20k €

>>16369777
Corvette

>>16369777
S2k too old
MX5 too slow
so the best bet is the 86.

>>16369777
>mx5
gey
>s2000
maybe the '06
>gt86
meme car

File: 121109977.jpg (119KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1200x675px

Here's my choice

File: IMG_5860.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>16369777
Mx5 or s2000

>>16370269
considered it, but came to the conclusion it's too ugly for 30k

>>16370251
The mx5 is the best looking
The s2000 is the most fun
The gt86 is probably the fastest

File: BedfordRascal009.jpg (178KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 1024x768px

>>16369777
For £20 I'd get a Bedford Rascal

>>16370301
>mom, i posted it again

File: daihatsu-midget-09.jpg (43KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 600x450px

>>16370301
i'll raise you a midget.

>>16370326
Wise choice sir, wise choice

>>16369777
the 124 looks better than the mx5 but doesn't have a hardtop unfortunately.

E92 335i is best. Not some anemic jap shit

File: 1479368638317.png (88KB, 205x256px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 205x256px

>>16370289
>It's better in every way

>but it looks 'ugly'

>>16370334
It's also slower

File: abarth fiata.jpg (42KB, 700x465px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 700x465px

>>16369777

>>16370286
you put that Honda inside right now mister!

File: 1438578268551.gif (3MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 320x240px

>>16370520
>slower than an MX5

>>16370533
looks cooler, and isn't associated with the homosexual community

>>16370533
Nuh uh, I don't think so. Why do you care anyways?

>>16370372
how pigfat it is

>>16370505
It costs 50% more and its 100% worse lmao

>>16370520
Hmm il look into that. Abarth symbol makes me dubious

File: blogger-image--1628565429.jpg (58KB, 312x312px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 312x312px

>>16370520
more like a barf ayyyyyyyyyy

>>16370584
approx 3366 - 3500, the weight reports
vary

Used 86 and WRX engine.