So, /o/, show me, what is the most aerodynamic car shape?

Aerodynamic is what way? Least drag coefficient or most down force?

File: 2PF3a.png (425KB, 701x526px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 701x526px

This one.

>>16331647
Least drag.

File: 7414735_orig.jpg (295KB, 1100x733px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 1100x733px

>>16331668
so you know stuff like this

File: aerodynamic.png (4KB, 848x138px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 848x138px

>>16331623

>>16331649
You see Ivan, encase body in ice on roof, no evidence in trunk.

>>16331706
That's actually less aerodynamic than a smooth arc or dimpled surface.

File: SOLARCAR.jpg (28KB, 650x423px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 650x423px

>>16331652
Solar race cars then. They're made to be as light and aerodynamic as possible, yet don't go fast enough to require downforce.

>>16331706
That's not aerodynamic at all.

File: 96-97_Ford_Taurus_.jpg (151KB, 2244x1236px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 2244x1236px

The answer is third generation Ford Taurus.

The answer is always third generation Ford Taurus

File: superbirdrr.jpg (846KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

846KB, 1920x1080px

Not the most but pretty good for a 1970's car. 0.29 Drag coefficient vs 0.24 for a Tesla

>>16331771
Th e answer is never third generation Ford Taurus. For anything, It is literally never the answer.

>>16331831
>.30 drag coefficient
>God-tier reliability of the Vulcan V6
>Comfy as fuck

THIRD GENERATION FORD TAURUS IS THE ANSWER

THIRD GENERATION FORD TAURUS IS ALWAYS THE ANSWER

>>16331831
What mid-size sedan did Ford start production of in 1995?

Third generation Ford Taurus.

Q.E.D

File: mercedes fishy.jpg (40KB, 468x562px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 468x562px

Literally everybody ITT is wrong.

File: 1431736401566.jpg (76KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 720x720px

this
i mean just look at how baddass and fast its going

File: uppess.jpg (65KB, 640x414px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 640x414px

>>16331733
>dimpled surface
wow

i hope it doesn't make that much of a difference bvecause it looks awfu

File: luaz-969-a-09.jpg (281KB, 888x600px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 888x600px

It's this.

>>16331857
a peugeot 405 as a better grad coefficient tough

File: Felt.jpg (161KB, 907x757px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 907x757px

>>16334873
Nah, my old Volvo was much more aerodynamic!

File: 2te116-1539.jpg (69KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 800x600px

>>16334906
Fuck. I like how they even bothered at all to give it a front though. A 2TE116 has better aerodynamics that this.

File: wiener.jpg (35KB, 650x212px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 650x212px

>>16332751

>>16331799
Yeah but it's also huge and increases even the drag adjusted frontal area.

File: a40f1c27-add5-4f20-99cb-0e94ce47a4eb..png (103KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1920x1080px

>>16331623
this

File: international speed criminal international getaway car.jpg (143KB, 672x448px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 672x448px

>>16337697

File: Audi~A2~(2).jpg (41KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 640x427px

>>16331623
you faggots arent even trying

File: weinermobile.png (842KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

842KB, 1000x1000px

>>16334968

File: American Speed Records.jpg (2MB, 2760x1846px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2760x1846px

>>16340827

>>16331741
he said cars not fish

File: does not have pushrods.jpg (148KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1200x800px

>>16340957
>Henneshit
>fast

top kek