Why is it common for electronics in German cars to fail when

Bad positioning.

they don't

>>16439144
They do.

Same problem with Volvo. My dad has owned three of them and all three had electrical issues.

>>16439129
Dumb Amerfat you are thinking American cars as they fail at everything.

You will never see a Mercedes or Audi fail as they are quality built.

File: RegularDecentAxisdeer.webm (792KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

792KB, 960x540px

>>16439129
german over-engineering

Back in the 1950's and 60's (and certainly before,) Lucas Electric made all the switches, headlights, ignition, etc.,etc. for all British cars. In those days, they were famously unreliable.

Lucas - Prince of Darkness. Only organization I've ever run across that could disable a car with a bad tail-lamp.

>>16439152
Source on them being more faulty than nipcuck 4bangers?

I've owned hondas, fords, nissans, and currently own a z71 and e46. Never had an electrical issue with any of them except the hondas and nissans

>>16439162
>vw
>quality
You tried

>>16439129
Do you have statistical information pertaining the electronic malfunctions of both manufacturers or you just happened to know a friend whose BMW had a broken Bluetooth?

>>16439204
Nice meme. Show me the car it belongs to

Is that an actual engine bay or is that just a meme?

>>16439226
Ever driven a Chrysler?

>>16439129
Because the Japanese have smaller hands better suited for working with electronics

>>16440521
>Daimler Chrysler
>German owned
You've just played yourself lad

File: n12304964_39181211_4650.jpg (17KB, 317x225px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 317x225px

>>16439217
>I've owned hondas, fords, nissans, and currently own a z71 and e46. Never had an electrical issue with any of them except the hondas and nissans

Bullshit.