ITT: Choose a car from each decade you'd be willing to own.

File: Template.png (132KB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 2400x2100px

Template

>>16320530
Fug, an actually nice and interesting thread idea. Will have to post once I know my answers.

File: 4chan.png (4MB, 2896x2100px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2896x2100px

>>16320530

>>16320712
too bad I'm yuropoor, my absolute dream car is the 67 eldorado with 8.2l v8 or 71 sedan deville with very rare optional 8.2l v8

File: 1481760294055.jpg (1MB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2400x2100px

this was easy

>>16320738
is that a morgan on the first picture?

>>16320841
yes

80s AW11
90s E30
00s NB mx5
10s Honda Fit

>>16320738
is that a jaguar on the second picture?

>>16320878
yes

>>16320530
Forgot to mention that you'll only be able to own the cars you put in the image until the next decade rolls around.

>>16320738
is that a porsche on the third picture?

>>16320912
Im too lazy to keep going along with this

Morgan
Jaguar
Porsche
Porsche
Porsche
RUF
Porsche
RUF
Porsche

File: Decade picks.png (4MB, 2900x1982px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2900x1982px

Can't believe i wasted so much time on this but good thread and hopefully it picks up steam.

>>16321309
>all that wasted empty white space

took all that time and i still fucked it up.

>>16320724
>8.2l V8
>200HP

The 70's were great

File: dreamdecadedsgarage1.jpg (1MB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2400x2100px

here's mine op

File: tumblr_mus3wmYdph1qk65n6o1_1280.jpg (824KB, 1280x1520px) Image search: [Google]

824KB, 1280x1520px

>>16321359
>Stock green two-tone S13
Excellent taste. Was going to choose that myself.

>>16320530
80's
not to techy and not to mechy.

>>16321366
It's the best looking Silvia imo

>>16320530

>Pre-war
1937 Chrysler Imperial 5.3 Flathead
>1940s
1946 Dodge Power Wagon
>1950s
1959 Plymouth Fury Sport Coupeville 361ci
>1960s
1969 Dodge Coronet Super Bee
>1970s
1970 Dodge Charger 500
>1980s
1986 Shelby GLHS
>1990s
1994 Dodge Stealth R/T Twin Turbo
>2000s
2007 Dodge Ramsey SRT-10
>2010s
2015 Dodge Viper ACR

>>16321677

I Fucking hate autocorrect.

im surprised no one chose a mclaren f1, ferrari f40/f50 enzo, lambo miura yet.

>>16321887

Why have any of those when I could have a giant slab of American Steel and too much displacement?

>>16321887
probably because thats like one of the most boring lists you could do

File: DSC_0793.jpg (1MB, 1280x850px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x850px

>>16321887
Not everyone is into supercars.

>>16321887
>every gta5 player ever

File: 1481760294055.jpg (1MB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2400x2100px

Here.

>>16321887
go back to r/cars faggot

File: 1481760294055.jpg (1MB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2400x2100px

>>16320530

>>16320712
>those niggermobiles in the end
absolutely disgusting

>>16321887
Got you anon :^)
See >>16322395. 80s was hard as fuck to me so I picked the one that I desired the most, but it could have been
>F40
>3rd gen Trans Am
>Corvette C4
>Lamborghini Jalpa
>Porsche 930
>AMG Hammer
>Ferrari 308
>Ferrari 288
>Porsche 959

>>16322363
I'd think being "le ironic xd" would be a reddit thing
You can't call yourself a car enthusiast if you haven't looked at a supercar with lust

File: 1441980553872.jpg (119KB, 800x517px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 800x517px

>>16322395
>Posts the 80s as fuck version of the Countach

>>16322409
It's a 1979 :^)
My 90s pick is 80s as fuck too.

>>16322413
Oh and my 00s pick is 80s as fuck too hahahaha
I was going to pick a Zonda but then I said "fuck the 2000s" and picked the G-wagen

File: 7098ac61cd0b20118756595232f64b83.jpg (250KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 1024x768px

>>16322413
Oh fug, it's actually 80s, it has the bulge
let me correct my mistake

File: 1978-1982-lamborghini-countach-lp400-s-838_8098_969X727.jpg (108KB, 969x554px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 969x554px

>>16322430
>5000
lel, I fucked up even further

File: rsz_11rsz_1481760294055.png (3MB, 1800x1575px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1800x1575px

Pre WW3: 1934 Chrysler Airflow
40's: 1949 Ford Coupe
50's: 1957 Plymouth Fury Christine replica\
60's: 1967-1969 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
70's: 1976 Lancia Scorpion
80's: 1984-1988 Pontiac Fiero
90's: 1991-1993 Toyota Celica GT-Four ST185
00's: 2007-2013 Suzuki SX4 Turbo
10's: 2013-2015 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE

>>16322607
Nice weaboo shit, nerd

File: RUN.jpg (1MB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2400x2100px

>>16320530
I think the m2 is a little overkill, so I went for a m235 for the 2010's

>>16322628
>90% American stuff
>2 Japanese cars
>1 Italian car
>Weeaboo
no. You need to recheck your definitions bub. Aside from the Toyota, Suzuki, and Lancia, that list is all American.

>>16322872
>Aside from the Toyota, Suzuki, and Lancia, that list is all American.
Only because the japs started making half decent cars in the late 80s

>>16320738
is that a porsche on the fourth picture?

>>16322912
pretty much. Before that, they were quirky and reliable, but aside from the Datsun Z cars and the rare 2000GT, they didn't make anything interesting.

>>16320738
Is that a porsche on the fifth picture?

>>16320530
That's a 1970's Ghia not a 50's one the lights and air intakes are all wrong for the 50's cars.

File: ej0315-211680_1.jpg (94KB, 832x468px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 832x468px

>>16320530
>pre war is one generation
End your life.

>>16322956
All but the first 2 images are Porsche's/

>>16321309
Nice picks

>>16322607
>Suzuki SX4 Turbo
You're joking right?

>>16322408
>you can't call yourself a car enthusiast if you don't like supercars

Or maybe i prefer stuff that's cheaper to work on

File: 2008-road-race-motorsports-suzuki-sx4t-photo-240425-s-1280x782.jpg (176KB, 1280x782px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 1280x782px

>>16322982
>You're joking right?
nope. Road Race Motorsports makes a turbo kit for the car that was sold through Suzuki dealers for the SX4.
They made a few concept cars to promote it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkytX2A1bO0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aD2ZgHrFLCw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhPeG-6ujGE

File: -o-.jpg (4MB, 3432x2625px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3432x2625px

>>16320530

>>16322992
all the parts used to build the concepts were also available at the dealer or at Road Race Motorsports.
The idea was to strike a deal with an aftermarket performance parts company to make performance parts for the car that could be sold at the dealership as add-on accessories that wouldn't void the warranty, similar to what Scion did with TRD.
The overall idea was to use that one company to help establish the SX4 in the American tuner car scene, court the car modders and hopefully boost sales of the car.

It didn't work and Suzuki left the US market after 2013, but Road Race Motorsports still offers all the parts from their Suzuki partnership.

Overall, the SX4 was a promising base for a tuner car. very reliable, well built 2.0L I4 that takes boost well, available in FWD or AWD, an IRS, and they have great chassis dynamics making them as fun to drive as just about any Mazda.

File: dream car.png (3MB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2400x2100px

>>16320530

>>16322607
Why the 1LE and not the superior ZL1?

File: 1481760294055.jpg (2MB, 4000x2100px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4000x2100px

>>16320530
Already got my other dream 70s car so...

>>16323161
I don't worship the temple of horsepower. I'm perfectly fine with a N/A track weapon with the great noise of a GM V8. The ZL1 is only faster due to the supercharger and magnetic suspension, which I could live without.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtmku2Lw5es
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rTJPDurLEKw

>>16323161
450hp is a lot of power, don't be mistaken. That's more power than a late 90s 911 turbo or almost as much as a Ferrari f40

>>16323194
2010-2015 Camaro SS's had either 426 HP or 400 HP depending on the transmission. Automatics were rated lower.
2016+ Camaro SS's are the ones with 450 HP

File: roastme.jpg (713KB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

713KB, 2400x2100px

Wish I could put MR2 or 964, but fuck it, roast me
>decade garage, normie edition

File: 1481733671965.jpg (152KB, 656x1024px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 656x1024px

>only one slot for pre-WW2
>expecting me to own 70s or 80s horse shit instead

File: ferrari_288_gto_27.jpg (804KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

804KB, 2048x1536px

>>16323241
>Preferring tin pieces of shit to the excellent engineering of the 70s and 80s

File: Tatra-87-Oldtimer-Januar-2015-7.jpg (185KB, 1600x765px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 1600x765px

>>16323743
You mean coke fueled, rattly, early plastic adopters madness.

>>16321309
nice taste
t. testarossa guy

>>16322998
testarossa guy here, 1940s to 1960s and 1990s were all cars I considering posting

>>16323233
nice merc ripoff lol

>>16323798
>coke fueled
>implying there's anything wrong with that

>>16323987
>choose a car from each decade
>A CAR

>>16323990
>ignore others who posted truccs
>bitches about mine

Why

>>16324005
>A

>>16324005
Oh wait fuck now I know what you meant.... Disregard your (You)

File: 1435023760013.jpg (100KB, 876x960px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 876x960px

>>16324016
I'd take the MOPAR and the Ferd of the 2 split ones tbqh

too tired to play this. Awesome idea tho.

I'll take
Alfa Quadrifoglio for 2010's
E39 M5 for 2000's and
Gt r34 nismo for 90's.
for 80's - 288 GTO master race
for 70's - De Tomaso Pantera
for 60's - 1968 SUPER STOCK HEMI BARRACUDA

http://static.cargurus.com/images/site/2009/11/21/09/04/1968_plymouth_barracuda-pic-8132255589160838271.jpeg

for 50's and earlier - dunno. Might update. Whatever is most valuable so I can sell it and buy new cars.

>>16324073

LaFerrari for 2010's
Lambo Reventon for 2000's
Mclaren F1 for 90's
288 GTO for 80's
Miura for 70's
for 60's - 1968 SUPER STOCK HEMI BARRACUDA


I made a little update.

>>16321887
Yeah, it's almost like my tastes aren't that of a 15 year old.

>>16324091
>when a 15 year old has better taste than you
Must feel bad

>>16324086

And Id drive them no mercy style.

Corner bakery?
Lets take the Miura

Pizza date in Italy?
Take the LaFe

Night cruise?
Reventon shadow mode or Cuda, depending how many ppl I want to wake up.

Id use F1 for towing my 288 GTO

hahahahaha

Love this game. Make more similar stuff.

>>16324095
>t. 15 year old

>>16324095
Yeah bro, sikkkk lambo pictures on your bedroom wall.

>1930 Lancia Lambda S.8
>1940 Tatra 87
>1955 Citroen 15CV Traction Avant
>1962 Pontiac Tempest
>1973 Citroen DS23
>1989 Dodge Caravan Turbo
>1999 Lexus LS400
>2009 Toyota Land Cruiser 70
>2017 Tesla Model S 100D
Too much of a perfectionist to hack up an MS Paint image on this crummy laptop with no access to Photoshop. Generally feeling unhappy about several of my choices.

>>16324113
>Too much of a perfectionist to hack up an MS Paint image on this crummy laptop with no access to Photoshop.
pixlr.com/editor
You're welcome
>Generally feeling unhappy about several of my choices.
Same, would be easier for me if it was 1 car from each year in the 80s
t. testarossa guy

>>16322395
>1990s
Is that a weird Diablo?

>>16324144
that's Cizeta Moroder V16T

>>16324144
no

the Diablo is a weird Cizeta

File: 1424904510838.png (743KB, 685x1433px) Image search: [Google]

743KB, 685x1433px

>>16324103
Yeah, you don't like supercars, sure. You'd rather have some shitbox even if you could afford them, we all know that's true.

>>16324132
I generally don't feel a particular way about many eras of cars which in my eyes haven't brought forth mentionworthy technological achievements. I'd only get a post 1990 car for daily driving or utility, not collectability, apart from the Tesla. In return there are earlier decades where several cars spark my interest. Luckily I was able to cram three pre-war cars in there because they maintained production during or after the war, but I'd have even more in mind.

>>16324144
It's a Cizeta V16T. Look it up. Literal V16 engine.

>>16324154
some of us actually don't care about the dick waving contest that supercars are and are perfectly fine with the sizes of our dicks

>>16324154
They're boring AF m8. They're objects of amusement for the people who build them and 12 year olds.

They also arr rook same. 3/4 of them are all the same humped wedge. Not even visually interesting. A 900hp AMC I6? That's interesting.

>>16324154
Super cars are amazing, but they literally exist for kids to put posters on their walls and old fucks to take out to C&C once a year and wreck. To the average automotive enthusiast they are completely impractical. You can't even work on most of them, and why would you considering how expensive they are to begin with.

So no, I don't give a fuck about any of those and they don't fit the bill for a dream car.

File: photo.jpg (173KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 900x900px

>>16324154
Fuck off Rob.

>Implying an air cooled 911 isn't far more interesting than the latest Ferrari Diabloghini Testa-roaster.

File: Porsche-930-Gemballa-Avalanche-white-pearl-1986-03ESK262848889C.jpg (62KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 400x300px

>>16324151
>>16324152
beat me to it guys
t. testarossa guy
>>16324156
I know how you feel, although I'm not crazy about most pre-war or 40s cars. I have a thing for huge cars with huge wheels like the Bugatti I posted though. And perhaps I could have picked a '59 Cadillac instead of the 507, but it's so exclusive that if I could have any 50s car I'd probably still pick the 507. I thought about putting the Traction Avant too but again it's too common. The Alfa from the 60s doesn't fully make me crazy about it but again, the other options are relatively common cars. Thinking about it I'd probably rather get a Ferrari Daytona.
Also just found out the 540K was produced until 1940, I'd get a 540K-Autobahnkurier instead of that Alfa.

>>16324161
>>16324171
>>16324197
>>16324207
Sure thing. I may be a poorfag but at least I have the sincerity to admit I'd love to have certain cars that are only available to the wealthiest of the world. I am well aware I would never want to step out of a Lambo.
>>16324207
Air cooled 911s aren't out of the menu. They're still cars for the elite. My pick? 930. Posting a Gemballa just for the lulz.

>>16324218
>Sure thing. I may be a poorfag but at least I have the sincerity to admit I'd love to have certain cars that are only available to the wealthiest of the world.

You're the type of person that goes full nigger when they get some money. You fucking admit it yourself, you like the cars because they're a status symbol for your poor ass, not because of the characteristics of the vehicle.

>>16324154
I dig you fox posting man.

Most peeps cannot imagine owning a Ferrari and driving it like a regular car. Scarcity mindset.

It's weird how somewhere along the line, people stop believing in themselves and their dreams/goals.

I find it hard to even convince some of my friends to just open their mind to the possibility of having certain good things in life.

No wonder few peeps succeed in life. They stop thinking its possible.

I went trough some similar thought process too.

Those same guys are those inflating the prices of old ae86 and E30's. When enough of them want the old cars, they make them valuable again hahaha. Causing the same thing they ran away from.

File: vlcsnap-2015-06-18-12h10m02s56.png (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x720px

>>16324161
Also
>the dick waving contest that supercars are and are perfectly fine with the sizes of our dicks
Seems like you feel insecure and would be worried about people saying you're "compensating". Saying that if you get nice things you're compensating is typical of insecure jealous pussy whipped little shits, who not only feel inadequate but also can't afford awesome cars and end up settling for a shitty Prius. They look at a muscle car, a lifted truck, a full size car, a supercar or some nice guns and say the owner is "compensating". Bullshit, that's what they tell themselves to feel better about their own situation. The typical questions they ask?
>why do you need such a big truck
>why do you need so much horsepower
>why do you need so many guns
>why do you need such a flashy car

I ride the bus for now (in college in the third world) but let me assure you I won't be caught dead talking shit of someone because he has a nice ride. You will likely see me lashing out at the morons who do stupid shit like stancing, tire stretching, hanging plastic balls from a truck or ricing though.

>>16324279
Dream car from an era =/= wanting to daily drive a Ferrari

>>16324274
>you like the cars because they're a status symbol for your poor ass, not because of the characteristics of the vehicle.
You misinterpreted my words. The reason I desire the more exclusive cars is because of their rarity, because if I could have any wish granted I wouldn't waste it in something I can obtain by my own means, I'd get something I could normally not get and that I lust for with intensity. A Duesenberg is probably more expensive and exclusive than any of the ones I picked, but I don't find it cool. I'd rather have a Countach.
>>16324279
Thanks man. Also I love E30s too. Hopefully I'll be able to own a 318is some day. Straight 6 master race.

>>16324290
all that projection
all that triggered
all that tryhard

what a faggot

>>16324312
I love E30's too hahaha. I guess there's a bit of both in all of us. The big spender and budget racer.

File: garage.jpg (611KB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

611KB, 2400x2100px

>>16320530
Meme lord

>>16324312
>You misinterpreted my words. The reason I desire the more exclusive cars is because of their rarity
would you believe there are rarer and more exclusive cars you can by cheap?
Example: The Lancia Scorpion. 1,807 were built in total. For 2 model year. It's even got that italian mid-engined exotic thing going on.
You can pick them up for under 10k mint.

And Jeremy Clarkson once pointed out the Aston Martin DB9 sold more than the Ford Mondeo ST220.

>>16324320
The only projection I see is from the ones who see anyone with better stuff than them and say "he must have a small dick and is compensating for it". News flash, a nice car won't make your dick grow. However I'd rather have a nice car than a shitbox.
>>16324326
It's not just a matter of budget, I find them incredibly sexy. I'd rather have an E30 than a brand new 3 series. To me, BMW lost a big deal of its personality and aggressiveness when it switched from the boxy style with separated round headlights style to the more modern one. My favorite bimmers are E34s and E30s. I also dig the E31 and E38 though.
I have similar feelings about Benz, loved them until the W201, W124 and W140, although I've started seeing awesome Benzes in the last years. Wouldn't be caught dead in a W210 or W211.
>>16324343
Looked it up, didn't like it. And the Mondeo ST is still a Mondeo, it isn't comparable.
I'd rather have a Delorean even if it's cheaper and less exclusive. Or a 1984 Trans Am.
My point is, of my dream cars, for this "one car per decade thing" I pick the most exclusive of them. I love the Trans Am with a passion, but I know I will be able to get it by myself with relative ease. However, the Testarossa is much harder. Still obtainable (I'll be an engineer soon) but harder. Besides, that V12. Remember we're talking about having ANY car from each era. I love the Jalpa and the 930 for example, but I wouldn't rather have them than a Testarossa.

>>16324380
sounds like theyre right on the money and it triggers you tbqh

>>16324380
I was thinking the same, I grew up dreaming about E30 and E34. I was the guy talking BMW went to shit after e46.

But now Im older, E30 is overmeemed to death, and basically any older BMW is raped by teens.

BMW started making handsome cars again, and when I opened myself to the idea I found it Id rather own a newer than older one.

Id lie if I'd say some shitboxes dont carry a certain appeal tho.

>>16324398
This. They're right about the high end exotics and it bothers you that what is supposed to be adored and lusted over isn't.

File: tommy versweatty.png (29KB, 149x149px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 149x149px

>>16324404
I'm even more extreme lol, I think it went to shit after the E36.
About the new ones, it's true they're looking better, but still not as good as they used to. If I were to get a brand new premium car I'd rather have a Giulia (admittedly a 3 series ripoff, but prettier) than a 3 series.
>>16324398
How so? I ride the bus. The only thing triggering me here is the smug sanctimoniousness. Seems like the liberals' world revolves around their dicks since that's all they can think about.
I have a lot of stuff I'd like to spend money in, but a cock enlargement isn't one of them.
I'd probably get a Rosso Corsa Testarossa, a Skarab 38KV, a Bell 47 and a nice house by the beach with an helipad on top.
>>16324468
Heh, as if they aren't being a bunch of tryhards by outshitboxing each other.

>>16324528
spotted the GM fangirl :^)

>>16324539
ye das me

File: oooo.jpg (1MB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2400x2100px

It would be different everytime I'd do it

>>16323227
nice meme/10

File: images.jpg (9KB, 297x170px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 297x170px

>>16324547
I was just pulling your leg haha. That said, seeing all the drag cars doing wheelies made me chuckle. The last Camaro looks specially comical for some reason. And I'd love a 70s van too, specially a conversion one with a limo-tier interior. Think Scooby Doo movie.
The 2-lane blacktop chevy is awesome too.
Why no Corvette though?

File: 196.jpg (148KB, 494x412px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 494x412px

>>16324565
Nice picks anon, what's the ugly 60s thing though?

>>16324600
Chrysler turbine car

>>16324651
That changes everything. 10/10 would own.

>>16320532
>even included transparency
You're the real MVP.

File: lolvo.jpg (896KB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

896KB, 2400x2100px

fuck, something went wrong

>>16324793
>t. olof
Shouldn't you be getting triggered by getting accused of cuckoldry by the French?

>>16324802
but i'm an amerilard, i just have an unhealthy love of bricks

>>16324819
oh I thought you were that stupid swedish tripfag
for the record, I like Volvos too, although the 200 series aren't my favorite ones. I'd love to have a 960 or S90 level 3 some day.

>>16324823
Oh and I forgot the 1800ES

File: 660px-Renault_Avantime_01.jpg (66KB, 660x331px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 660x331px

>>16322998
>>16323839

>Avantime
What makes this car so appealing? I remember a Top Gear episode where the three presenters mentioned it was probably the only car that all three of them could agree was great, but I can't recall the specific reasons why.

>>16321915

>nice nice meh
>nice noice ew
>nice FAG nice

/blog

>tfw on mobile

>>16320738
nice Beetles, anon

>>16324565
nice

what's that pre-WWII car?

>>16324948
Looks like a Duesey

>>16322998
absolutely god-tier taste

>>16324845
I think it was space, ride, comfort and relative compactness, it did its job very well
plus it was surprisingly sporty for a minivan

File: asser1196708aIrwindaleDitty750-vi.jpg (48KB, 640x453px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 640x453px

>>16324594
Idk, just not much of a corvette guy, unless it's a c1/2 gasser or pro street. I was raised on a chevelle, then a nova, then two camaros and now another nova so that may be why no 'vettes on my list

>>16322998
>Traction
>Avantime
Good taste.

>>16325040
Good taste anon, also what's the 2000s one? Some Aston Martin?
What is the last one? At first I thought it was the Alpine concept.

>>16322962
RUFs arent Porsches

>>16325161
2000's - Aston Martin One-77
2010's - Aston Martin AM-RB 001

>>16325173
And Alpinas aren't BMWs, Maybachs aren't Mercedes, Hennessy Venom isn't a Lotus and your mother is a virgin.

>>16325174
Nice
>>16325185
I kek'd

>>16325185
they arent

the BMW vin is blocked out and replaced with a Alpine

Maybach is actually Mercedes now

still titled as a Lotus so its a Lotus

RUF literally builds their own car but with a Porsche based body so it has their own VIN

>>16325201
fucking kek

>>16325201
>replacing parts with your own low weight versions, adding a cage and boring out and turbocharging the engine is "building your own car"
top kek

>>16325201
So if I scratched out a civics vin and stuck a Ferrari one on top its therefore a different car?

RUF is a tuner, nothing more.

>>16325254
>>16325231

double kek top kek lol mega kek unkekkable overkek kekgeddon

>>16325259
no they tune and build

you can pretend otherwise but youre wrong

all they use when they build their own cars are the bodies

>>16325266
So they make their own engines, Transmissions, Brakes, Wheels?

>>16325270

who da fook makes his own brakes and discs?

its not the 80' jeez

>>16325273
They don't make their own engines either, they tune Porsche engines.

>>16325273
Porsche. Ha!

>>16325270
>engines

they made their own V8

of course the standard engines they use are Porsche blocks tuned to shit I imagine

>Transmissions

yes

one of the first big things they did was make a 5 speed transmission for the 930


>brakes

yes at least they sale their own brakes dunno if they actually make them

>wheels

hardly any car company does this they have their own wheels but theyre made be a big wheel company like most

File: DECADE GARAGE.jpg (2MB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2400x2100px

This was unexpectedly fun. It was really kind of hard to pick and choose just 1 per decade though.

File: image3078.png (3MB, 1871x1637px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1871x1637px

easier than expected.

File: 3.0-CSL-at-Thornhill-Cruisers-9388-e1477508327603-940x705.jpg (104KB, 940x705px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 940x705px

>>16325321
Pretty good. I dig the E9.

File: BEST CARS.png (4MB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2400x2100px

I don't really know that much about 1940's cars or before.

>>16325327
My current project is the 4-door version :) I'd be all over a csl if I had the resources.

>>16325298
Did the V8 actually make it into production, or did it just stay as a prototype? Because producing a flat crank engine for a handful of cars is retarded

>>16325370
they made 1 or 2 for production afaik along with a few protorype/show cars

>Because producing a flat crank engine for a handful of cars is retarded

tell that to any small volume car company in the world

>>16325399
>tell that to any small volume car company in the world
They already know.

File: chan garage.png (3MB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2400x2100px

ww2 - Fiat S76
40's - XK120
50's - Bmw 507
60's - Alpine A110 1800
70's - Subaru BRAT :)
80's - Subaru RX Turbo
90's - Mercedes w124 Hammer
00's - Lotus Evora
10's - Mercedes C63S AMG Wagon

>>16320530
>1950s
>posts a non-lowlight 60's ghia

BRUH

>>16325434
Damn son, 507, Alpine, Hammer. Good choices

File: Decade Garage.jpg (1MB, 1920x1680px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1680px

>>16325435
Fixed. Also changed my Pre-WWI choice.

>>16325315
>Olds 98, turd gen Firebird and a Caprice
Let's fuck.

File: o.png (4MB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2400x2100px

Have no ideas for 40s.

>>16322395
>>16324338
>70s
Wrong pictures there.

>>16325698
>Wrong pictures there.
I know, I already corrected my mistake. See >>16322446

>>16325315
>third gen Trans Am
Patrish. R8 me >>16322395

>>16325644
>1960s
I like your way of thinking. Should have lifted my pic though, I made it to fit the rectangle.

File: 1413681097899.jpg (2MB, 2000x1328px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2000x1328px

>>16325698
>Have no ideas for 40s.
When in doubt, choose the Tucker.

>>16322254
Last 4 are almost spot on (change the STI for Evo).

>>16322607
lol SX4

>>16323839
Don't know why but I threw up a little when I saw the Phantom Convertible

>>16324793
ha

>>16325315
I very much appreciate the labels on the pictures. Thanks.

>>16325434
>>16325464
Fiat with 28 liter inline 4 with 290hp. I like.

>>16325730
Not a fan of limmo looking sedans as you can see. Obviously a cool car tho.

>>16325720
>Countach, Testarossa and Cizeta
>G Wagen

no anon, YOU are the patrician.

>>16325582
>b-but anon, I'm saving myself for marriage!

>>16324312
>You misinterpreted my words. The reason I desire the more exclusive cars is because of their rarity, because if I could have any wish granted I wouldn't waste it in something I can obtain by my own means

No he was spot on. You literally only want them because you've managed to equate rarity with status in your retarded mind. You would probably equate a gaudy gold Rolex with status because you think it has an air of exclusivity while the rest of us think you look like a nigger that just cashed the check from his first single.

There are better cars that are more interesting. A fucking K swapped EG hatch with a massive turbo running circles on a Lamborghini is more interesting than the Lamborghini fresh off the lot.

>>16325730
surprised at how many people pick this ugly lemon

>>16325807
T-thanks anon

>>16325835
it's an interesting car from a decade most people cant really pick from. (same for pre-ww2) so when in doubt, pick the weird interesting car everyone knows

>>16325823
Nah m8, exclusivity isn't enough for me. It's just that among the cars I love I'd rather get the most exclusive if this is a "get any car you wish" type of deal. As I said earlier, a Duesenberg may be rarer and more expensive than any of the ones I picked, but it does nothing for me. It's just that picking something that I can easily get IRL seems like a waste to me. Imagine you rub an oilcan and the car genius offers to grant you one car from each decade. I wouldn't waste that in a diesel fiat.

>>16325835
>t. Homer S. Ferguson

>>16325862
No you'd wasted it on an generic exotic car that anyone can purchase off the lot, has absolutely nothing interesting you can do with it, and requires a specialized shop to remove the entire front clip to change the oil. Except you'd pick one generic exotic form each decade, then get upset that an enthusiast board laughs at your petulant lusting over cars that are more or less purchased for 16 year olds by rich parents as status symbols.

>>16325864
Tucker was a conman

>>16325892
>icons are generic
>V16T is generic
kys
I'd probably give one kidney to own a car with Giorgio Moroder's name on it

>>16325920
probably because your a memewave babby

its a generic af looking car

>>16325953
I agree it's generic, but it's generic because it was just the "in" thing to have supercars look like door wedges.
If I had to choose a good looking wedge car, I'd probably pick an Esprit, but the V16T isn't that bad looking, it just plays it safe.

File: 13384030554_SPLASH.jpg (25KB, 500x300px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x300px

>>16325953
>generic looking
It's not
>muh memewave
If you don't like Giorgio Moroder's music you're probably a faggot. I can picture the guys from Daft Punk laughing at you in their talkbox

>>16325967
I liked him before all the memewave garbage tho you probably look up Kavisnky after watching Drive and got to him

and yeah its generic af

it just has full retard tier popups

>>16325975
The retard tier popups make it nongeneric, lol. Also it's interesting because it's 2 V8s with a single crankshaft, the thing is crazy.
And although I love synthwave, I loved Moroder and 80s stuff way before I came in contact with synthwave. As you might have noticed from my posts, I'm a Miami Vice fan. Who else lusts for a Skarab 38KV?
Perhaps it would be better if I was someone seeking status, I mean at least I wouldn't be looking forward to larp as Sonny Crockett IRL.

>>16326006
nope its a completely generic design

small "LOOK AT ME" bits dont make it special

like someone stancing a Civic its still a generic car

Made a similar thread, but it's 80s only
have a look: >>16326008


>>16326012
It's only generic because after it came the Diablo. Back in the day there was nothing like it.

>>16326016
exactly

so it ends up looking generic

>>16326031
Only in retrospective, but in its day it wasn't generic at all. It was like a car from the future.

>>16326035
bruh

it came out with cars like the EB110 XJ220 C62 XRJ15 and the Diablo itself

it really doesnt look that futuristic compared to most of those

but anyhoo Ill try your 80s one simply because the 80s are my least favourite decade for cars and will be more of a challenge (unless I use RUF and Porsche for all the years)

>>16326052
>EB110
Never looked good
>C62
Looks like a generic Le Mans racing car
>XJ220
>XJR15
You have a point there

>Diablo
Came from the same project and is objectively less interesting unless the Lambo badge gives you a hard on (it does give me one but not as much as the Moroder badge and certainly not enough to make me lust over cars like the Miura, just like the Ferrari badge isn't enough to make me like the 512BB and I'd rather have some Dinos than certain Ferraris)
>but anyhoo Ill try your 80s one simply because the 80s are my least favourite decade for cars
Jesus
>and will be more of a challenge (unless I use RUF and Porsche for all the years)
So you're the guy saying RUFs aren't Porsches? lol

>>16326062
>Never looked good

neither did the Cizeta

>Looks like a generic Le Mans racing car

yes thats what it is for the most part

>Jesus

the cars were ugly

80s was just a horrible time for car design

>So you're the guy saying RUFs aren't Porsches? lol

they arent

File: alfa_romeo_carabo_18.jpg (946KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

946KB, 1280x960px

>>16326052
BTW you've probably noticed by now that I have an unhealthy fixation with popup headlights.
Oh and on why I didn't pick the Jags, I find them kinda forgettable. I liked them back in the day when they were the newest thing and the XJ220 held the record, but in retrospective it looks kinda bland to me. The sharp designs of the 80s and early 90s hit me a lot harder on a visceral level. After all, I've always loved Bertone.
>>16326071
>neither did the Cizeta
yes it did :^)
>80s was just a horrible time for car design
let's just agree to disagree, best decade for me
>they arent
kek stay in denial

>>16326079
different vin
reengineered chassis
in house parts make up most of the car

but it looks like a Porsche so its a Porsche

your Cizeta is just a Diablo beaten with a retard stick

>>16326088
>different vin
Literally irrelevant, the VIN doesn't make the car
>reengineered chassis
Adding a cage and reducing weight is "reingeneering"? Would you say the Subaru Imprezas racing in rally aren't Subarus because they're heavily modified? Is the Hennessey not a Lotus? lol
>but it looks like a Porsche so its a Porsche
It doesn't just look like a Porsche, it's a tuned Porsche. Gemballa Avalanches and Mirages are Porsches too, and so are Koënig Specials Road Runners, Rinspeed R39s, etc. Tuned Porsches.
>your Cizeta is just a Diablo beaten with a retard stick
It's not, they just started from the same drawing board.
According to your logic, a Peugeot 605 and an Alfa 164 are the same car, lel.

File: CC-P80-058-duo.jpg (121KB, 787x608px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 787x608px

>>16326105
Forgot pic

>>16326105
>Literally irrelevant, the VIN doesn't make the car

the VIN is the car

>Adding a cage and reducing weight is "reingeneering"?

yeah making your own chassis or heavily modifying one is the same as lowering weight and adding a cage

nice to know

> it's a tuned Porsche.

pro tip there are 2 different kinds of RUFS

the converted Porsche (which retains the Porsche vin) or their own handbuilt models started on a blank Porsche chassis (RUF)

>they just started from the same drawing board.

going by your own logic then they are Diablos

File: V16T chassis.jpg (57KB, 320x176px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 320x176px

>>16326117
It's better to leave blank space than to stretch the pics bro
>>16326127
>the VIN is the car
lol no
>yeah making your own chassis or heavily modifying one is the same as lowering weight and adding a cage
that's literally what they did lol, replace parts with carbon fiber and stuff like that
>their own handbuilt models started on a blank Porsche chassis (RUF)
Sounds like marketing BS
>going by your own logic then they are Diablos
How so? It's not "hand built on a blank Lamborghini chassis", it's built from scratch. The Cizeta is all that the Diablo should have been had the suits from Chrysler not interfered for considering the design to be too edgy.

File: ruf-ctr3-live-in-geneva-2012-4.jpg (472KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

472KB, 1280x853px

>>16326147
>lol no

lol yes

>that's literally what they did lol

no

do you even know anything about RUF cuz it doesnt seem like it

>Sounds like marketing BS

sounds like your grasping lmao

>The Cizeta is all that the Diablo should have been

a Diablo with retarded headlights?

>>16326147

more compressing then stretching. but i know what you mean senpai

File: ABWBlOGb.jpg (115KB, 705x800px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 705x800px

>>16326164
If I change a car's vin, does it become a different car suddenly? lol
>no
>do you even know anything about RUF cuz it doesnt seem like it
That's a CTR 3, not a CTR. And by the way, the chassis is only modified from the rear seat to the back. And the engine is a Porsche engine.
>sounds like your grasping lmao
Explain what a "blank Porsche chassis" means then, because all I see is that they retain most of the stuff from the original and improve it. The only examples with bespoke engines, for example, were prototypes.
>a Diablo with retarded headlights?
The design is much better beyond just the headlights. It's more angular. It's untamed Gandini.
From the top:
>first prototype that looked like the Cizeta
>second prototype
>final Diablo
>Cizeta-Moroder V16T

File: garage.jpg (1MB, 2452x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2452x2160px

>>16320530
Didn't have a clue about pre WW2, so went with what Cord.

File: RUF Visit 020a1059903757.jpg (37KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 800x600px

>>16326212
its literally a Diablo with an ugly bodykit

who cares
this is about how much Porsche is in a RUF other than the engine block and maybe some other small shit

they show up looking like that (except in white and no primed)

there are no vins

they develop everything in house and all the shit is handmade

guess what anon its titled as a RUF its a RUF

>>16326263
Meh, CKD Porsches

File: 2008-porsche-ruf-ctr3.jpg (225KB, 800x441px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 800x441px

>>16326263
You know what? I informed myself on modern RUFs. I stand by my words that the CTR was just a modified Porsche, but the CTR3 is more than just that. And I dig it. Incredibly sexy, BTW. Take that from a guy that doesn't go crazy about watercooled Porsches except for the Carrera GT.

>>16326528
nice 2007 Cayman bro

>>16325741
that's Dawn, not Phantom

>>16326528
Just looked this thing up. Its $510,000!! Why would you spend that much on a heavily modified Cayman and not a CGT?

>>16325741
>lol SX4
What's wrong with the SX4?

File: 01111_fDzb1AlKlFF_600x450.jpg (58KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 600x450px

>>16322607
>posting gen 1 Camaro
MAH NIGGA
10/10 taste

File: libertyRUFwalk.png (652KB, 888x496px) Image search: [Google]

652KB, 888x496px

>>16326263
Look what they have done to this once beautiful 911. They have bought it an off coloured liberty walk bodykit and riveted it on. Sacrilege!

>>16324565
>Chrysler turbine car

Saw that thing in person. I've never been more erect.

>>16327365
It's closer to a 911 than to a Cayman in many aspects tbqh

File: o.jpg (1MB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2400x2100px

>>16325698
Will go with the first car that came in mind for the 40s.

>>16326528
>>16327381
Unfortunately there isn't a single RUF that I could find attractive.

File: 4564646456.png (4MB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2400x2100px

>>16320530

File: IMG_4207.jpg (159KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 640x640px

>>16320530
On mobile and template wouldn't work so made shitty shoop with a collage app I found
>39 Delahaye Type 165 Cabriolet
>40 Mercedes Benz 770k
>50s caddy in general
>63 1/2 Ford Galaxie
>74 Lamborghini Countach
>88 S13 Silvia
>90 Mercedes Benz Evo 2
>04 BMW M3
>16 Subaru Levorg GT-S Spec.B in manual (although not possible)
I wish they'd bring them to the US in manuals

>>16328750 >>16322409

File: mp1.jpg (126KB, 500x350px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 500x350px

>>16328750
I actually met the owner of that Delahaye a few years before he died. I remember him telling me that he saw it at a car show when he was young, and managed to make enough money from dealerships to buy it in the 60s. Interesting guy.

>>16328299
I kinda like the CTR3 with its "Cayman GT" look, but I don't like the previous stuff they've done (can't really tell them from regular Porsches except for the color either)

>>16328833
Not him but the original countachposter, the one he posted could well be a '78 LP400S

>>16328871
>diesel 1.3L fiat
mjet pls

File: fiat-multipla-186-[2308].jpg (154KB, 1280x920px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1280x920px

>>16322998
>>16323839
>>16324845
>Avantime
Probably, the ugliest car, after fiat multipla off course.

>>16329255
I always confuse it with the Cadillac V16 Hartmann Roadster, kek

File: ayy_lmao.png (2MB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1600x1200px

>>16329458
Fixed it

>>16329448
Guess I'm not a Countach expert. My bad.

>>16324845
>3.0 V6
>comfy like a GT car, but more spacious
>absolutely unique
>rare
>it's a minivan with pillarless windows
what's not to like?

>>16328871
>Thesis
my dick is hard

File: lancia-thesis-06.jpg (411KB, 1968x1089px) Image search: [Google]

411KB, 1968x1089px

>>16330115
It was well ahead of Bentley and Rolls, shame about that front though.

>>16331397
yeah the front looks disgusting but i like the car and absolutely love the back end wich is kinda cadillacish so it makes my dick hard of course

File: rolls-royce-phantom-4_0.jpg (78KB, 900x596px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 900x596px

>>16332623
>kinda cadillacish
I find it Rolls Royceish, ahead of them as I said. Maybe I should have said the new Rolls and Bentleys are Lanciaish actually, since in 2001 they were making embarrassing old looking trash. Their fronts are still embarrassing nowadays though. I get that they made classy stuff back in the day, but they've fallen into noveau-riche levels of classlessness. They still have the luxury, but they come across as flashy and tacky.

>>16334021
Patrish. What is that 1990s Porsche though?

>>16334201
Looks like a 911.

>>16334201
930 slant nose

>>16336787
dude its obviously a 964 Flachbau

930s werent even made in 90s

File: 1481760294055.jpg (2MB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2400x2100px

>>16320530

>>16336801
Thanks bro that's all I needed to know, you're the real MVP here

>>16336834
Although I picked different cars for almost every decade I must admit I can't really disagree with any of your choices, absolutely patrician.

File: My Garage.jpg (2MB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2400x2100px

>>16320530

>>16323176
beat me to it hahaha

>>16323176
lol is that you Max?

File: Untitled.png (492KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

492KB, 800x450px

>>16337163
>1970s
Why did you chose that picture?

>>16339017
Probably because he fancies Ladas and has never been in one. The Niva is a dream truck of myself for example.

File: 1476330912655.png (3MB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1600x1200px

>>16329522
Fixed it

>>16339782
ahahahaha, 10/10

>>16320738
>not the 993

One job

>>16340666
Fuk off, satan wannabe.

>>16328299
964 is my dream daily.

>>16340696
>Fuk off, satan wannabe.
kek
>>16340666
993 is ugly af
the only thing it has going for it is that it's aircooled

File: 964turbospeedster.jpg~original.jpg (52KB, 600x399px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 600x399px

>>16340666
I will gladly take a turbo bodied Speedster over that any day

993 is my least favorite air cooled

>>16341220
>993 is my least favorite air cooled
At least I'm not the only one.
For me the 964 is the last air cooled 911 and the 996 might be just the last 911. 991's are nice GT cars but I'm not into them as much.

>>16339692
It's not a truck for starters. But why Niva?

>>16341390
Because it has great offroad capabilities and I love its look. Also how is it not a truck?

>>16341396
Because we don't call them like that here in EU.
Have you ever driven one? It's not even the best soviet offroader.

>>16341417
>Because we don't call them like that here in EU.
Well, pretty sure that SUVs are classified as light trucks everywhere
>Have you ever driven one?
Sadly not
>It's not even the best soviet offroader
But it's an offroader I can get in good condition unlike the UAZ 469 which I can only get badly beat up from the army. Also I'd buy a post-soviet version if I was going to buy one. Can't afford any right now as I'm in college and without a job.

File: 35-C-15-CAISSE-20M3-HAYON-1950000-EUR-TVA-v3a9wq6t.jpg (32KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 640x480px

>>16341440
This is what I'm imagining when thinking about ''light trucks''.
>Sadly not
Oh dear.
And what would you do if (when) the Ņiva won't be in a good condition anymore?

>>16341518
>And what would you do if (when) the Ņiva won't be in a good condition anymore?
Scrap it, I guess. Anyways Nivas are always half broken, never broken down :^)

>>16341538
You'd be scraping one every year? You'd be fucked with a car like that if you don't know how to work on it. I live in one of the most developed post soviet countries next to Russia and I can't remember the last time I saw a Ņiva. It might be because they aren't reliable cars and people also appreciate comfort. ..like a properly working heater in winter time. It's the same Lada with some ground clearance.

>>16341581
>live in one of the most developed post soviet countries next to Russia
Slovakia?
Also the only complaints I've heard about them are harsh ride, road noise and bad mileage. And you can see a lot of them doing just nice around here. We used to assemble them in the early 2000s (as Bognor Diva).

>>16341635
>Slovakia?
No.
Yet you still are dreaming about it?
I looked up craigslists and now I'm thinking about geting 70's 2101 (or 1111?). It might be ''my summer car''.

File: 1481760294055.png (4MB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2400x2100px

Took a lot longer than I thought it would. I tried to pick cars that were slightly more reasonable to own, instead of exotics, hyper cars, etc. Still some holy grails.

>>16341687
I like your 40's pick. I might swich mine to that.

>>16341682
I also romanticize spartanness in an almost masochistic way, I love the F40 for that same reason (plus all the benefits of a supercar of course)

Pre-WWII: Dunno, honestly
40s: Tucker
50s: Again, dunno
60s: Ford GT40 RaceCar
70s: Challenger PooPoo Pack
80s: Buick GNX
90s: Acura NSX
00s: E46 M3
10s: 911 4.0 RS

>>16328299
>>16341922
>60's
I love fastbacks

>>16322607
>50's: 1957 Plymouth Fury Christine replica\
Christine was a 1958.

File: Lenny_face.png (41KB, 581x263px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 581x263px

>>16341949
Perhaps they used a 1957 to make the replica

>>16320873
>E30
>miata
>I'm not gay!

>>16341949
no. She was a 1957. All the movie cars were 57's.
King din't know what he was doing with Christine. The book was originally supposed to be a time travel book where she would transport the drive and passengers back in time as her odometer rolled backwords. He also started writing Christine in the middle, originally envisioning her as a 1957 Chevrolet Bel Air. clues she was supposed to be a Bel Air are in the book.
In the book, she had :
4 doors (not available on Fury's until 1959)
a hydramatic transmission (GM's automatic transmission. Chrysler's was called Torqueflyte.
A gear shifter lever (automatic Chrysler products of the time had push button transmissions)
was red with a white top (while this color combo was available on the Bel Air, it was not available on the Fury, which was only available in Buckskin Beige with gold trim. This is referenced in the very first scene of the movie, though the book states she was a special order car so that may be explainable.

The switch to a Fury was a last minute change because the car's name suited the story better. Because of all this, I prefer the movie to the book because it's more accurate, even if the book was gorier.

>>16324846
I will admit, the only person I know irl with an Audi TT is homo as fuck.

>>16342478
You're the only one here concerned about sexuality, might be time to come out of the closet

>>16342450
BTW, that's not a replica. That picture is an actual movie car. Stunt car number 3, the car that chased down Moochie Welch, and was the only movie car equipped with a 3 speed manual "3 on the tree" style transmission. It's also one of only 2 or 3 cars to survive the movie's filming out of a total of 24 cars
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYDfCYt-oLA

>>16342493
The movie used both 1957 and 1958 model Plymouth Belvedere's and Savoy's since they couldn't get ahold of actual Fury's, then dressed up all the cars to look like 1957 models.

File: jPNKUXo.png (337KB, 426x504px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 426x504px

>>16326225
>Eagle
MY NIGGER

>>16342543
this desu
Miata looks feminine AF tho
>>16342478
>E30
>gay
top kek, last manly 3 series

>>16339692

This Lada (2105) is the first car I've ever driven, actually. A person should never forget his first shitbox.

>>16344556
Oh, makes sense

>>16320712
literally my nigga

>>16344810
kek
the Jeep isn't too niggerish tho imo (not american, maybe it is and I don't know)

File: garage.jpg (1MB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2400x2100px

Tried to keep this realistic in terms of purchasing and running costs.

>>16320530

>i appreciate Oldtimers, but prefer the look and badassery of ratrods. and see myself rather drive around in a Battered and rusty or soon to be decomissioned oldtimer-turned ratrod than an actual oldtimer.

>>16344556
I asked about the picture not about your taste in cars. You should know that that's not a 70's model.

>>16345335
How would he know? It looked like you asked why he chose a lada

>>16345335

The first 2105's came out in 1979.

File: garage of james bondavich.jpg (219KB, 1420x620px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 1420x620px

>>16337163
>the one i drive on holidays, the other one at work in russia
I'm on to you, you spy.

>>16345383
Didn't it had four round headlights? My bad.

Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Grand Wagoneer
XJ
YJ
Nothing from the 10's cuz there's no good jeps

>>16344810
thanks man

>>16344855
well I'm from yurop so these jeep are rare and desirable becouse its a proper american car and you can find them for the good price in yurop, so for its definetlly not niggerish but I can understand americans with their point theyy can probably buy them for 400 buck but its a different sittuation ever here

>>16345451
Great taste even if it could have a bit more variety
also Jeep is from the 40s
>>16345827
I'm not sure he was including all the cars when he said "literally my nigga" though

>>16345859
yeah I know I would rather own a cadillac eldorado from the 90s or fleetwood brougham but, Jeep is easier to get so I included it in the picture anyway

>>16345868
Nah, you did well
XJ>Cadillac

>>16345876
i prefer the ZJ but i have to correct you somewhere Cadillac> basicly anything else

>>16345907
that's right in theory, but Cadillac isn't what it once was and has had hideous styling for decades now

File: $_27.jpg (1MB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2400x2100px

10's are hard but need an MR at least. Also the De Soto in patrol car livery

>>16346104
>40's
When was that car made?

>>16346190
Damn, I fucked up. Uhhhhhhjhhh.
FUCK I CAN'T THINK OF A 40'S VEHICLE EXCEPT A POWER WAGON

>>16346306
I had the same issue. I went with the Volvo 444

>>16346314
>444
So the swedes got some nice trips huh

File: IMG_0572.jpg (169KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 500x500px

>>16321366
Akina speed stars would be verry pleased.

File: mazda.png (3MB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2400x2100px

>>16320530

File: 1481760294055.jpg (586KB, 2400x2100px) Image search: [Google]

586KB, 2400x2100px

That was easy.

>>16350018
kek

File: 141454036263.jpg (33KB, 251x251px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 251x251px

>>16350018
not even a Ford man but

>mfw

We need a new bread

>>16350047
NEW BREAD: >>16350675

>>16327366
meh nothing really. Decent little car. Just not what I'd pick as my "car of the decade" by any means.