> pigfat GTO
All the tech wizardry of that thing made up for it¡s weight
>>16343779
>fast in a straight line and literal shit everywhere else
>>16344094
>/o/ - busriders benchracing
>>16343779
The aussie with the MR has posted his timeslips here before... it's not slow!
GTOs are one of those cars that are 8/10 when their working properly otherwise theyre about a 2/10
>>16344112
Not benchracing. He posted a pic a stating that the gto is faster than its contemporaries in a straight line, but everyone knows its shit everywhere else. As if that car having a lot of power to muscle its weight down a 1/4 mile stretch can make up for its barge status
>>16344198
Idiot bench racer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&persist_app=1&v=4ktKEaee51Q
>>16344954
so what, you bought an ancient sl fwd and now you're king shit eh
Someone post the picture where it's faster on track than an nsx or c4 vette
>>16343779
who was first?
>>16344094
>>16343897
>All the tech wizardry
What the hell are you on about kiddo?
There's no traction control, no anti-yaw, no launch control, no active differentials or torque splitting, no anti-slip- there is NOTHING in these cars, hell mine doesn't even have cruise control, all the electronic suspension, exhaust, aero kit and everything else remotely complicated got chucked in the bin.
About all that's really left is a lot less weight using the Z15 chassis, some ABS, 2 airbags and the EFI, the whole thing is so gronk-tastically agricultural that I've worked on tractors that had more complicated AWD systems!
What does matter is that it is lighter, has bucketloads of natural traction because its wide + long + AWD, with huge ass tyres and enough torque down low to rip out a tree stump. Sure its not nearly as graceful through corners like any of the Skylines, Silvias I've owned, but its not exactly terrible either with a good suspension set up.
>>16345941
>buy an i7 for a chance to win an Intel Beanie and Snowboard!
Linus, your company car is a pink spray painted civic. stop calling it a Lambo.
>>16343779
Why would Mazda put a torqueless wonder of a engine in a 2800lb chassis? I can see if it weighed 1800lbs but cmon, that's just bad engineering.