[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

This is the best looking Porsche ever made prove me wrong.

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 120
Thread images: 73

File: 1987-Porsche-959.jpg (74KB, 720x479px) Image search: [Google]
1987-Porsche-959.jpg
74KB, 720x479px
This is the best looking Porsche ever made prove me wrong.
>>
How can I prove something subjective wrong
>>
>>16416820
Look at it.
Q.E.D.
>>
File: image.jpg (367KB, 1280x852px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
367KB, 1280x852px
>>
>>16416820
>>
File: porsche-911-carrera-2-coupe-09.jpg (120KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]
porsche-911-carrera-2-coupe-09.jpg
120KB, 1024x768px
>>16416820
Proved wrong.
>>
File: Porsche_911SC_Slantnose_1982_1.jpg (2MB, 2000x1240px) Image search: [Google]
Porsche_911SC_Slantnose_1982_1.jpg
2MB, 2000x1240px
>>16416820
>prove me wrong.
ok
>>
>>
>>16416832
I accept this rebuttal
>>
File: 975281289204.jpg (343KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]
975281289204.jpg
343KB, 1024x683px
>>16416820
>prove me wrong.

That was easy.
>>
>>16416844
fucking stancefags fucking up this thread
>>
>>16416837
have more porn
the slant nose front end was created for racing and only seen on production cars for homologation purposes.
Fans like the look so much though that you can now buy slant nose conversion kits.
http://betterbodiesmotorsport.com/interiors/bodykits20/930SSlantNose.html
>>
>>16416849
forgot my pic.
>>
File: 1480160769845.jpg (52KB, 1000x666px) Image search: [Google]
1480160769845.jpg
52KB, 1000x666px
can't be more wrongerered
>>
>>16416820
I'd say it's very fast, and styling is subjective. I both like, and dislike the 959's appearance.
>>
File: image.jpg (40KB, 470x313px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
40KB, 470x313px
lol
>>
It just looks like a chubby 911.
>>
>>16416905
rip in peice poo walker
>>
>>16416820

The 959 looks like a Porsche with a cheap bodykit to be honest.
>>
WITNESS
>>
File: 964 Turbo 3.6_1.jpg (1MB, 1959x1469px) Image search: [Google]
964 Turbo 3.6_1.jpg
1MB, 1959x1469px
>>
File: 964 Turbo 3.6_2.jpg (870KB, 1959x1469px) Image search: [Google]
964 Turbo 3.6_2.jpg
870KB, 1959x1469px
>>
File: 964 Turbo 3.6_3.jpg (954KB, 1959x1469px) Image search: [Google]
964 Turbo 3.6_3.jpg
954KB, 1959x1469px
>>
>>16416820
993 is the best looking.

959 is the worst looking.
>>
>>16416820
Looks and aesthetics are subjective. Not everyone sees beauty in a 959

You have been proven wrong
>>
>>16416942
>959 is the worst looking.
How did you forget the Cayenne, Macan, and Panamera?
>>
I actually like the looks of the new ones.
>>
>>16416953
1st Cayenne and Panamera were ugly as sin I'll admit. But the new models look good.
>>
File: porscherightrear.jpg (262KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]
porscherightrear.jpg
262KB, 1024x768px
>>16416820
I dont know OP. Im not sure how that is possible when this exists.
>>
>>16416848
>how to spot a retarded millennial: the post
>>
>>16417006
so you're saying the first Panamera and Cayenne were better looking than the 959?
>>
File: porsche-917k.jpg (377KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
porsche-917k.jpg
377KB, 1920x1080px
>>
File: image.jpg (9KB, 194x145px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
9KB, 194x145px
/thread
>>
>>
File: 04739eeb290ffc78594a89c88e6492e8.jpg (664KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]
04739eeb290ffc78594a89c88e6492e8.jpg
664KB, 2048x1536px
>>
>>
File: porsche_904_carrera_gts_37.jpg (352KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]
porsche_904_carrera_gts_37.jpg
352KB, 2048x1536px
>904 not posted yet

What's wrong with you all?
>>
I understand the appeal and rarity of the 959 but I don't think its even in the top ten best looking Porsches.
>>
File: 3093387095_310016ba22_o.jpg (3MB, 3008x2000px) Image search: [Google]
3093387095_310016ba22_o.jpg
3MB, 3008x2000px
>>
File: 6969716138_fb7ab67d0f_k.jpg (2MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]
6969716138_fb7ab67d0f_k.jpg
2MB, 2048x1536px
>>
>>
File: 22464802385_eba27402b2_k.jpg (962KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]
22464802385_eba27402b2_k.jpg
962KB, 2048x1365px
>>
>>16416820
Can't because it's true. It's like the American Psycho of Porsches. However it's impractical to own/drive.
>>
File: 1340084990191.jpg (92KB, 1600x960px) Image search: [Google]
1340084990191.jpg
92KB, 1600x960px
>>
File: 1353262975235.jpg (128KB, 1600x960px) Image search: [Google]
1353262975235.jpg
128KB, 1600x960px
>>
>>16417185
What an odd comparison.
>>
File: porsche-boxster-concept-1.jpg (654KB, 2000x1125px) Image search: [Google]
porsche-boxster-concept-1.jpg
654KB, 2000x1125px
>>
File: RWB 993R.jpg (317KB, 1500x1004px) Image search: [Google]
RWB 993R.jpg
317KB, 1500x1004px
Best Porsches coming through, move over stock bodies.
>>
>>16416851
there was also a 964 slantnose
>>
File: 0298534224001[1].jpg (79KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]
0298534224001[1].jpg
79KB, 640x480px
Why are 924's so cheap lads? I've been looking at this one, it's only 2100 euros. Is there anything wrong with this model apart from it's obviously sup par looks?

http://ww3.autoscout24.nl/classified/298534224?asrc=st|as
>>
>>16417297
It's and abortion that uses a VW van engine
>>
>>16417297
because non turbo 924 are slower than a miata
probably slower than a 206 gti
>>
File: 1977_Porsche_935.jpg (171KB, 1024x724px) Image search: [Google]
1977_Porsche_935.jpg
171KB, 1024x724px
>>16417128
my nigga
>>
File: 22896433559_763331aebb_k.jpg (970KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]
22896433559_763331aebb_k.jpg
970KB, 2048x1365px
>>16417266
garbage

>>16417281
you sound underage
>>
File: fred.jpg (11KB, 312x295px) Image search: [Google]
fred.jpg
11KB, 312x295px
>>16417006
>the new models look good
>>
>>16417297
It uses mostly VW parts and it's not what you'd call fast.
924s, 944s, 928s and 968s also like to break a lot.
>>
>>16416849
>>
File: trnoNwR.jpg (117KB, 816x612px) Image search: [Google]
trnoNwR.jpg
117KB, 816x612px
>>
File: porsche_boxster_concept_3.jpg (152KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]
porsche_boxster_concept_3.jpg
152KB, 1024x768px
>>16417368
>tripfag
>opinion mattering
>>
File: 14_03.jpg (232KB, 1440x900px) Image search: [Google]
14_03.jpg
232KB, 1440x900px
>>
File: Porsche904GTS64-65e.jpg (69KB, 640x400px) Image search: [Google]
Porsche904GTS64-65e.jpg
69KB, 640x400px
>>
Porsche has literally made the same car aesthetically for 60 years straight
>>
>>16416820

All those models are ugly as shit. Panamera, 996, 997 or Cayman are best looking Porsches
>>
File: 1365913323765.jpg (331KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]
1365913323765.jpg
331KB, 1920x1200px
>>16417466
>>
>>16416848
Stancefags where?
>>
File: 924.jpg (678KB, 2000x1103px) Image search: [Google]
924.jpg
678KB, 2000x1103px
>>16417477
>>
File: 29313874535_0b3797efcf_k.jpg (837KB, 2048x1367px) Image search: [Google]
29313874535_0b3797efcf_k.jpg
837KB, 2048x1367px
>>16417380
>porsche boxster concept
>better looking than a 959 or anything else in this thread

dont think so timothy
>>
File: 20160702_111028.jpg (313KB, 1280x719px) Image search: [Google]
20160702_111028.jpg
313KB, 1280x719px
>>16417531
you are killing me with all these 911's
>>
>>16416820
Ugly as fuck
>>
File: IMG_0933.jpg (39KB, 555x372px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0933.jpg
39KB, 555x372px
>>
File: IMG_1039.jpg (24KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_1039.jpg
24KB, 259x194px
>>
File: IMG_0992.jpg (79KB, 750x406px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0992.jpg
79KB, 750x406px
>>
File: IMG_0995.jpg (87KB, 612x394px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0995.jpg
87KB, 612x394px
>>
>>16417564
picture for ants
>>
File: 15642205996_ff77fb1cd1_k.jpg (718KB, 2048x741px) Image search: [Google]
15642205996_ff77fb1cd1_k.jpg
718KB, 2048x741px
>>16417558
>>16417564
>>16417569
>>16417575
what did he mean by this?
>>
>>16417531
That looks generic as fuck
>>
File: elefant.jpg (162KB, 699x420px) Image search: [Google]
elefant.jpg
162KB, 699x420px
come at me
>>
>>16417575
I don't get it. Is it supposed to be similar? how are we even supposed to tell?
>>
>>16417711

it's le epik "911 is a beetle" meme
>>
File: 911R.jpg (3MB, 3872x2592px) Image search: [Google]
911R.jpg
3MB, 3872x2592px
>>16417664
>911R
>generic

mkay, clearly you have no clue what you are talking about.
>>
>>16417865
Yes it's a very generic looking 911, fucking deal with it
>>
File: fuck of weabshit.jpg (28KB, 562x375px) Image search: [Google]
fuck of weabshit.jpg
28KB, 562x375px
>>16417459
>>
File: porsche-turbo-14.jpg (109KB, 940x504px) Image search: [Google]
porsche-turbo-14.jpg
109KB, 940x504px
>>
>>16416905
This.
>>
File: 91.jpg (31KB, 300x100px) Image search: [Google]
91.jpg
31KB, 300x100px
>>16417964
>posting this unironically on a weeb site
>>
File: Stuttgart%20022.jpg (43KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]
Stuttgart%20022.jpg
43KB, 800x600px
>inb4 this isn't a porsche
even porsche considers it a porsche
>>
File: Stuttgart.jpg (54KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]
Stuttgart.jpg
54KB, 800x600px
>>16418305
>>
>>16417580
I always forget how tiny the 550 is
>>
File: IMG_9092.jpg (446KB, 1600x1066px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_9092.jpg
446KB, 1600x1066px
proving you wrong wasn't that hard famalam
>>
File: 550_spyder.jpg (328KB, 3486x2279px) Image search: [Google]
550_spyder.jpg
328KB, 3486x2279px
>>16416820
>>
>>16416939
Wait, how is there a centaur in the background of this pic?
>>
File: 918.jpg (700KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]
918.jpg
700KB, 2048x1536px
Porsche fucking nailed the styling on the 918, the perfect mix of familiar porsche and hypercar aesthetics. Much much prettier than the ferrari the ferrari the ferrari the ferrari or the mcpone
>>
File: 85 911 slant.jpg (186KB, 1024x681px) Image search: [Google]
85 911 slant.jpg
186KB, 1024x681px
>>16416820
>"best looking"
>so ugly that Welt won't even touch one

entire back end of that car is a mess. pic related looks exponentially better
>>
>>16418396
death machine
>>
>>16418430
sexiest death machine ever made.
>>
>>16418429
that entire car is a mess
>>
>>16418429
>implying the rear isn't the best part of the 959
>>
>>16418483
The rear end looks horrible, even from that "flattering" angle. It looks like a 911 wearing a diaper.
>>
File: 356 Carrera.jpg (139KB, 1072x712px) Image search: [Google]
356 Carrera.jpg
139KB, 1072x712px
>>16417185
>>16417185
>"impractical"
>has a 6spd manual
>is awd
>gt comforts
>advanced(for the time) ecu

literally wat.

Also.

>tfw no og carrera
>>
File: porsche-930-turbo-06.jpg (169KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]
porsche-930-turbo-06.jpg
169KB, 1600x1200px
930 turbo best porsche
>>
File: porsche_928_gts_6.jpg (4MB, 4096x2048px) Image search: [Google]
porsche_928_gts_6.jpg
4MB, 4096x2048px
Oh shit waddup
>>
>>16418738
never saw the appeal
>>
File: 5653265100_da3eac8639_b.jpg (285KB, 1024x767px) Image search: [Google]
5653265100_da3eac8639_b.jpg
285KB, 1024x767px
>>16418749

>dat ass
>>
File: Lada Samara.jpg (39KB, 630x421px) Image search: [Google]
Lada Samara.jpg
39KB, 630x421px
>>16418305
Do they have also one of those in there? Porsche helped to develop it.

Also what's with the S1 Quattro in the background?
>>
>>16418738
>>16418763
928 is a looker to be sure but pretty pigfat for its size
>>
File: Adieu.jpg (165KB, 800x440px) Image search: [Google]
Adieu.jpg
165KB, 800x440px
>>16417677
>>
>>16416848
>not knowing what a 993 GT2 is.
>>
>>16418738
>>16418763
ugliest Porsche
>>
>>16417677
underrated.
>>
>>16417297
>>16417512
>>16418738
>>16418763
What the fuck were they thinking with this? You can't even use era as an excuse because some beautiful cars were produced then.
>>
>>16417512
This is particularly awful.
>>
>>16419948
Race cars aren't about looks.
>>
>>16418763
Only when I opened that pic did I finally see it. Now I don't think I can unsee it. Ever.
>>
>>16418738
>300zx, the Porsche
>>
>>16418396
You can actually buy pretty good 550 replicas nowadays but crashing one is probably sure death.
>>
>>
You say that but all I hear is the grinding of the front lip on a 1 cm bump in the road.
>>
File: 1432826540124.jpg (154KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]
1432826540124.jpg
154KB, 800x533px
>>
File: 9963.jpg (439KB, 1920x1440px) Image search: [Google]
9963.jpg
439KB, 1920x1440px
Thread posts: 120
Thread images: 73


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.