What the Challenger should've been

>>16357049
it looks awesome but it will never pass safety regulations.

move on, the 71 challenger was cool but it will never be made again

Mopar design is a joke if they think restomodding makes them unique. Come up with something fresh for the 2018 model year that both doesn't look like a bloated cow and comes with its own sense of style instead of borrowing from a 45 year old design

>>16358358
Fuck everything about your post

And Fuck FCA

cant they just pull their heads out of their ass?

All they need to do is make the new Challenger light as fuck

Delete the AWD
Delete the fuck ugly styling and slit window crap

>>16357049
>mfw people still trying to make a modern 71 challenger

Why? It's 40-50 years old now leave it back where they are and keep the heritage of a 70s muscle car now revive it with new shit.

The Challenger was the shittiest pony car.

>>16357049
This looks quite bad actually the interior is a joke
They just put modern part into a 1971 challenger

>>16357049
I don't know why but this reminds when Pontiac tried to bring back the GTO.

>it shouldve been an ugly riced out vintage Challenger

not it shouldnt have

>>16358396
The challenger is so big, even th 6.4L makes it seem slow.

File: 1482195173846.gif (327KB, 640x472px) Image search: [Google]

327KB, 640x472px

>>16359337
The R/T scat pack model hits 60 mph in 4.1 seconds for under $40k u fuck.

Barely anything else on the market you can buy that is that cheap, fast, and powerful.

File: Alfa-Romeo-Giulia-5589.jpg (274KB, 1600x1019px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 1600x1019px

>>16358396
That's exactly what they are doing for 2018 you nigger

>challenger/charger/300 will be based on new Alfa Romeo guilia platform
>cut 400-500 lbs
>new turbo 4, twin turbo pentastar V6, and hemi V8 engines
>manual trans