What is the best new/barely used car I can buy for between 50 to 65k?
>>16239016
What are you after OP?
What features matter?
Daily Driver?
cayman? what currency?
>>16239042
Navigation, manual box, defrosters for snow days, the rest I don't care about.
DD but I only need 2 seats.
CIVIC TYPE R BEATS ALL
41k base
>>16239103
Cayman GTS
Jaguar F Type
Used M3/4/5
>>16239090
CAD but assume OP prices are in USD. Cars are typically 10% more or so up here.
gt350 ?
>>16239103
GT350(R), ZL1, M2
>>16239016
Pic related
Easy. GTR.
The answer is 911 and anyone who says otherwise is kidding themselves.
>>16239242
>nissan
>>16239306
911 is more than 65k...
>>16239242
>can't get a sub-70k GT-R that isn't 5+ years old and probably hooned to shit
>no manual option
>ugly
>this interior
Solid no on that one.
>>16239016
>spending that much money on a car
>>16239115
These are actually pretty sexy in person. Thought it was an S-Class coupe for a good 8 seconds.
>>16239115
I'd actually prefer the C Coupe to be lowered just a bit more.Not a lot, but enough to see less ground clearance on the back. OR add a custom rear bumper.
Idk man, its just that it looks too damn high on the back.
>>16239016
The fastest 997 911 in that price range.
65 volvo 240s
you know you want to
>>16239317
A slightly used 911 can easily be had for 65k or less.
>>16239329
>tach in the center
Beautiful. Based nissan
>>16239329
i dont even like gtr's but i think that interior looks pretty dope
>>16239115
This is a C-class? Wow, I actually really dig that
>>16239329
>'>this interior'
what about it? apart from being better than 95% of other cars
>>16239016
You'd be hard pressed to find a car that beats a Mustang GT for the price.
>>16242892
Too generic. Everyone has one.
>>16239115
My god this is ugly