Crossover love thread

>>16448413
how's jamal doing? fucking your wife/gf real good?

>>16448589
What?

>>16448602
cucksover fgt

>>16448602
/o/ spergs out when someone mentions crossovers

>>16448602
>>16448413
I think reddit is better suited for your needs.

>>16448413
OP, if you don't drive a piece of shit craigslist civic or miata, /o/ wants nothing to do with you.

File: 8319b796616eba5ae989a525196c749b.jpg (49KB, 736x491px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 736x491px

>>16448413
/o/ doesnt like cross overs because they are for people who like to do things outdoors

File: 01.jpg (221KB, 1000x595px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1000x595px

>>16448413
how's the GLA AMG?

>>16451409
this

same goes for trucks.

Crossovers are
>spacious
>lots of utility
>practical
>barely any more ground clearance than a normal car
>look retarded

Just get a wagon faggot, they offer everything a crossover can and they look good!

>>16451409
>>16451423
>>16451622
Fuck off you samefagging cuck, no one here likes crossovers but you

>>16451622
They have a ton more ground clearance and can fit bigger tires.
Also AWD that most wagons dont have
Also
>wagon
>america
Slim pickins of shit cars

File: 20170108_112103.png (28KB, 720x257px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 720x257px

>>16451627
Lol.
Get out of the basement sometime and stop suckin on your mommas teet for bus fair sometime

Crossovers are such a meme holy shit
>tries to do everything
>none of it well
>ugly as fuck to boot
Really, a unibody SUV or a wagon is better than a crossover.

>>16451628
>a ton more ground clearance
>AWD

L O L

>>16451409
what can a crossover do that a VW Golf can't?

hint: it's not offroading

>>16451628
>They have a ton more ground clearance and can fit bigger tires.
>Also AWD that most wagons dont have
erm no

>>16451649
>>16451642
>>16451639
Glad you guys brought all that proof with you

>>16451653
the burden of proof is on you when you claim shit

File: your-bait-will-have-to-try-harder.gif (328KB, 1000x773px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 1000x773px

>>16451409

Define "outdoors". It doesn't mean what you think it means. I'd rather buy a mid-70's Range Rover than buy what accounts to be a Mazda hatchback on raised suspension.

>>16451659
I didnt. They do have awd. And they do (usually) have more ground clearance.
Then you 3 puked shit all over the thread.

File: SO MUCH MORE.jpg (35KB, 915x411px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 915x411px

>>16451653

File: 7c480019-55b4-4cc4-9a44-d9d68f6c7400..jpg (495KB, 1918x1080px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 1918x1080px

I think I'm going to trade in my Veloster for a Toyota C-HR in a few months.

I like this thing. Basically a Nissan Juke but from the Japanese brand not associated with nigger-ness.

File: finished-being-strange.gif (946KB, 300x224px) Image search: [Google]

946KB, 300x224px

>>16451668

Ignoring the little world you're living in, you have to admit that the majority of the crossover SUVs will be used by soccer moms driving to and from the supermarket.

File: nothing-to-see-here.gif (1MB, 360x240px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 360x240px

>>16451679

Are you usually this stupid or are you making a special effort today?

>>16451684
Most donuts are eaten by cops.

That doesn't make donuts not delicious.

>>16451684
Great for hauling soccer gear, and kids, and groceries, all while being safe and having awd for poor weather conditions.
Sounds great to me

File: 1474729947407.jpg (82KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 960x720px

>>16451639
>>16451642
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0_uFKYsAmI

they are significantly more capable than cars, your salty tears are delicious though

>>16451692
I'm sorry, is there a problem?

>>16451695
you can literally do all of those, and more, in a wagon and you wouldn't look like a cuck

>>16451668
http://www.autobild.de/artikel/kombi-gegen-suv-test-3924014.html

File: not-amused.jpg (12KB, 480x366px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 480x366px

>>16451693
You're forgetting the fact that everyone likes donuts and not everyone likes a crossover.

>>16451695
The hatchback that these are based on can do that do that just as well without taking up necessary road and parking spaces

>>16451737
>and more
No
Wagons are for old men with no lives and look like shit.
Plus no ground clearance and most dont have awd
Again
>america
>wagon
>awd
Not much choice. All are shitty

>>16451755
>The hatchback that these are based on can do that do that just as well without taking up necessary road and parking spaces
This doesnt even make sense.

File: KP.png (103KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 700x700px

>>16451734
Well, buying a car that ugly is a problem. It can make blind kids cry, it's that bad

>>16451419
My mom likes hers.

File: pipe-time.jpg (19KB, 222x203px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 222x203px

>>16451761
A hatchback can carry similar loads to that of the crossover without the size of the vehicle being a problem to other road users, ie limiting parking spaces and lengthening road congestion

>>16451756
Because only the US has cars, the rest of the world is still living in caves and trying to figure out stone tools.

File: Aug 18 015.jpg (783KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

783KB, 1600x1200px

>>16451737
>wagon
>not looking like a cuck
pick one and only one abdul

>>16451764
Oh OK, just your opinions.

I was worried there was an actual problem, like your autism.

>>16451699
>significantly more capable
>can drive throug 1 feet of mud
W O W

>>16451793
>same size as hatchback
>more capable
You dont make sense
>>16451806
Pretty much

>>16451756
>most don't have awd
because awd is unnecessary. fwd or rwd is fine with snow tires.

>>16451824
1 foot deep of mud will stop any car

>>16451836
>has never driven in deep snow
Wew

>>16451840
this

>>16451824
>btfo lel

>>16451851
>offroading in "deep" snow

Then you should be in your Range Rover to being with.

>>16451851
>having to drive in deep snow
where the fuck do you live where they don't plow the roads? and if it's super deep why are you out driving in it anyway?

ITT, retards who think AWD helps in 1 foot of snow.

>>16451915
My city doesnt plow side streets or roads that arent a bus route for school busses.
I have to go about a mile of side streets to my home. My FWD wont do it.

File: roll-the-eyes.gif (426KB, 177x214px) Image search: [Google]

426KB, 177x214px

>>16451812

Yeah, yeah. You're buying THAT Jap-crap and calling ME autistic...

Keep living in your little dream world, hope you don't graze any kerbs or drive over your lawn and get it stuck

>>16451756
What are subaru wagons? You know, like 50% of all wagons on the road?

>>16451975
I wont. I'll have AWD for trekking through blizzards and avalanches like a pro. Thank you for your genuine conern, however.

>>16452035
>shit reliability
>poor mpg
>poor ground clearance
(Unless you get a CUV subaru)
>calling CUVs cuck mobiles
>recommend a lesbian/vapeswag mobile
Wew

>>16452035
subarus are for lesbians and WRX fuckbois

>>16452035
Right, cause that has nothing to do with the fact they're the only Jap scrap Mannie making wagons or nothing, nahh

>>16452054
You are talking about poor mpgs but awd crossovers are fine.
>>16452062
Crossovers are for blind soccer moms who can't drive
>>16452184
>What are the 3 series wagons?
>What are the passat/golf alltrac wagons?
>What are the e class wagons?
>what are the A4 wagons?
>What is the volvo V60
etc.
Subies are more popular cause of vape culture but there's plenty of wagons being made.

>>16452374
>>What are the 3 series wagons?
>>What are the passat/golf alltrac wagons?
>>What are the e class wagons?
>>what are the A4 wagons?
>>What is the volvo V60
what is overpriced euroshit

File: CR-Cars-II-Brand-Comparison-Chart-10-15.jpg (223KB, 750x856px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 750x856px

>>16452413
>murica

>>16452374
None of those wagons are Japanese
Notice I said it's the only JAP SCRAP MANNIE making wagons, you fucking retarded faggot

>>16452496
Notice how jap scrap and euroshit is wayyy at the top of that list.

>>16452524
Notice how you keep moving them goalposts like a faggot

>>16452559
notice how btfo you are :>)

>>16452570
>BTFO
>me
Ohh noes

>>16452042
Hopefully you are a Europoor then.
https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/auto/2018-toyota-c-hr/preview/

>>16453227
>the US model has been fitted with different lights front and rear, but regrettably, they appear to be cheaper, non-LED units.

>We're particularly bummed we won't get more powertrain diversity in the States, but the most curious -- and frustrating -- omission is a lack of available all-wheel drive, a pretty essential ingredient for entry into crossoverdom. That's right: the C-HR is front-wheel-drive only,

All interest lost. Thanks anon.

>>16452473
>madza reks them all
thanks for proving my point, overpriced shit! lel

>>16453365
>mazda reks them all
>Audi still better