How do you save Mitsu?
>>16281750
you don't. I bet they're still making good money off of appliances
>>16281750
let renault/nissan do their magic
>>16281750
Make new vehicles. The whole of the current lineup handles poorly and is years behind the rest of the market in terms of just about everything. They have great warranty, great customer service, great everything else except all their cars are gutless shitboxes with cheap and ugly interiors.
I would bring back the eclipse using whatever evo parts are left over for it.
>>16281809
everyone always said "bring back the eclipse!"
There's something you morons always overlook. The Eclipse was based on another car, and no, it wasn't based on the Lancer. The Eclipse was based on the 4 door sedan killed off at the same time.
"We need a new Eclipse!"
How about starting with a good new Galant first and then work on an Eclipse.
>>16281750
b-but i love my mitsu
>>16281829
What you're saying makes sense. Thanks. I'd support a new Galant, especially if they ended the Lancer and made an Evo version of it
>>16281965
Whoa, where do you live? Wish we got that in NA.
>>16281829
What if they brought bact the galant vr4 with nissan's variable compression engime
update:
lancer
pajero,keep it as it as mechanically,proper AWD,the couple of v6s and diesel options,add a bigger v6 or a small v8 maybe?more importantly,try and keep a slight glimpse of the older design language
tldr upmarket attempt while preferably staying NA
reboot:
galant
pajero evo
evo,add a hatch or compact variant
gt3000 vr4 as a cheaper alternative to a gtr,name it gto like it was named in nippon,no mitsu badges on it at all,gto all around
>>16281991
not him, but it's Poland