px

>>16448646
>once it pulls off some meme lap time

It already has

File: nsxfast.png (31KB, 562x674px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 562x674px

Nothing

>>16448652
Yeah flappy paddles dont exist

>>16448590
>too heavy
>shit cornering
>shit acceleration
>only 500hp
>too expensive
Worst flop of the year desu

File: xpblSAr.png (40KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 625x626px

>>16448604
>>16448633
>>16448653
You tards realise the original NSX wasn't a pure driver's car either? It was loaded with tech and luxury as well

>>16448669
>corners like it's on rails
>acceleration matches million dollar hyper cars
>costs 2/3rds of Ferrari's offering, same as the original NSX

File: 01-Acura-NSX-Exterior-Mockup-Exterior-Design-Project-Leader-EMBARGO-2015-01.12-626x386.jpg (63KB, 626x386px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 626x386px

Let's not forget the real reason they made the new NSX...

>womyn can into cars too!
>look a fit blonde womyn designed a super car!
>can you even!
>yes you can because womyn are equally contributing members of society that can do anything men can do and this car proves it!

>>16448682
>90s "tech"
>90s "luxury"

>>16448682
>acceleration matches million dollar hyper cars

Maybe to 10 MPH, but to 60 or the 1/4 mile, it isn't even the fastest in its own price range

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WoNAt9bQZtY

nothing

its a great car


just because some BR nigger isnt alive to get a paycheck and say good things about people dont like it

>>16448687
>the real reason they made the new NSX
The concept was announced well before she was brought onto the project, and all she did was stick on some vents for cooling

>>16448687
>designed mostly by men for 90% of it's design phase (which was over a decade)
>women brought in to solve a heating problem with cooling the turbos (which she fixed)
>/r9k/ complains the entire car is her fault

>>16448694
Here's the thing, the NSX can do that all day and you don't have to dig through menus to bring it up, just hold the brakes, rev up, then go

File: IMG_1652.png (2MB, 1689x949px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1689x949px

>>16448665
Hey, there is the P3 again!

>>16448693
Oh right, the car from the early 90s was supposed to have tech and luxury from 2017

>>16448701

Which just proves that Honda was only interested in promoting a vehicle - any vehicle - designed by a WOMYN.

Seriously, no other manufacturer has EVER paraded a designer around the way Honda did with this chick. She was fucking EVERYWHERE, on EVERY show, promoting this tedious piece of shit. Ironic, because she was just 7/10 eye candy that garnered the vehicle more views. Could've had the same effect by hiring Kate Upton to smear her tits all over the car for 30 minutes straight.

>>16448710
>>16448701
lel these

>>16448723
I've seen her on Jay Leno's garage for like 5 minutes and that's it, you faggots make it sound like she was plastered all over billboards

And she seems to actually know about car design, a hell of a lot more than all of /o/ combined
>b-but muh pop-ups

>>16448710

maybe if you whiteknight a bit harder she will suck your dick anon

>>16448733
>having something higher than a double digit IQ and not sperging out over nothing is now considered white knighting

File: 1476766835660m.jpg (99KB, 1024x978px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1024x978px

>>16448665
>He thinks you can shift without a clutch pedal

File: fedora_max.jpg (61KB, 500x502px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 500x502px

>>16448741
>>16448732

File: 1980-Chevrolet-LUV-4x4-Pickup.jpg (41KB, 600x344px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 600x344px

>>16448744
>he thinks you can't

just find the RPM sweet spot and cram it.

File: manlet.jpg (11KB, 350x200px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 350x200px

>>16448741

does your gender studies professor know you spend time on 4chan?

lmao so apparently its a shit car because they dont like that a woman worked on it

>>16448733
>be wrong and get btfo
>sperg out and resort to ad hominem

lmao

>>16448758
They also can't afford it, that's always a key factor

>>New
>>Sportscar
>eXperimental

File: triggered2.jpg (16KB, 497x346px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 497x346px

>>16448758

>literally playing the victimhood card this early

wow this really is a woman's car

>>16448652

Is that Alec Baldwin?

>>16448762
Where's your nsx then, faggot

>>16448772
I bet you ride in a manly man bus

>>16448759

t. beta cuck

>>16448758
>>16448762

samefag, and you can't afford it either so that's a moot point

>>16448772
not my fault you dont like a car because you hate women

>>16448779
only one of those is me desperat/o/

>>16448682
Not exactly, sure it was mid engine but a 6 cylinder and some bucket seats wasn't tech, not even for the 90's

>>16448775
I'm not butthurt enough to cry about cars I can't afford like you faggots

Just need 3-5 years to pay off my mortgage then I can get whatever

File: wtf.gif (2MB, 419x416px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 419x416px

>>16448762

BREAD ON HOOD FAGGOT

I WANNA SEE YOUR NSX

>>16448784
>just a 6 cylinder
You guys are just cementing that nobody on /o/ knows a thing about cars

>>16448785
>Just need 3-5 years to pay off my mortgage

literally lol'd

>pretending you don't live in mumma's basement

If there's a cuck without a house in this thread, it's you.

>>16448803
Whatever helps you sleep at night, buddy

>>16448795
the original NSX was an ugly kit car of a midengined Accord

its just a V6 a shit one at that

>>16448785
>Just need 30-50 years to pay off my mortgage

FTFY

File: 739.png (53KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 625x626px

>>16448808

File: trollface_irl.jpg (112KB, 540x720px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 540x720px

>>16448806

fuckin ur mum certainly helps

>>16448806
not being a wageslave indebted to jewish overlords is a good start

>>16448822
yeap

lets act like this piece of shit is a godmachine because some hue faggot said so

>>16448795
Maybe. or maybe today's modern tech doesn't align with desirable attributes for true drivers.

>>16448835
Yeah but nobody on /o/ actually owns or drives cars

>>16448682
>>corners like it's on rails
Every review said it cant out corner or accelerate a 10 year old R35
your a total fucking retard
>acceleration matches million dollar hyper cars
No it doesnt its noticeably slower
>costs 2/3rds of Ferrari's offering, same as the original NSX
250k+ and NOSALES lol is hilarous

File: original.jpg (82KB, 970x600px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 970x600px

>>16448840
as if

>>16448850
>I pulled all of this out of my ass

>>16448687
shes qt and the car looks nice but its too heavy, slow and overpriced to be considered any good

>>16448850
Every review I seen says it handles pretty damn well


>$250k
More like $160k, like >>16448860 said your pulling shit out of your ass

File: 1479010223138.jpg (43KB, 585x720px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 585x720px

I don't get it what's wrong, it's a great looking car.

>>16448875
looks do not make a classic car alone.

it doesnt handle very well
it doesnt accelerate very well
and it costs alot

maybe it will age better than we think but right now its crap compared to other cars and the original

>>16448875
Its not a pure driving macheeeen that /o/ can bench race with


/spoiler/ /o/ is going to hate the new supra too no matter how good it is /endspoiler/

File: You_dense_motherfucker.jpg (54KB, 678x495px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 678x495px

>>16448888
but it does...Litteraly every review says it does, and its not like you ever drove one yourself

>>16448888
You've driven it?

>and it costs alot
So like other super cars?

>>16448901
>wanting to drive a cuckmobile
stay mad

>>16448903
its not a supercar
it doesnt have the performance or the cred to back it up

Even the R35 and Vette which are 10years+ old shit over it

>>16448912
Except it was faster and drove better than the GTR in Motortrend's comparison

>>16448912
It's not a super car, it's just a sports car.

>>16448590
>design is a total fucking mess, overkill on the tryhard
>no one is excited about it because they've been "teasing" us with the concept for 10 years
>muh hybrid
>gets btfo by a hellcat or new Camaro zl1 that cost half as much and are almost affordable to normal people
>Oh and it weighs as much as a dump truck

Honestly what is to like about it? Where us the excitement?
I think they should've kept it simple with a non-hybrid high revving NA engine, kept the weight down, tamed the styling and dropped the price.
Or just make a stupid expensive hand-made all carbon fiber v-10 powered flagship a la Toyota LFA. Either way I would have been more interested.

>>16448590
everything.
all they had to do was remake the nsx.
they fucked up bad.

>>16448901

can't drive as well as my lowered Miata

>>16448921
then why is it priced like a supercar?

they fucked up

>>16448682
>posts bait pic
>is posting bait
6/10 pretty subtle

>>16448938
Because it is a supercar

literally a baby 918 Spyder

>>16448954
>literally a baby 918 Spyder
literally a fat slow pos thats selling like crap and will be discontinued soon like the abortion it is

>>16448888
>>16448888
>it doesnt handle very well
>it doesnt accelerate very well
>and it costs alot
every "classic" car ever

>>16448961
>0-60 in 2.8 seconds is slow
I bet your Civic with a few simple mods is faster, right?

>>16448912
>being this fuckign stupid
see >>16448665

it beats EVERYTHING short of the million dollar hypercars and the viper

>>16448938
160k isnt supercar pricing

>>16448973
>160k isnt supercar pricing
your right its hypercar pricing

>its an /o/ is stuck in the 90s episode

>>16448977
0/10

>>16448978
Fuck off hybrid cuck

go suck off a v6 biturbo kers wank

>>16448993
There's nothing cuckold about instant torque

>>16448999
unless you trade it for can't turns

>>16448999
>what is a v8
get a v8
>>16449019
at least v8's can turn

NSX is a boat

>>16449027
go home anon your drunk

>>16449040
everyone hates the NSX

reviews dont mean shit

>>16449047
autists on /o/ hate the nsx


ftfy

>>16449027
It's no less of a phenomenal car, but when your flagship is getting outpaced by camaro's, there's something wrong. Sad cause Honda has SO much potential but they fell short.

>>16449061
>flagship is getting outpaced by camaro's

Sauce?


Even so, put a non-racing car driver in both and I bet the NSX would win every time

>>16449061
>It's no less of a phenomenal car,
How?

Its ugly
fat
snow
doesnt corner particularly well and its HEAVY

literally everything a supercar/sportscar isnt

its more like a aborted wank that car historians will talk about as a huge piece of shit

>>16449080
still better than the original by every objective manner and lives up to the name

all that matters really

>>16449087
>still better than the original by every objective manner and lives up to the name
Then why is it selling like shit?

Why does everyone hate it?

Fuck off your delusional

File: opiniondiscarded.jpg (77KB, 680x680px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 680x680px

>>16449080
>wank

brit detected


Come back to me when you can actually drive a car, or something thats not a 1 liter shitbox

>>16449080
It's does a bit of everything good, it just doesn't stand out in any particular way. it's not the best at anything.
like ferrari

>>16449096
ausfag actually

go suck off Acura's dick

>>16449102
at least ferrari dont use cuckv6 or hybrid crap

File: mootaussies.png (43KB, 404x238px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 404x238px

>>16449103
Oh makes sense


10% of /o/, 90% percent of the shitposting. They should just ban your whole country

>>16449093
>Then why is it selling like shit?

compared to what

>Why does everyone hate it?

only autists hate it

>>16449108
true, but the word cuck automatically disqualifies you from winning more than 30% of any argument.
cuck is the v6 of insults

File: fap.jpg (184KB, 1446x1076px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 1446x1076px

>>16449112
>>16449113
>>16449122
SUCK ME OFF

File: 1440818058076.jpg (62KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 640x480px

>>16448590
They tried too hard and ended up redesigning it about a million times.
They mentioned it the the Jay Leno video with the gril who did the exterior, it sounded like it was going to be what we wanted then management said fuck it make it a hybrid because that's what Porsche did for the 918.

Basically Honda lost their way and forgot what fun is and now just rip off other companies a la the new accord with the drive train copying the koenigsegg regera.

>>16448717
Ignore anyone whose argument is putting quotes around someone else's argument. They have nothing to add and only succeed in bitching and adding more quotes to whatever you say.

>>16449134
>the new accord with the drive train copying the koenigsegg regera.


Is that a bad thing? Automakers always copied and learned from eachother.

Literally Road & Track's 2017 Performance Car of the Year

>>16449134

>make it a hybrid

every company that runs in F1 are building hybrids. this should be no different.

and nothing went wrong. they're still selling triple figures of these and the reviews are all favorable.

if they could have done anything better, it would have been a smoother road for the concept to the road. all that rockiness implies that the final product won't be quality.

>What went wrong?
People were expecting a successor to the first NSX. However, NSX stands for "New", "Sportscar" "eXperimental", meaning that they put new technology into an experimental sportscar. Which is what they've done with the first NSX and they're doing the same thing now with the current model.

>>16448590
Your mother made a mistake and now you posted this.

File: 1441205113659.gif (701KB, 255x229px) Image search: [Google]

701KB, 255x229px

>be browsing on ebay for old supercars out of boredom

>look up nsx, the new ones I completely forgot about show up

>mfw

Doesn't it have a ton of pigfat hybrid propulsion crap to please the environmentalists too?

>>16448687
>imblying 90% of the car wasn't designed by some celibate japs

>>16448590
They priced it like a Porsche, forgetting its a Honda. It may be a very good Honda but brand image is important to most peope who spend the value of a house on a car. When you hear Porsche you think, 911, Honda, Civic.

File: 1992-Acura-NSX-and-Ferrari-348-tb-003.jpg (416KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

416KB, 900x600px

>>16448590
The way I see it, the original NSX was intended to outperform the Ferrari 348 at a significantly lower price while maintaining the reliability that Honda was known for.
In other words it outperformed Ferrari's contemporary RMR V8 sports car using a V6 and a lot of modern technology.
The new NSX does the exact same thing with the 458.

>>16451356
>please the environmentalists

>>16451457
So just like the original NSX then

>>16451947
Yes. Look at how many they sold compared to equivelent priced 911s at the time.

>>16448617
Honda only makes good cars when they accidentally hand over the layout plans to factory upside down

File: 458.png (12KB, 1298x114px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 1298x114px

>>16451586
>dont know nothing about ferrari
>look up 458
>"In the year 2012 there were according to Kraftfahrbundesamt 458 Ferrari 458 newly in germany registred"

kek

>>16452268
Porsches always sell more than anything else in their class

>>16451586
The new NSX competes with the 488, which is almost certainly faster

>>16448590
it's boring compared to it's competition

File: 2ccbacfe-853f-4e83-8c16-e749b224bf6a..jpg (260KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 800x600px

>>16452735
The NSX took 10 years to develop.

This means the 2007 F430 was primarily used as the benchmark.

>>16448590
They added about a thousand LB

NSX is too old for its time. IT would've been wonderful if they were to release it back in 2010, when all the hype was there.

Now?

Its 6 years behind in supercar terms. McLaren is back at it and Ferraris are getting faster. Lamborghini, well, they're still cool.

>>16448590
They haven't released the non-electric, lightened, RWD version yet
>please be good