Why wasn't the Lambo pickup a success?

>>16208723
It isn't a lambo if it doesn't have a giant, very visible engine in the back.

Bed was too small and you couldn't through load into the cabin because of the rake of windscreen.
Also no one wanted a $300k pick up truck

People were not satisfied with the turbo inline 4 2.0l under the tiny front hood.

>>16208777
Is that actually what's going on here

>>16208723
because they never made one

File: i002963.jpg (47KB, 915x498px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 915x498px

It couldn't accelerate fast enough to 88 miles per hour.

File: lambo-lm002-2015023.jpg (66KB, 900x596px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 900x596px

>>16209022
Que?

>>16209053
That's no more a pickup than a Honda Ridgeline or Chevy Avalanche is.

>>16208723
Because that's a shoop.

>>16208723
putting the engine in the roof rack thew off handling