Range Rover Sport general

>posting an empty range rover general thread AGAIN
more like funeral

>>16224506
Perfect vehicle

>>16224506
It looks like a giant egg, really no different than any other SUV that size

The range rover classic was the only good looking range rover

>>16224506
>tfw you drive the pervious generation

>>16225290
Pic?

>>16224506
I think they use an alternative version of this vehicle in Europe for police kinda like the Suburbans and Tahoes are used in the US.

>>16225624
you drive a last gen RR sport?

>>16225624
Rate my accurate review >>16226820

>>16226858
is it just a RR with gimped space and practicality in exchange for a lower MSRP

Generic of the most generic obnoxious city SUVs which is neither sporty or utilitarian. Also very unreliable

>>16226603
If by alternative you mean not a range rover then yeah

bump. considering a 2011 supercharged one owner sport model. talk me out of it.

File: 41674e7d2efaeb7782cc4e70039ec36d.jpg (251KB, 1600x1011px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 1600x1011px

>>16224506
irl it looks ugly, much more ugly than the previous generation

>implying anything owned by Tata is relevant

OP pic is just the Ford Explorer's ugly sister

File: IMG_7412.jpg (52KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 625x626px

>>16228902

>>16226844
Yes, actually.

File: Large-Image-optional_221.jpg (36KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 640x360px

Its literally nothing compared to the Vogue. The new Sport just looks like a buffed up Evoque, and the previous gen looked a lot better.

File: range rover evoque.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

Two door Evoque is pretty cool. I see them a lot around my neck of the woods.
I heard there was something questionable about where they're manufactured. Also only see women driving them for some reason.

>>16232114
Women drive them because theyre cars for women. Tiny crossovers are just up their alley.

>>16224506
Gross