Noble M600

File: inside-crop-u2383.jpg (45KB, 466x292px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 466x292px

COMFY

You forgot the best part:
>zero electronic nannies to interfere with your fun

>costs more than $20k
>isn't as reliable as a Toyota Corolla
It's shit

File: noble (5).jpg (141KB, 960x636px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 960x636px

>>16198285
This too. I resonate with that so much.

>>16198279
They're expensive (low production) and unreliable (British and low production).

Yes I love them and think Noble is a great company, but they're not well known enough to be popular. Hopefully they will be sometime in the future, but they aren't now.

>>16198298
I wouldn't be too worried about the reliability, the v8 is developed by Yamaha and Volvo

File: q1_press_car_04_lg.jpg (233KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 800x600px

>>16198279
The new Noble is cool but if I was in the market for one I think I'd rather buy the Rossion version of the M400. Smaller, lighter, faster, comes in manual, almost certainly cheaper, etc.

>>16198793
I would.
>British engineering
>One even broke on Top Gear, so badly that they had to get Noble to bring another one

File: kerb.jpg (16KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 400x400px

>>16199025
That wasn't an M600 though

>>16198993

>comes in manual

For the last 6 years the M600 has only been available in manual

File: Yes it is you fucking retard.png (82KB, 1679x463px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1679x463px

>>16199044
>Filename

>>16199025
I believe Clarkson highly praised the M600 actually.