Honda CRZ

>>16428615
Far too heavy to be a true CRX successor but at its core it is a Honda. If it's cheap, seems good, and you're OK with cargo space and visibility I'd consider it.

>>16428615
It's a cheap Honda.

Less interior volume than the Fit.
Less visibility than the Fit.
Worse fuel economy than the Fit.
Heavier than the Fit.
Slower than the Fit.

But looks better than the Fit.

>>16428618
Even with shit in the back can you see out that slanted rear window? It looks like it'd be hard to see out of.

>>16428620
its also safer
the fit is a death trap

I owned one of these. Good car.

50mpg isn't hard. Fill ups are cheap. It's not a sports car, but it is fun. Plenty of aftermarket.

If you're in the market of adding power, you can scavenge a lot of stuff off of an older honda fit; intake manifold, cam and rockers (for real vtec instead of economic vtec).

Along with all your breather mods and a tune, you might make 160hp, while still staying close to 40mpg.

2650lbs, 160hp, 40mpg. Not a bad set of numbers.


Also, the chassis is pretty darn good for what you pay for. Also a perfect candidate for a K-swap.

>>16428615
It's a failure. It tries to evoke the CRX. Looks-wise they did right. Everything else though is all wrong.
It's not as fuel efficient as the original despite being a hybrid
The fuel economy is no better than if it didn't have the hybrid setup
It's not as fun to drive as the original CRX

What they SHOULD have done is base it on the 8th gen Civic instead of the Fit and given it a K-series instead of the L15 hybrid fuckery it ended up with.

Lots of potential ruined by the hybrid BS.

>>16428628
No it's not. And if it is,the CRZ is no better. You could also not be a retard and don't crash.

Just get a civic for 3k. There are much better cars you can get for 7500-10k

>>16428636
>No it's not.
wrong
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agCCJQIPLD0
>And if it is,the CRZ is no better.
wrong again
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WE68WXExtkU

So it's a cheap, Honda reliable, safe, not sports coup that'll never make over 160hp. It's quick but not that fun and overall I should get a civic?

>>16428615
>Someone red pill me
Just kill you are self

>>16428647
>small overlap vs moderate overlap
apples and oranges brah. there's a big difference between those tests.

File: 80240fba-4d2f-4416-bcba-fa835e0f84ee..jpg (1MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1440px

>faster
>way more interior room
>pano roof
>no hybrid bs
>more aftermarket
>just as reliable
>just as cheap to insure
>just as fun

If you find a decent turbo model you are encouraged to at least test drive

>>16428661
>apples vs oranges
no lol

later generations of fits rectified this issue, but for the years that OP is looking for, the comparable fit is a death trap

>>16428667
I've had the Azera and Tiburon by Hyundai.

That not a Hyundai.
It's a mistake.

>>16428671
no. He's right. There is a BIG difference between the small overlap and the moderate overlap.
Here's the Fit moderate overlap
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdCh51Iue_c

They never tested the CR-Z in small overlap.

>>16428671
No it's not. They both got a good rating in the moderate overlap test. Here's the moderate overlap for the fit. Very little difference.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lE-K_3fkymc

>>16428683
Azera is the Towncar of the Hyundai lineup. Tiburon was complete trash.

>>16428647
B T F O
T
F
O