What went wrong?
Nothing
>>16366647
>pigfat
>unreliable
>claims luxury but isnt
>claims ultimate driving machine but isnt
>doesnt know what it wants to be
>is slower than a corolla
>is less reliable than a corolla
>is less luxurious than a corolla
>>16366647
What used to be German craftsmanship has become a make-work program for Somalis.
>>16366657
>>16366677
Everything's fine you guys
>>16366647
>tfw I remember when I was a kid and an M badge meant serious business
>there was only the M3, M5, and very rarely an M6
>now there are M badged crossover
It's just disgusting is what it is.
///M died after the E46
>>16366695
Work at a BMW plant, can confirm... slow, nothing is ///M about those.
>>16366716
The ///M2 is actually ace.
>>16366931
>ace because it's the least shit of all the m shit
nah
yuropoor regulations. The sound that m4 make is so sad. No wonder why the mustang gt manage to get decent sale numbers in Europe.
They will probably end up like Mitsubishi motors except that BMW will be popular.
>>16366700
Yeah I don't get that at all, I can accept an m2, m4 and fuck it even an m7 if they want. But they shouldn't be adding an M to anything that has more than 1 letter in its model.
>>16366647
///M lost its soul. Even BMW's CEO wanted to get rid of it at one point.
>>16366931
You know it's not ace when your car plays fake engine sounds through the speakers...
>>16366716
>>16366931
>///
You guys are faggots and precisely why the M division has lost it's glory: They keeps trying to cater to douchebags with shit taste like you.
>>16366716
i think it died after the e92 really
>>16366647
Like every other car company sadly. They stick the badge on for money not performance.
>>16366647
This is what went wrong.
They showed that they are capable of so much when they made the M2, but they M4 turned out to be a miserable heap in comparison and yet they still had the audacity to ask for more money for it. Not to mention that if you wanted an M4 that was faster than the cheaper M2, you had to pay 2x the price of a regular M4.
>>16367940
I think it died after the 1 Series M. Or perhaps it's still alive only through the M2.
>135k
>>16366664
so why will the new Corollas use BMW engines then?
>>16368639
Idiot
Only partnership BMW and Toyota have is on the Supra/Z5. Toyota will use its own engine for the Supra, BMW will have its own for the Z5.
>>16367958
By your retarded logic the Flagship M5 is supposed to be an even quicker track monster than the M3/4.
>>16368671
Don't forget the X4
>>16368652
False
http://www.carbuzz.com/m/Article.aspx?Id=37040
http://indianautosblog.com/2016/12/bmw-could-supply-engine-for-next-gen-toyota-corolla-253103
>>16366664
You probably drive a shitbox. Please take your ignorance elsewhere poverish scum
>>16367958
The M4 was made before the M2.
Lap times and turbochargers.
They're numbers cars now, not drivers cars. Other than the m2.
>>16366647
Make ///M great again
>>16366664
>Claims sportiness but it isn't
FTFY
>>16368671
No, the M5 is a 4dr mid-sized sedan. The M2 and M4 however are both 2dr coupes. There's not enough distinct separation between the two and they're basically competing the same market.
>>16366647
The badge is meaningless now.
Any M3 pulls up to you and you dont even have to worry if you're in a semi decent car.