Cylinders, displacement and turbos are nice and all. But small,

Spotted the poorfag that can't afford a V8

>>16208429
When did V8s get expensive?

>>16208447
When you pull up to the pump

>>16208498
Lol all modern V8s have the cylinder on demand shit so no, you aren't spending a ton more on gas

>>16208548
>not driving hard in your V8
Why not just get an I4?

>>16208575
>being 12
don't need to be scotty kilmer all the time

>>16208422

Small high-revving turbo 4 is the best option.

>>16208633
>buying a V8 and never putting your foot into it
Care to explain this?

>implying screaming I6s and V8s aren't better than cuck vacuum cleaner engines

File: 1479212149626.jpg (37KB, 604x450px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 604x450px

>>16208683
where did the s2000 touch you?

>>16208643
Are you just pretending to be retarded?

>>16208422
>implying that 4 bangers are the because that's the only shit OP can afford

>>16208422
>>16208429
>1905+111
>not in the V6 masterrace
it's ok you all will see the light someday

high revving anything is the best

low revving shit is horrible

American V8s are some of the worst to drive engines right behind diesel

File: _DSC3956_2000x1331.jpg (291KB, 2000x1331px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 2000x1331px

>>16208422
>not having a v10

>>16208762
Are you even a car enthusiast?

>>16209104
not him but you dont have to act like an immature fuccboi to be a car enthusiast

>>16208422
just wait till we have free valve conversion kits for high performance and historic cars


guys im not lieing when i say a free valve conversion WILL ALWAYS GAIN HP on any car

>>16208683
>he gleefully posted from the bus stop

>>16209101
What year?

>>16208422
>cylinders
What the fuck does an I4 have if there's no cylinders?

File: DSC03218cen.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>16208429
>>16208422
Why not both?

File: 2DC10B4B-4619-4042-9D78-2DDC673397A5_zpssd5ffrdn.jpg (141KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 1024x768px

>Not accepting the inline 5 as the master race engine
Come on now /o/

BRAP BRAP BRAP

>>16212439
Because it's a compromise between efficiency and power with the disadvantages of both and the advantages of neither. It's literally the .40S&W of engines.

I really want to like the 850 but the NA models are more sluggish than even an average 4banger while drinking about the same amount of gas if not more than a comparable v6 while not being as smooth.
They make more sense with the Turbo, but it begs the question of why not have a T4 instead.

>>16212525
stupid post

>>16209091
>he doesn't make peak power at 2000 rpm

>>16212749
Isn't piston stroke a major factor in rpm limit?

>>16208640

Second this. A little 1300cc 4-pot turbo going all the way to 8000rpm is amazeballs.