>sedan
i dare you to try and sit in the back of one of these if you are over 6 foot. manlets need not apply, this car is trash
>>16268096
Not really that bad desu. However the 320i engine is hilariously underpowered and the interiors don't really stand out too much from much of the competition at this point.
>>16268096
Sitting in the back of sedans is for children and Uber riders
>>16268872
>the interiors don't really stand out too much from much of the competition at this point.
That's an understatement. Compared to the XE, A4/S4, C-class, and IS, the 3 series interior is pretty bad. It's mostly black plastic.
>>16269441
I meant overstatement
https://www.google.com/amp/www.caranddriver.com/amp/reviews/2017-bmw-330i-automatic-tested-review?client=ms-android-verizon
Literally handles worse than a fwd Toyota shit box.
>>16268872
>However the 320i engine is hilariously underpowered
It has 185 bhp and hits 60 in 7.3 seconds. That is not "hilariously underpowered" don't be stupid
>>16270083
Not terrrible, but on the other hand thats the same horsepower and 0-60 as a base model accord
>>16270089
Oh it is no performance car, but it is far from underpowered. These figures aren't far off a Golf GTI.
>>16270129
GTI's are fun to drive though