/classic car general/ - /ccg/ Flood Edition. >Post your

>>16412478
>Flood Edition.
Cheap classics edition you mean.

File: 1468519252547.gif (2MB, 350x315px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 350x315px

>>16412513

What was the largest car you'd consider a muscle car?

>>16412555
Ur mum lmao

File: 5882931657_b97acb75b0_b.jpg (303KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 1024x768px

>>16412478
>that '57 Chrysler
I'd love to have one of those, would have to be a quad headlight model though.

My next car is going to be '57-'59 Mopar of some sort if I can find one cheap enough. I missed out on a pretty clean '59 Desoto 2 door hardtop a few years back.

File: ded.jpg (5KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 259x194px

>TFW had to sell my 79 Caddy this year due to the frame about being ready to snap and me not having the money to fix it

good feel tho if you guys remember AdVentura, i'm buying his 76 ventura end of this month

>>16412754
look for dodge royals, i've seen some in decent condition for about 5k.

File: 32.jpg (217KB, 1022x481px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 1022x481px

>>16412555
68-70 Mopar B bodies maybe, if you only consider muscle mid size cars by definition.

If not, maybe a '70-71 Plymouth Fury GT or 427 Impala

>>16412757
Sucks bro, but also sweet

File: 00U0U_7dRnvvkkM2D_600x450.jpg (35KB, 600x398px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 600x398px

Friend is checking out my 1976 Lincoln continental right now! I'll give an update if he decides it's a good deal.

https://youtu.be/h54U9991Arc

https://losangeles.craigslist.org/lgb/cto/5914897614.html

File: stella.jpg (51KB, 600x487px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 600x487px

>>16412835
felt real bad man, i miss her

>>16412863
I just watched that exact video like an hour ago.

>>16412866
How cheap did you have to let it go for?

File: cryin.jpg (41KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 480x270px

>>16412887
$600. i was worried that with winter coming I couldn't drive it w/ the frame being bad. fucking hate myself for selling it too b/c the winter wasn't even bad. i paid $1300 for the car.

Why is proper Chrysler Red so hard to find?

>>16413000
Hirsch sells it. Not real cheap but quality stuff. Can be sprayed or brushed on I think.

http://www.hirschauto.com/ENGINE-ENAMEL/productinfo/EE-QUART/CHRY%20RED/

>>16413020
Damn anon ima have to buy you a kilo, this is exactly what i need.

>>16413000
I know your feel, but for Pontiac's solar gold.

File: 00505_eFMNfK95Lw3_600x450.jpg (32KB, 600x337px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 600x337px

>tfw no classic ih

Really like this one: http://kansascity.craigslist.org/cto/5928245938.html

But then: http://kansascity.craigslist.org/cto/5918778288.html

File: mms_20170101_165151.jpg (262KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 2560x1440px

They're still checking it out. Pics of the problems with the car

File: mms_20170101_165213.jpg (326KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

326KB, 2560x1440px

>>16413349

File: mms_20170101_165220.jpg (230KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 2560x1440px

>>16413353

File: mms_20170101_170023.jpg (199KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 2560x1440px

>>16413362
Been sitting for a year BTW with a 460 4 barrel carb

File: mms_20170101_170032.jpg (205KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 2560x1440px

Interior is 10/10 though

File: mms_20170101_170040.jpg (44KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 1280x720px

>>16413379
Last

My friend has a guy who can replace the top for 600.

>>16413353
i'm in love with this trunk

>>16413391
>Vinyl roof
Why do I find these so appealing when in good condition

>>16413412
It's the tuxedo roof apparently if I remember correctly. But I'll probably be putting vinyl

>>16413362
Oh shit nigga it's got filigree design side molding.
Buy this thing

File: mms_20170101_171650.jpg (295KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 2560x1440px

Friends making sure there's no gunk in the fuel tank before they drive it so they went to oriellys

>>16413420
Didn't even notice till you pointed it out.

The guy is moving and already has his whole house empty, so pretty sure I can get a good deal. My friend is a really good negotiator. Way better than I am

>>16413487
Good luck man. How much you think you can get it for?

File: 1974_ford_4x4_crew_cab_high_boy_hulk_cond_go_anywhere_4_lgw_f0ab1e93dc6ac0630dd90343b19dae864f512540.jpg (493KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

493KB, 1600x1200px

bumpage

File: 00b0b_gMbL3Ij3Qdm_600x450.jpg (36KB, 600x398px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 600x398px

>>16413641
1600. I'll be buying it on the 5th after I get home from trucking

File: 1460077567090.jpg (107KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 400x400px

>>16414102
Hell of a deal

>>16414102
Great price. I'm paying $500.00 more for a '79 Bill Blass Mark V because it's a highly-optioned coupe, but your car will be nicer; until I'm done with it.

>>16412800
Ever see Burt Reynolds in "White Lightning"?

>>16414157
Great movie

>>16414102
Good deal

>>16414157
Who doesn't love Burton Reynolds?

>>16414292
Damn you, autocorrect...

>>16414157
Yeah but an LTD isn't really a muscle car. It's cool and I like it, but not muscle really and yes I know it's probably a 429, but those 4 on the floor shots were from a Mustang,
I said the Fury GT earlier because it got the stripes and badges which are muscle car features, I shouldn't have said Impala because IMO again it doesn't really count,

File: IMG_1912.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

>>16411941 #
Yeah, just changed them this fall. They're PST 1.03 bars.

>>16414354
Impala 409 is most def a muscle car. Beach boys even wrote a song about it.

>>16414354
Bruh that was a '71 Galaxie 500.

>>16414451
I couldn't remember if it was an ltd or galaxie. same car either way though.

File: 20170102_171944.jpg (931KB, 2560x1536px) Image search: [Google]

931KB, 2560x1536px

How do I get the driveshaft off. I have the u-bolts out but it's stuck.

>>16414957
smack it with a rubber mallet, 2x4, whatever.

>>16414957
Big screwdriver behind the u joint and pry against the yoke.

>you will never drive your 69 Camaro while drinking a beer and listening to Beast of Burden while being stalked by a possessed Plymouth Fury

>>16416841
>that feel when no qt Plymouth waifu.

What would you guys say is the most masculine muscle car? I'm not asking what would make YOU look the most manly, but like, if it weren't considered gay, a car you'd call "he" rather than "she".

>>16417007
'68 charger hands down

File: 2ec199b13f07bf040e15c6fca25ee1e0.jpg (147KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 500x375px

>>16417007
1970 Dodge Coronet

>>16417043
She's pretty.

File: FB_IMG_1483378641251.jpg (72KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 960x540px

A few more photos of the Lincoln that is buying on Thursday for $1600 (originally 2100)

The guy is moving and has his house cleared out already, and I think he already has a flight booked for the day of the sale.. So I might yank down the price a bit just to be an ass hole, but probably not

Needs a new power steering pump and a new fuel pump

File: FB_IMG_1483378647399.jpg (58KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 960x540px

>>16417645

File: FB_IMG_1483378661358.jpg (13KB, 528x960px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 528x960px

>>16417653

>>16417043
coronets/bees are fucking awesome. easily my favorite grille

File: 72Plymouth-SatelliteKars-n-Shit.jpg (477KB, 1275x850px) Image search: [Google]

477KB, 1275x850px

>>16417007

File: 1483397764815646981272.jpg (617KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

617KB, 1080x1920px

Here's an update on the list

>>16419131
You even have the block yet?

>>16419202
Nah I'm waiting until I buy an engine stands then I'm going to rip a 5.0 out of a 97+ explorer

>>16419217
>buying an intake and carb before you even buy the block

>>16419366
I mean I know what I'm going with, and I've researched what parts I want. The engine is the easiest thing to get because it's the most common part to find

>>16419387
Why don't you take the rear end from the explorer too? Don't all of them have 3.73 Traction-lok?

>>16419404
Because I've got a Dana 60 with 4.11s already on there. Would love to swap to 3.73 gears with an LSD though

>>16419366
I've done this several times. I bought the front end for a 1965 Imperial before I bought my 1966. For me, it's all about the deal. If I know I'm going to get a car, I buy whatever rare parts for it I anticipate needing or would like to have spares of on hand.

What's the car at 3:50?

https://youtu.be/WO7EOLxs0DE

>>16419468
A Dodge Challenger

>>16417007
Superbird

>>16419409
desu I would rather daily something with 3.73 gears and a LSD than 4.11.

>>16419509
Me too, but it's also cheaper to just use what I've had

File: DSC_0188.jpg (2MB, 6016x4000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 6016x4000px

>>16417007
3rd gen Nova

There's just something about them, personified they would be a heavy set 50 year old biker who could destroy your face with his meaty fists if you say "fuck Trump." They're just fucking gritty and sketchy looking. The small rectangular tail lights, the 'leaning over you' looking front end, just built super bare bones so they could literally live forever in a nuclear holocaust'd world

Nova's come patina'd and have a lead pipe under the seat for bashing skulls from the factory

see: Deathproof

>>16419743
Too small. Novas are for secretaries like the mustang, unless it's a Yenko or 375 horse 396.

>>16419753
3rd gens are barely smaller than a same year Chevelle. 67 and earlier is a bit smaller but still a large car all things considered

>>16419753
>Novas are for secretaries
Maybe the women who bought Novas wanted to be a fucking big burly biker guy

>>16419814
No. Novas, Valiants and Falcons were literally the Civics and Corollas of their day.

>>16419889
I'm well aware my dude

>>16419532
I imagine if you went to your average junkyard to pick up the 302 you could get the rear differential from the same car for cheap

>>16419937
Yeah but that's more work.
This way he can see how the 4.11s do then think about the rear diff another time

>>16419937
He could probably get a 9 inch for a couple hundred.

>>16414292
He's a notorious asshole IRL, not that I give a shit

>>16414292
>le ebin mustached false machismo mediocre actor man

>>16417657
Dude you are fucking lucky as shit, that's a Diamond Jubilee edition that you just got for an insanely low price. That BJ plaque is the original buyers initials. Only available on Diamond Jubilee editions of Lincolns

>install Grant wheel
>miss my old stock wheel
fuck

>>16419937
This is true, but it's a lot of work to convert an 8 lug car with a perfectly fine rear end to a 5 lug car with a completely different sized rear end.

>>16419937
>Downgrqading from a Dana 60 to a 8.8" or 9" in a truck.
WHY

>>16420186
>tfw im stuck in Grand Junction CO because I calculated my hours wrong, so I have to miss my appointment with the Lincoln buyer and he's flying out thursday

>>16420719
Where is he?

>>16420776
CA.

Im getting my friend to buy it for me though.

There's problems with it, but im going to love it to its fullest extent.

I'll post lots of pics when I see it on Thursday or friday

>TFW have the flu
>Been pissing out my ass for 10 hours
This sucks

>>16420935
I'm pretty jelly. That's a total mr. Lahey car

>>16420986
>That's a total mr. Lahey car
kek totally is

>>16420990
You going to hop up the 460 at all?

>>16420986
I know that feel
>Been sick for 2 and 1/2 weeks with brutal cold
>Finally feel better Monday and Tuesday last week.
>Tuesday night get woken up at 2 am with horrible ear pains, ear won't pop and pressure just builds up when I do pop it a little.
>On antibiotics and barely hear out of left ear .

Fuck winter time

>>16421037
This is genuinely terrible. My body is just not happening. I can barely move or think.

Test

File: IMG_1990.jpg (1MB, 2016x1512px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2016x1512px

Posting my Val again

File: 20170102_185002.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

I love this feature.

>>16421325
I love it on my 81 Lincoln too. The number pad on the door lights up as well.
Quite handy actually

>>16421051
All those years of degeneracy have finally caught up to you

>>16421406
That would be many months ago when I dt'd. No more though.

File: totally not coronet.jpg (213KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 500x375px

>>16417043

front end looks like glasses tee bee aych.

>>16417041
Agreed, 68 Charger is mint.

File: FB_IMG_1483378652804.jpg (27KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 960x540px

>>16420994
Guessing you were talking to me

Wouldn't know where to start desu on the engine, it's in CA so it's got all the smog shit on it. Though I know a guy who knows a guy that will pass it regardless.

Going fast isn't exactly the top of my list though. I just want to be comfy for now

>>16423046
If comfort is your goal, you couldn't have chosen a better car.

File: 00N0N_aeBlsr9pFnc_600x450.jpg (35KB, 600x398px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 600x398px

>>16423074
Maybe my first modification should be putting in a max comfy suspension system.

>>16423122
Upgraded shocks, comfortable tires, new belts and hoses, and a fuel flush are all it should need.

>>16423046
Man that thing is clean. You're can rip the smog equipment off and put a mild cam in to get a bit of a boost in HP. I was checking and cam kits for the 460 are pretty cheap.

>>16421132
That's pretty sex, anything done to the suspension or is it all stock?

File: dodge-daytona-1969a.jpg (15KB, 400x186px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 400x186px

>>16412555
The 1969 Daytona probably, a normal Charger was like 5.3 meters (maybe slightly more) which was already pretty big

>>16414102
I've heard they're super nice to drive and comfortable, am jealous

>>16417043
These were even used as patrol cars for catching speeders and faster cars iirc, damn I love mopar, badass muscle

>>16419743
Dodge Dart would be better fitting IMO

>>16423342
Not the first Dodge they did that with

File: 66ea1983f0b607c5d42b92b4156d4074[1].jpg (49KB, 599x426px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 599x426px

>>16424522
>tfw no monaco with cop motor, cop shocks and cop brakes

>>16423342
>>16424522
Ah, back when Chrysler was God-tier.

Did any other company fall so far so fast? They were mostly crap by 1975 and utter shit by 1979.

>>16425101
I wouldn't say that, even some of these 90's cars are built well.

>>16425152
the k cars where alright, but a fundamental shift from what chrysler was. the mid 70's to early 80s where colossal horsecock though.

>>16425161
to be frank m80, the V8 was an earth shattering change for Chrysler as well.
It's Damnliars fault.

File: DSC_0106.jpg (2MB, 2896x1944px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2896x1944px

>>16425152
that being said they had a few very rare exceptions

File: [email protected] (147KB, 1000x780px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 1000x780px

>>16424759
Can't forget the Polara, one of the fastest street muscles back in the 60's, supposedly could reach like 235-240 Km/H top speed.

>>16425179
>tfw it's near impossible to find a 60's/early 70's monaco or polara in denver
shit's ghey.

>>16425184
Demolition derbies are a factor in this, sadly.

File: DSC_0145.jpg (2MB, 2896x1944px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2896x1944px

>>16425200
that and cash 4 clunkers and related type programs.

it's really a shame though, those fuselage C-Bodies are so hard to find now, and the price is certainly going up

>>16425209
Pretty soon, even the malaise barges will start to appreciate. At least the motors could be woken up and they can be made fun with Summit parts.

File: DSC_8640.jpg (2MB, 3216x2136px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3216x2136px

>>16425232
this is true, and you've been able to see it on craigslist. Thankfully we live in america which has tons of backroads with tons of people who hoard cars where you can still pick up a deal, if you are willing to take the footwork.

>>16425238
Yeah, like my new toy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0e2tSDiHFew

>>16425298
I am amazed that thing works as well as it does. what engine do you have in there?

File: 15177678-Suicide-Concept-Man-Pointing-A-Gun-At-His-Head-Stock-Photo.jpg (115KB, 1300x866px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 1300x866px

>>16425238
I live in the middle of nowhere in Sweden, only cheap cars you can get here are boring Volvos, Saabs, old boxes, etc.
Something like a base Challenger in decent condition easily fetches for 30-40.000 $.
A 1965-1967 base Mustang in decent condition fetches like 15-30.000 $ ('68-'70 is usually more expensive).
But you can get 70's and 80's yachts for a decent price, seen some Cadillacs rolling around for like 5000-10.000 $, and 80's and 90's crap (Camaro, Firebird, etc) is dirt cheap.

>>16425334
The 400; the only one you could get in '79. I'd have preferred the 460, but it runs like a fine watch, has so many extras, and will look great after I get it cleaned up.

>>16425344
how hard is it to import? you can get some decent sedans here with good engines for dirt cheap.

http://denver.craigslist.org/cto/5942914002.html

>>16425352
400 isn't a bad motor. what are your plans for it? it's in much better condition than what I was expecting you to get. Good job sir.

>>16425361
Since it's not really a performance car, I'll probably remove the emissions crap, put on a dual exhaust, and add the few options it doesn't have.

Overall, I'm going to set it up to be a more fuel-efficient daily driver.

>>16425298
That engine sounds like shit. Did you take the air injection hoses off and leave the check valves open to the air?
Or is that the A/C compressor?

Anyways, that looks pigfat and comfy as fuck.

File: DSC_8633.jpg (2MB, 3216x2136px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3216x2136px

>>16425391
nice. Are you going to restore the interior and exterior at all? I didn't figure you were going to do any performance stuff to it though

>>16425397
That's the A/C compressor; it actually blows cold, despite being a bit noisy.

It most certainly IS pigfat; it's the last of the full-size cars. It's a lot comfier than my Imperial, but handles worse and is slower. It's remarkably better than the Cadillac of the year.

>>16425398
It'll get a full restoration after I'm done with the Imperial; for now, I'll be setting it up as a daily driver and doing some light touch-up work. I'll take pictures of it in the daylight tomorrow after I wash it and clean it up.

>>16425434
>That's the A/C compressor
Oh. OH. It uses a 2-cylinder Tecumseh style compressor, doesn't it?

lol it sounds normal then.

File: 665-1.jpg (33KB, 680x680px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 680x680px

>>16425353
Not sure about importing but cars that are older than 30 years here we don't have to pay taxes for and I think no insurance either but don't quote me on that

>>16425478
Try a sticky clutch plate that hasn't been activated in about 30 years. The thing has sat for most of its life.

>>16425434
Nice. Glad you're happy with it famalam. I'm just stoked that my parts hunt has been moving forward well.

>>16425398
Loving the two tone on that truck

no I am not chip

>>16425513
It's a lot of fun to have projects, isn't it?

There's something so much more satisfying about setting up a car the way you want it instead of trying to buy a new vehicle.

>>16425298
Whooo Lincoln again, finally.
What have you found doesn't work so far?

>>16425582
I just like the feeling of the hunt right now, and making things work. Its like the joy of buying a new to you vehicle, but costs a lot less and is more often.

>>16425565
Are you sure you don't want to slam it to the ground and put it on some nice chrome rims?

What classic says "get out of my way" the best and can be found rust free and functioning under 15000?

>>16425606
Annoyingly, the power seat went forward and won't go back, the left directional dash light doesn't work, neither do the power locks. The radio/CB antenna is broken, and I'm not sure about the automatic lights.

Someone also installed a pushbutton starter switch...

On the up side, the clock DOES work.

Still, after I get the seat to a position that's comfortable for someone who is taller than 4' 2" and replace all the vacuum lines, it'll be a good driver.

>>16425669
Chevette

>>16425669
all black chevy C10 with a 454 and side pipes

File: 170871_11052732_1968_Cadillac_Eldorado.jpg (64KB, 700x525px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 700x525px

>>16425669
1968/1969 Eldorado.

>>16425673
well at least the seat motor is easy to jump with a battery and some lengths of wire. if the seat goes back that way, you'll know it's the switch

File: 1971valianthubcap.jpg (29KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 640x480px

Are there any 14", 5x4 wheels that will take disc brakes AND full cover (pic related) hubcaps? (I don't know if the mopar rallye ones can take a full cover, or if they're centre cap only.)

>order new hood from Summit
>comes in with some damage
>Summit is cool and replaces the hood
>second one comes in with serious damage at the corner preventing it from even being bolted on
Surely this can't happen again right? I'd turn to buying local but don't know where to go. No I don't want something from the junkyard.

>>16426087
Car?

File: 68commuter.jpg (76KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 640x480px

Who up???? Real niqqa hours rn

>>16426597
Nyukka it's like 9:30pm

>>16426597
I'm up with the drizzling shits.

>>16426645
>>16426646
what you guys doing

>>16426673
Shitting my brains out because of the stomach flu

>>16426673
I'll give you one guess from my previous post.

>>16426678
You too? Think I got some bad food last night.

>>16426597
well it's only 8:43 right now so yes I'm up.
Watching The Siege of Jadotville

>>16426597
Still learning 5.3l swap shit

>>16426687
I'm not sure but I can't eat solid food for the last two days.

>>16426742
That sucks. I can eat but it just goes right through.

File: 66elco.jpg (81KB, 1000x662px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1000x662px

>>16426711
>>16426687
>>16426678
Well I'm drunk listening to music reminiscing of all my cars I've owned. Miss em but most of em were hunks of junk

>>16423270
The whole suspension has been gone through, but it's all stock style. 1.03" torsion bars, 73+ disk conversion, geometry correcting UCAs, solid tie-rod adjusters, and hotchkis rear leafs. Still need to upgrade the shocks (kyb's now), minitub/move leafs to frame rails, and do subframe connectors and all the frame stiffening stuff.

>>16426754
Same. It's easier to piss out my ass than it is to blow chunks out.

>>16426755
Also check em, also what attracts you guys to classic cars whem they are objectively worse than modern cars?

>>16426767
Kek. Luckily it's only coming out one end.

>>16426776
They have soul/character/personality imo. Not saying all new cars don't but it's different.

>>16426787
Feel it. I'm the same way. I just can't see myself driving a modern car (i.e. an econobox) Love my land yachts

>>16426797
Plus they are easier to work and usually parts are cheaper.

>>16426761
wew lad, what are your plans for it? Autox/pro daily driver?

>inb4 drift

>>16426797
I tried to drive an Econobox, a 2000 Sunfire, but I just couldn't do it, owned it for 2 or 3 months then had to go back to comfort and good looks

File: 71CutlassSupreme.jpg (112KB, 790x527px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 790x527px

>>16426821
I just keep thinking I could just drive an easy econobox that I could save myself time, money and the headache of owning a classic but its just not the same. Just the way people give the look of "Is that a spaceship???" that brings a smile to my face and makes it all worth it

>>16426811
Just looking to make it a fun [spoiler]street[/spoiler] car

>>16426874
Noice, good luck with it my dude, its pretty sweet the ride height is fucking primo

File: IMG_1980.jpg (2MB, 2016x1512px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2016x1512px

>>16426930
Thanks famm

>>16426993
I'm a big fan of the that spotted two tone
t. Chip

>>16425398

>dat cheyenne super

That tailgate with it's wood / chrome script brand new is my favorite rear end on a truck.

>>16427043
Thanks Mr. Foose

File: 357737.jpg (2MB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1200px

>>16426776
The looks (I like how old cars look wider because of more ground cearance and less vertical width that modern cars have for safety, just compare a modern Challenger or Mustang to a old one).
The sounds (Old engines tend to be louder and sound better imo).
The feel and culture of the car, modern cars aren't as legendary and usually less fans.
What modern car can match old muscle, American yachts, old European sports cars, etc?
Even old shitboxes are cooler than modern ones.
Also I fucking love huge 5-6 meter (or more) cars

>>16428043
This is a sfw board.

>>16428043
>TFW I don't own one that's long and black
>TFW it won't be a 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 automobile

>>16426776
There are a lot of things; for example, nothing can compare to an American luxury barge. The size is so insane; my new Lincoln coupe is 19'2" long; about 2" longer than my '66 Imperial sedan. A 1999 Honda Civic sedan is 13'8" long. There's something magnificent about having an extra half a car in length over modern vehicles.

Though, the best reason is the feel from the driver's seat. I love looking down the deck of an aircraft carrier. The feel of the thin wheel in my hands as I effortlessly glide the car over the road is truly lost on modern vehicles. The self-leveling suspension was keeping the car straight on the ride back, causing the tow truck driver to have the worst conditions of sway and tracking that he's had in years. It's something that you just have to FEEL to understand.

Fuel economy is, without a doubt, their weakness. Even so, it's no worse than most trucks and SUVs. The big difference therein being that I can fix almost everything for pennies on the dollar. Parts are cheap and easy to replace; it's always satisfying to fix an issue yourself and it's becoming a lost art.

There's also a classic for literally everyone for half the price of a new car.

Though, the Packard slogan is the best way to describe why we like them; since it's different for every person, "Ask the man that owns one."

File: IMG_20161218_144651.jpg (2MB, 1944x2592px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1944x2592px

>>16426776
Smell, feel, noise, vibrations, sledgehammer like shifts, bench seats, carburetors, looks, lack of regulations, and just they pain drive different.

Driving my truck is downright scary if you have only ever driven modern cars. It's slow, loud, doesn't stop well, didn't turn well and you'll slide around in the bench seat because there's no seatbelts and a vinyl seat. All of these are major flaws, but they give the vehicle character and the "it" factor that makes it fun to drive. That, on top of being stupid easy to modify and maintain makes ownership fun and exciting. Plus, for me, I drive a big ass red truck that no one else on the road has. I'm more than just another swinging dick in a 3k Honda Civic, I've got something that other people want, or at least that I think they want. No one looks at my Acura at a stoplight, but you always get stares in the Ford.

My $0.02

>>16426776
Because I hate having money, free time, and clean hands.

File: IMG_20161231_151902.jpg (666KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

666KB, 1080x1920px

>>16428512
>Iktf

>>16428512
Kek

I don't know anyone who's ever owned a classic for a few months and didn't like it.

>inb4 "I didn't like how soft it was on my ass and now my boyfriend pounds me in my miata" or equally fabricated BS.

File: IMG_1455.png (330KB, 638x526px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 638x526px

>tfw you cant afford a 68/69 charger and the prices are only going up

>>16429179
Buy a c body
>T H I C C

>>16428588
Believe it or not but not everybody likes malaise era barges.

>>16429349
Classics aren't limited to the malaise era; the range spans from roughly 1946 through 1980.

>just moved to muh big city because job requires me to
>cars older than 20 are banned from the roads within it
hold my beer lads I'm gonna do a flip from that bridge

>>16429442
Are you in Germany? That blows though

>>16429442
France?

File: Merry Fishmas.jpg (178KB, 1776x999px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 1776x999px

Got the brick out of winter storage for a drive last week. I should have known it would perform better in subzero temperatures than in the summer. Too bad the lack of a heater makes winter driving suck massive amounts of ass.

>>16429467
almost
>>16429487
yes
Fuck Paris, I wish I had a choice but I don't. Everything about this town sucks.
Especially the fact that the rent is so fucking high, I'll barely be saving anything and will have to wait even longer before I can get a Traction or DS.

>>16429610
If you get an old Citroen I'll be certified jelly. That's the price you pay to live in a socialist city though that's a world famous place

>>16429636
come grab one my dude, they are not even that expensive (10-40k€/$15-50k for a DS depending on age, consition, mileage, model except the convertible which is extremely rare; 7-30k€/$10-40k for a Traction ; 30-80k€/$40-100k for an SM which are quite rare as many of them were owned by foreigners)

File: IMG_20130326_140550.jpg (886KB, 2592x1944px) Image search: [Google]

886KB, 2592x1944px

>>16429527
Why no heater? I thought they came with heat standard.
>>16429648
>>16429636
My dad has a '72 DS, and I've driven it a few times; these cars are awesome. Unfortunately he's ruining it, painted it flat black, has those shitty aluminum disc hubcaps, he's going to detrim and dechrome everything. I made him keep everything he's stripping so I can return it to stock in the future. But it really sucks to see this happen. Pic related is what it used to look like.

>>16429775
Oh it has one, but the blower motor is borked. I've got a Haynes manual on the way, so I'll see if I can get it apart and fix it, but it's not a huge priority, being a summer car. The heater core is good though, the forward movement of the car draws enough heat off the core to at least defrost the windshield.

So guys lemme run something by you

what can i do to reverse the direction of the throttle on a carter bbd?


>fuck you china you fucking jews

File: b-44.jpg (128KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1200x800px

>>16429803
Got it. My first car was a 142 and it was the reason I got into working on my own vehicles. Learned a lot of maintenance and eventually swapped out the BW35 for an m41. Love the 140 series and I never should have sold that car. I'm actually picking up the 144 in the pic this weekend though, so I'll finally have one again.

File: M40.jpg (37KB, 405x720px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 405x720px

>>16429843
Oh damn, that's clean as fuck. I've got the M40 in mine. I was surprised at how tiny it is.

File: 1464994409425.png (222KB, 915x694px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 915x694px

>tfw looking for a 5.3 and can't decide on either
>going to a upullit 2 1/2 hours away and playing the engine lotto hoping I find a Tahoe that hasn't been picked to pieces
>paying double the price for an engine on ebay, not even counting shipping

I heard good things about this one place up in NH on LS1Tech so they'd probably be my go-to if I do ebay but that's my whole budget cut in half.

LKQ has some good ones for half of what Bow charges too but from what I hear they don't come complete and would probably amount to what the BowAuto guys would charge for a complete motor if I asked them to throw a bunch of different parts together.

And finally the u pull it, I'm not a fan of the odds of going to a yard almost 3 hours away just to find out that every truck in the yard has had their 5.3's plucked out the day they got there.

>>16430235
>tfw every engine I think is good turns out to be just the long block with nothing else

>>16428430
I love big vehicles, give me a Cadillac 70 series (Biggest one was 6.5 meters total) any day of the weak, or a 1979 Continental (5.9)

>>16429775
How comfy is the suspension?

File: 1970_Lincoln_Continental_-_Flickr_-_denizen24_(7).jpg (504KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

504KB, 1024x768px

>>16428430
This

>>16429179
I'd give up that dream senpai...

File: 76towncar.jpg (81KB, 799x459px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 799x459px

>tfw 7.5L
>tfw 200HP, probably less with old age

>>16431964
So what?
You forgot to mention the 353 ft-lb of torque at only, ONLY, 1600 rpm

>>16431983
Wish they made them with a diesel variant.. Kinda want to swap one into mine

>>16431983
yeah but it went downhill from there.

>>16432009
No you don't, it would have been absolute shit.
GM tried that in the early 80s in Oldsmobile and Cadillacs with a 350 diesel and it was horrid

>>16432018
I just remember my 1973 Mercedes 300D turbo diesel.. That engine was a tank, could run for a million miles

>>16414354
A friend of mine had a Country Squire station wagon with a 429. It would go 125 plus.

We'd drive away from town on this 12 mile straightaway, do a bunch of bong rips, turn around and leave it floored for 10 miles, then coast it out. In hindsight that was pretty trusting for what were probably Grand Auto tires.

My mother's Coronet felt light to the touch in comparison, and drove way lighter.

>>16432018
You shush

>>16432009
IHC 6.9?
It's about the same physical size as a 5.4 Modular. You'll lose about 30 HP and they're heavy as frig but it'll be all "Ford."

>>16432271
>Not just doing a turbo conversion 7.3 ihi

>>16432312
6.9>7.3
The 7.3 had cylinder wall cavitation issues. You have to pay real close attention to SCAs to keep it from happening

>>16432018
Sucks that those 80s diesels were shit, it was either that or the (some say equally shit) HT4100 that I have. Had my first foray into OBD I the other day, a TPS sensor short. The codes are displayed on the digital climate control. My tried and true "unplug it and plug it back in" method solved the issue for now.

>>16432566
They got good mileage at least, but really shit hp and pretty bad torque for a diesel that is a 350.
I haven't heard anything good about them, but they are pretty rare now, so if someone owns one, it's still pretty cool

File: ihs.jpg (53KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 500x375px

>>16417007

>>16432369
Fair enough
>Monster turbo on the 6.9

File: 442.jpg (94KB, 792x553px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 792x553px

>>16417007
Olds 442

>I smoke unfiltered cigarettes and crush Schlitz by the case

>>16432809
You got a problem with Schlitz? It's my favorite beer.

File: Schlitz.jpg (73KB, 564x633px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 564x633px

>>16432835
N-no

File: image.jpg (69KB, 567x561px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 567x561px

>>16428430
This easily the most autistic thing I've read this year

>>16432988
And exactly how so?
Go be a cunt somewhere else, fuck knuckle

>>16432994
>getting triggered this easily
Leave it to a leaf

>>16433033
Tbf classic cars are somewhat autistic. Then again, you're being a soft cunt

>>16428454

>ford lettering same color as body

Is that originally how it was or did you respray?

other than that it looks p. comfy

>>16433045
Not sure how the factory did it, but the truck was originally green. I think they would have painted the lettering white.

When I repaint the truck much farther down the road, I want to do a dark green, with eggshell white trimming (wheels, lettering, grille and bumpers). Make it look like an old man truck but make it go like hell

>>16432988
I was asked to defend a hobby, so I tried to use quantifiable reasons. If you want autistic ramblings, ask someone what's so great about sportsball.

Isn't the point of a hobby to derive near-autistic pleasure from something?

>>16433091
No, that's not the point of a hobby. A hobby isn't supposed to consume your life.

File: 1442324011567.png (641KB, 600x726px) Image search: [Google]

641KB, 600x726px

>>16433061

>that color combo

9/10

I would probably go slightly foosemode and do a two-tone eggshell/forest green combo with chromed hardware.

File: Harry.jpg (25KB, 312x233px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 312x233px

>>16432994
>>16433091
He's right though. Look to my reply to him for the explanation.

>>16432988
It takes autism to make people buy and get excited about classic cars, my friend. It goes with the territory of the thread, and if you haven't been able to tell that from reading the rest of the thread, you might be autistic, too. If you get euphoric about classic cars, then you belong here, and you have the 'tism to at least some degree. If you don't, why would you waste your time telling us all what we already know?

>>16433131
>you have to have autism to enjoy things not at a superficial level
Yeah no

>>16428430
>>16433091

>asked to defend hobby
>tells people why he likes it
>hehe muh """"""""autism""""""""

>>16432988
fucking faggot

File: BRGMiata-048.jpg (69KB, 591x394px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 591x394px

>>16433124
Chrome is really expensive, and I kind of like having a single body color.

When I say dark green, I meen dark. The hue I really like is the British racing green from the brg Miata. Pic related.

>>16433145
You have to have autism to intentionally buy an inferior product for subjective, aesthetic reasons. Just accept it, Anon.

>>16433104
And how is it life-consuming? At any moment I could sell every one of my cars, buy a new vehicle, and never pay another thought to what I drive. Instead, I have fun doing what I like.

Fantasy football is an autistic obsession; as it gets you to focus on arbitrary stats and watch every game for simulated teams; by comparison, we're nowhere near that level.

Nobody in these threads compares lap times, 0 to 60 times, or argues like the autistic bench racers in the other threads. We find cars that suit our tastes and refine them; like buying a suit and having it tailored for the perfect fit.

There's also a sense of camaraderie here, despite the difference in choices; nobody criticizes you for having a 6-cylinder, or calls your favorite car shit. Go find ONE other thread on here that does the same that isn't a circle-jerk.

>>16433174
>, or argues like the autistic bench racers in the other threads
I automatically get triggered by powerglide vs turbohydramatic. But numbers aren't everything here. Experience is.

Unless you mean my time slip at the drags...

>>16433172
I like turning wrenches. It's easier on classics.

1/10 for getting me to reply.

File: gallery-1442518147-gettyimages-488841567.jpg (93KB, 768x906px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 768x906px

>>16433181
So you buy inferior cars and post on here solely because you like wrenching on classic cars, and you're claiming you're not autistic? Really? You're probably more autistic than most in here.

>>16433178
I've daily driven cars with both; Powerglide is OK, but inferior to TH for daily use. It's a lot of fun for a weekend cruiser and the process of it shifting gears is awesome.

>>16433178
Hydra-Matic is obviously superior. I mean, they put it in the car in Greased Lightning. It's even in the song.

>>16433193
In what meaningful way are they inferior? I get what I want out of a car.

>>16433201
The Hydra-Matic and Turbo-Hydramatic are radically different

>>16433212
Safety, performance, accessories, longevity, gas mileage, pretty much every category. I love classic cars, and it's no sweat off my back admitting they're inferior to modern cars in most ways, really how could they not be? And my point about wrenching still stands, if you like wrenching so much you buy a car for it, you got a bit of the 'tisms.

I'd argue that the Mopar 727 is the greatest automatic transmission of the classic era.

>>16433178
2-speed automatics are SHIIIIIIIIIIIIT.

Also, does anyone know anything about the Toyoglide transmission?

>>16433216
Was just a joke. We all know the Jetaway is really king.

I've got some new bushings coming through for the shackels on my ute, I believe they're accurate reproductions.
Should I grease the bushings before I install them?

>>16433248
Rubber? Some silicone grease will help you install them and improve their lifespan.

>>16433228
>Safety
Only relevant in a select band of speed.
>performance
Muscle cars set the standard and base models are still similar
>accessories
Have you had a '70s luxury make? Literally everything but the nigger tech is present.
>longevity
U wot m8
>gas mileage
Examples can be cherry picked, but it's no different than a lone MILF in a SUV.

>>16433259
Well, if nothing else, your stubbornness, refusal to accept reality, and point-to-point reply irrefutably proves you're on the spectrum.

Safety is relevant at every speed, you can survive going ridiculous speeds in some cars these days with the multi-layered protection they provide. Performance means more than horsepower, you dingdong, but even in that category engines continue to get bigger and better. Tires wider and thinner, suspension, sway bars every single thing has been improved over the years. Name me one 70s luxury car that came stock with a bluray player, dingus. Cars do last longer these days, the anti-corrosive sprays have gotten much better since the 60s and 70s. You're just reaching on the gas one not even going to bother arguing that a sports car of today gets more than the 8mpg land yacht muscle cars of yesteryear. Not to mention emissions bullshit.

Again, I absolutely love my cars, but you're blind if you genuinely think a car from the 50s, 60s, or 70s is equal to a modern day car in objective testing.

>>16413353
Wow. That is some room. And I've got a crown vic.

File: IMG_6750.jpg (144KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 1024x768px

>>16417007
'69 Camaro SS. Aww yeah.

>>16421325
Wow, that's nice. I want one!

File: IMG_6727.jpg (35KB, 320x214px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 320x214px

>>16426776
>objectively worse
From a safety standpoint, yeah. But they're waaay easier to work on (60's truck here) and the styling... THE STYLING!

>>16433131
It's not autism. It's masculinity. It's what men do.

Men drink whiskey, smoke cigars, have a job, shoot, and work on cars.

While I'm certainly not saying that everyone here does it to prove their masculinity, it's certainly a part of everyone here.

It's an appreciation for working in life. Working on cars, putting time and money into 'em, and getting something beautiful out of it. Especially today, when most people would rather have their cars drive themselves, and view them as disposable products.

In that way... It's masculine. Traditional. Down-to-earth.

At least, I think so. And that's why I think so many chicks dig a guy that's into classics.

File: Miata_Chosen_for_Picture.jpg (132KB, 640x884px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 640x884px

>>16428588
>inb4 "I didn't like how soft it was on my ass and now my boyfriend pounds me in my miata" or equally fabricated BS

New Zealand government's gay & lesbian guide used the Miata.

>>16433305
>Cars do last longer these days, the anti-corrosive sprays have gotten much better since the 60s and 70s
Doesn't matter when you car kills itself after 10 years because electronics are shit and were designed to be shit as well as completely necessary for the whole thing to run in the first place so you need to come back for a new one and keep the market alive and well.

>>16433305
>you replied = autism confirmed
Not an argument. Autistic people are usually correct, anyway.

Blu-ray = nigger tech. When the rest of the electronics fail, modern cars will be scrapped. No vehicle made today will be operable in 20 years without nigger-rigging computers to keep them running.

Not every car got 8 MPG. A 1960 Studebaker averages 17:
http://www.fuelly.com/car/studebaker/lark/1960

A 1964 Falcon got a combined 18 MPG.
http://www.automobile-catalog.com/make/ford_usa/falcon_usa_2gen/falcon_usa_2gen_base_2-door_sedan/1964.html

The Ford Taurus averages 23 MPG
http://www.fuelly.com/car/ford/taurus

5 MPG difference in comparable commuter cars is pretty close.

>>16434103
>No vehicle made today will be operable in 20 years without nigger-rigging computers to keep them running.
I like classics as much as the next guy but that's what they said about supras, skylines, vr4s (semi true) and other Japanese cars. They'll work as well as they're maintained.

>>16434103
It's not that you replied, it's the way you replied.

>>16433984
Both of you can fuck right off with your boomer logic, planned obsolescence has been a key component of US manufacturing since the late 1940s. We discuss 50s/60s/70s almost exclusively in this general, so none are exempt. Also plenty of 80s car trims like the Camaro Belinetta were loaded with shit electronics that controlled everything, and they still function fine.

>>16434103
Yeah bud but that Taurus gets better mileage while being better in every single objective way than the Falcon. The Taurus is faster, has better brakes, better handling, is safer, and has more and way better accesories

>>16434597
>Faster
Taurus with Vulcan V6: 23lb/HP
Falcon with 140 I6: 29lb/HP
Falcon with 260(!!!) V8: 17lb/HP
Winner: Base V8 Falcon

>more and way better accessories
The Falcon has a heater and AM radio. What more do you need?

>>16434628
FM

>>16433193
go be poor somewhere else.

>>16434597
>>16434628
Also '64 was the last year for the 260, so next year got the 289 so EVEN MOAR power.

>>16434116
They have a built in aftermarket to keep them alive.

Nobody is going to have a 2016 Elantra 40 years from now.

>>16434650
Well that's what people said about darts and demons and shit box galaxies and what not

>>16434650
Because nobody is going to WANT a 2016 Elantra 40 years from now.

>>16434628
FM radio and an aux port
>Which I installed in the ferd

>>16434667
But all the good talk radio is on the AM band.

>>16434658
>Well that's what people said about darts and demons and shit box galaxies and what not
And so most were sent to the scrapyard.

Chevy built almost 100k Novas a year and while they are still available, nowhere near that amount is still roadworthy today.

>>16434675
I don't listen to talk radio. I listen to Google play mixes of classic and outlaw country.

>>16434678
So what's the difference between my obsession with classic American cars and moon dongs obsession with his daddies modded Genesis 3.8 r spec he rode around in back in the day?

My point is, not all cars get saved, but the idea that a modern car will just up and die is not true. If you just maintain or store it like any other car, it'll be fine.

>>16434628
>comparing net hp with gross hp
wew
The 289 Falcon does 0-60 in 10.9 seconds
The 2004 Taurus with the 3.0 does 0-60 in 9.7 seconds

>>16434698
Sorry I used the wrong 0-60 time
It's 9.8 for the 260
The 289 is significantly faster.

File: 20170105_113127.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

I made a list of all the problems with my new Lincoln:

File: Photo0242.jpg (95KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 1024x768px

>>16433534
wheres the huge blower tho?
even Bruce Willis in the el camino got a huge blower

>>16434103
I disagree with the assessment that no cars will be around; Mustangs and Corvettes will ALWAYS have aftermarket parts, as an example.

Some things, however, will be impossible to maintain and require adapting; like the 1981 through 1984 Imperial fuel injection system. I doubt that there's a single one still running it.

That may be the future; aftermarket parts adapted to the popular engines to keep them on the road, but cars like the 2003 KIA Optima will be virtually nonexistent; limited only to those that survived with functioning original equipment.

>>16434779
who needs a blower when you have a nitrous button on your shifter

>>16434660
This is literally what they said about the cars we jerk each other off about.

>>16434752
Your penmanship is very aesthetic and pleasing.

>>16434810
If they turn out to be reliable in 20 years, definitely. It won't be "Civic for 3k" it'll be "Elantra for 10k" lol

A 20 year old car gets you the best bang for the buck and poorfags like me know this.

>>16434820
Thank you. Fun fact: I wrote it with a 1951 Parker fountain pen; it would be smoother, were I not riding in a moving vehicle at the time.

Should I do it?

https://detroit.craigslist.org/mcb/cto/5907791109.html

>>16436003
>That frame rot
I'd pass

>>16413117
>no title
>great project truck
>just don't have the time
all the memes are there

>>16436019
Yeah, I know, it's just so hard to find a decently priced '61-'69 Continental. I gotta have them suicide doors, I just gotta.

>>16419468
what's the song at 6:45

>>16436091
Yeah that's the struggle

>>16432809
God damn that is a sharp motherfucker

File: 001.jpg (34KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 500x375px

What's the best muscle coupe for under 15k?

>>16436425
Define best

>>16436461
Subjectively best. Most aesthetically pleasing?

>>16436505
That's up to you then

>>16436512
No, it's up to you, and everyone else in the thread. A subjective question gets answered by the queried party with an response in the form of an opinion.

File: IMG_1992.jpg (91KB, 600x348px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 600x348px

>>16436425
If you can find one

File: 1407553720088.jpg (59KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 900x900px

>have two old cars
>people always criticizing my choices
>"even the cheapest new car these days is way better than classics in every way"
>"they aren't safe"
>"they aren't comfortable"
>"they can't handle"

>lose my DD to frame rot
>buy a recent base model econobox so I can save money on gas and put more cash into my project
>new econobox is a fucking rattletrap
>just sitting in a parking lot idling the whole car shakes
>wind finds its way through the door seals
>exhaust is loud inside the cabin despite being stock
>seat isn't comfortable
>ride is stiff, no body roll so it tends to kick out the rear end if the roads are moist (despite being FWD)
>I4 engine is weak as fuck and only produces usable power at the top of its range, have to rev it too high to start or overtake someone. fucking shit compared to even a weak V8.
>I don't feel safe, comfortable, or confident in its handling abilities
>don't even have power equipment because it's the base model, have to roll my windows down with my arm muscles like some kind of cave-dwelling savage
>doesn't even have a tach, just a light that tells you when you hit the redline
>my previous car was way better despite being 22 years older
>literally the only thing this car has going for it is the gas economy
>mfw people tell me modern cars are superior to classics

File: DSC_0026.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

I bought it for 1700

File: DSC_0028.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>16436649

File: DSC_0029.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>16436654
So comfy

File: ford torino gt.jpg (3MB, 3599x1668px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3599x1668px

>>16436521
I can tell you what I think is the most aesthetically pleasing ('70/'71 torino), but to assume that I know what appeals to you would be just an act of ego.

File: DSC_0030.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>16436661

File: DSC_0031.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>16436665

File: DSC_0032.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

>>16436671

File: DSC_0033.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

>>16436674

>>16436678
>>16436678
>>16436678
>>16436678
////nuThread
>>16436678
>>16436678
>>16436678
>>16436678
>>16436678

>>16434779
I don't know, it just doesn't look right without an Aussie mad-max style blower.

>>16434597
Sure, but it looks like ass and is complicated to work on.

So they'll all be run into the ground while that falcon's driving around putting a smile on someone's face.

Because that's what classic cars do. They're adorable.

>>16434810
Not this time. I hope.

>>16436752
>>16436736
new thread fagguette

>>16436662
That totally works for me, man. I just wanted your personal choice, I do get I'm likely not speaking to an omniscient being across a congolese trading card board. Sorry for the confusion.