Do you think they'll ever appreciate in value?

File: forgive_me.jpg (57KB, 480x615px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 480x615px

>>16424212

no, they're going to go 5th gen dodge charger style I guarantee. Pile of hot garbage. If I want something that looks like a classic, I will buy an old car. If I want something that looks classic and want to sump money into it, I restomod. If I want a newer car I get a newer car, there is literally no secondary market for this car.

>>16424212
No because the market that Ford targeted (boomers) will be dead/in homes soon. Look at the drop brass cars took for a comparison.

File: file.png (507KB, 630x420px) Image search: [Google]

507KB, 630x420px

That's a nice figaro you got there

>>16424287
>Ford ripped off a 10 year old Nissan

wow

>>16424298

I think that styling could not POSSIBLY be nissan 10 years ago. They weren't that new looking... I want to say 6 years old or something, that's a 2011 model right

File: boomerfigaro.png (1MB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1000x750px

>>16424303
>figaro comes out in 1991
>thunderbird sold from 2002-2005

>>16424340
>figaro styled after 50s-60s cars
Really makes you think

Why is american design so bad?
Why do Americans accept it? Is it like slowly boiling a frog, you just never noticed how bad it was?

>>16424393

Americans are stupid and instead of not buying any of the shit we build, they look around, say "none of this is any good" but still buy SOMETHING because they're retards who always have to have something new.

>>16424404
M-muh murican companies

Maybe they shouldn't have been bailed out.

>>16424212
Look at shit from the same era/platform. A nice T Bird still commands 15k+, a Lincoln LS V8 from the same era can be bought for less than a can of Busch Light.