Meet the new 2017 Suzuki Ignis.

>>16270949

Suzuki makes EXTREMELY lightweight cars for their class so I'm OK with this. Looks cool too.

File: Suzuki-Ignis-2017-1280-12.jpg (745KB, 2522x952px) Image search: [Google]

745KB, 2522x952px

The standard SZ3 model gets six airbags, air conditioning, DAB radio with Bluetooth, 15-inch wheels, body coloured door mirrors, front electric windows and five seat capacity.

The SZT gets the satellite navigation, rear view camera, 16-inch alloy wheels, roof rails, wheel arch extensions and four seat capacity with individually sliding rear seats.

The SZ5 adds auto air conditioning, Dual Camera Brake Support, keyless entry and start, rear electric windows, LED Headlghts with DRL and front foglamps.

It has a 1.2L dualjet Engine.
>Fuel injected.

>>16270949
Ayyy
I was wondering if you would be back. I enjoy these

>>16270958
>Fuel injected
wow stop the presses

File: Suzuki-Ignis-2017-1280-48.jpg (264KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 1280x960px

>>16270958
There is also a hybrid system in this car and it seems rather complicated so here's the full explanation.

"Available on the SZ5 manual model, the SHVS mild hybrid is a compact and lightweight unit that incorporates an Integrated Starter Generator (known as ISG) which acts as both a generator and starter motor, the ISG is belt driven and assists the engine during vehicle take off and acceleration and also generates electricity through regenerative braking.

The SHVS system only uses its conventional engine starter motor when first started from cold, under all other conditions it uses the ISG unit to allow smooth and quiet engine restarts.

The energy assistance provided during acceleration enables the SHVS to be known as a mild hybrid system which is ideally suited to a compact car and adds just 6.2kg to the overall weight. In the new Suzuki Ignis the SHVS system helps Suzuki reach a top class CO2 emissions figure of 97g/km plus achieve a fuel consumption figure of 65.7mpg on the EC combined cycle for the 2WD model."

>Ditching the rear driven wheels and the hybrid’s power system brings the weight of the Ignis down from a hardly portly 920kg to a seriously impressive 855kg.

Based Suzuki

File: Koengisegg_Regera_front_moretwist.jpg (745KB, 3072x2160px) Image search: [Google]

745KB, 3072x2160px

>>16270970
>he SHVS mild hybrid is a compact and lightweight unit that incorporates an Integrated Starter Generator (known as ISG) which acts as both a generator and starter motor, the ISG is belt driven and assists the engine during vehicle take off and acceleration and also generates electricity through regenerative braking.
so it's basically pic related

File: image.jpg (71KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 640x480px

Looks like a cervo

File: Suzuki-Ignis-2017-1024-4c.jpg (95KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 1024x768px

>>16270960
Thanks bud :)

Fun Fact : It has a safety feature that utilizes it's two cameras underneath the side mirrors and it makes the car stop by itself when it detects that it's nearing an object dangerously closer.

The same both cameras also reads road signs, road lanes and fucking shit.

Look pic for explanation.

>>16270973
>AWD car that still weighs less than 1000kg
Impressive. Sure, it's absolutely tiny, but I have no problem with tiny lightweight AWD cars.

File: Suzuki-Ignis-2017-1280-16.jpg (215KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 1280x960px

>>16270986
I felt that too!

>>16270983
>Suzuki built a mini-Regera
Fukken sweet.

File: 51011114409491600x1060_0.jpg (122KB, 900x596px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 900x596px

>>16270992
tiny AWD cars have a special place in my heart

File: Suzuki-Ignis-2017-1600-2a.jpg (289KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 1600x1200px

>>16270997
AND HERE's THE INTERIOR!

>>16270949
Looks cool at the front, back is sort of hideous. Really cool that its so light.

>they actually prioritized this trash over an updated Jimny
S U Z U C U C K
U
Z
U
C
U
C
K

>>16271005
>simple
>clean
>ipad stuck to the dash
...God damn it, everything was going so well.

>>16270949
Sort of offtopic but is the Suzuki Swift any good? Theres a few of them for under 3000€ here and they look decent.

>>16271014
Yes. Especially the Sport is a great little car.

>>16271007
I'm not going to be surprised if the Jimny goes out the same way the Land Rover Defender has gone and the G-Wagon is going to go

EU is getting bitchy with cars being grandfathered and not going through modern pedestrian crash testing

>>16271014
The Sport is a very nice warm hatch

File: Suzuki-Ignis-2017-1280-1c.jpg (305KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

305KB, 1280x960px

>>16270949
Just to add a fact. Although already said by an anon here.

The kerb wight on the Ignis can vary from 880kgs – 920kgs depending upon the options you chose.

>>16270949
I actually kind off want it now. Also OP these threads are great. Keep it coming!

>>16271048
As long as I'm here. :D

>>16270983
Holy shit that is frickin cool.

>>16271021
>>16271027
Does have a bad rep though. Ive gotten lots of "granny car" comments from friends that ive asked the same question.

Rebirth of the samurai and tracker?

>>16271115
I wouldn't say so, and I live in a town that has the 27th highest average age in the UK

Looks like it would be cool as fuck with 20" wheels and a few more inches of ground clearance.
Those rear blindspots seem pretty bad though.

Over all pretty cool. Remove the rear seats and it would be an awesome road trip vehicle.

>>16270997
Holy shit do I see live axle there?

File: swift 4x4.jpg (281KB, 1280x852px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 1280x852px

Yes, I call it an SUV because it is available with an AWD system.

If that is your standard well this would actually the smallest suzuki SUV

http://www.suzuki.co.uk/cars/cars/new/swift/swift/swift-4x4

Note the rear diff.

We actually have a couple of these, civic 4x4s and so on in my country.

>>16270955
>EXTREMELY lightweight for their class
>SX4 4WD
>2990lbs

Sure

>>16271318
I'm not sure why it needs 4x4
The UK doesn't really get much snow and I doubt that they're marketing that towards off-road enthusiasts

I guess it might be appealing if you live in the Lake District or somewhere high up and you get a lot of snow but don't want to drive a big car

>>16271318

My mistake actually. The ignis is shorter by 100mm and thinner by 5mm

It looks cool but I doubt this means that Suzuki is going to re-enter the American automotive market with this.

>>16271369
Probably not. Maybe Chevy will sell an uglier reskin of it though.

File: 1423825134785.jpg (408KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 1000x750px

The rear looks like it comes rear-ended from the factory.

>>16271369
Hopefully they'll bring it here. I'm tired of seeing 20 million Jeep Renegaydes running around every day

>>16271318
With the diff placed that low, it seems very useless.

>>16271115
I had a 2007 Swift and the transmission went to shit at 120k km. Don't do it.

>>16271007
Why change what is perfect?

>>16271139
>Looks like it would be cool as fuck with 20" wheels and a few more inches of ground clearance.
lmao you want to donk a suzuki? wtf is wrong with you

>>16271532
No I want something that can handle driving down a trail without bottoming out.

File: HEROESRACINGCX2MESH 5.jpg (547KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

547KB, 1024x683px

>>16271139
>Not putting jatanabes or japanese vintage aero wheels

What is wrong with you.

Suzuki a CUTE.

>>16271556
*watanabes

>>16271544
20s will never fit with those wheel wells

>>16271544
>20" wheels
>on a trail

nigga, what?

Are Suzuki and Mazda the only good manufacturers left?

>>16270949
>>16270958
Why does this look better than the abortion that everyone else is putting out in the small car market?

>>16271563
Suzuki a SHIT.

File: 85_renaulttwingo[1].jpg (364KB, 1700x1132px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 1700x1132px

>>16271576

Its actually a small car and no progressive design faggotry.

Rear engine Twingo is pretty nice too.

>>16271598
no, look at those fucking proportions. its utter shit.

remember when wheel arches went all the way to the top?

>shitty car looks gay af
>/o/ goes crazy over it
Figures

File: image.jpg (84KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1024x768px

>>16271563
yeah!

File: 2016-12-05_210544.jpg (381KB, 1700x1132px) Image search: [Google]

381KB, 1700x1132px

>>16271598

It's way too fucking tall.

Would look so cute as planted as fuck little shitbox.


9001 hours in MS Pain

>>16271880
Not gonna lie, I'd drive the fuck out of that.

>>16270958
>>16270949
FUCK YEAH SUZUKI

>>16271887
me too, especially with the rear engine+rwd setup.
on top 10k price tag when new.

File: toyota birth defect.jpg (38KB, 412x897px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 412x897px

>>16271880
Not feeling Renaults cleft lip design. Toyota also stole that cleft lip design from them presumably because it was the worst design they could find at the time

>>16271013
At least it has buttons.

who the actual fuck cares about Suzuki other than squids?

>>16271996
Everyone who isn't a fag.
t; not you

is this new samurai?

File: 1459097004006s.jpg (9KB, 200x236px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 200x236px

>>16272076

Probably not. Would be a financial disaster since merchants fear them

>>16271478

The leading arms are actually lower.

It is not that much less ground clearance than you average cross over. Park up a Kia Sportage next to it and you wonder why you would ever bother with the Kia aside from the "look".

Not that I am defending it for my interests but they do have their niche in really snowy areas with high traffic that turns snow into mush.

>>16271337

>The UK doesn't really get much snow

There are other places in the world. Note that in the photo it is not even right hand drive.

File: TheJewsFearTheSamurai.png (180KB, 600x329px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 600x329px

>>16272081

>>16272152
I didn't even look at the picture, I just looked at the link and assumed you were a Bong like me

>>16271701
You're just mad the suzuki is stylish AF.

>>16272164

I didn't even look at the link myself. Didn't know it was a UK site.

I want Suckisucki to succeed and become a big player.
Would be a nice change.

Suzuki is truly the small car company.
If they make a little offroad oriented vehicle it can actually do so

>>16274064
They used to advertise this way in Australia in case anyone is wondering.
Google has no answers surprisingly. It's uncool to call yourself the "small car company" everywhere else seemingly

File: IMG_20161114_215640.jpg (1MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1536px

>>16270949
Meh, it's not a Jimny. I wish they'd bring the Jimny to the USA, then I'd replace pic related.

File: suzuki_x_lander_3.jpg (301KB, 960x768px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 960x768px

>>16272076
Got u senpai

>>16270997
this looks like it was made in 2000s from the back

>>16270989
Most new cars have this.

>>16270958
You can get most of those in a fucking luxury car and this all seems for a stupid low price. I think Suzuki is offering a great value here.

>>16274364

You have the samurai. Which is a Jimny. Just not a recent model.

>>16274544

>X lander

Everytime I see that shit I always forget that Americans call an "xx (ecks) a "cross"

>>16276264
ive never heard anyone do that

t. burger