ITT : Factory Riced Up Cars

File: honda-civic-type-r-rear_2.jpg (67KB, 1013x675px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1013x675px

>>16192179
That's subtle compared to the Civic Type R

>>16192195
All functional.

>>16192179
Nah, that's a normal looking car.
>>16192185
H I D E O U S
>>16192195
wing makes me giggle but otherwise nice looking

>>16192185
>all these people complain about new type r rice.
>its less rice than last type r

Nothing here is riced, even the Civics rear wing is functional...

FWD cars need rear downforce as well to keep the back end stable and prevent sliding.

The only time its useless is in a drag, which who the fuck is going to drag a newer FWD car?

Dumb fucks.

Anything HSV

>>16192179
That looks nice though. And the 6 speed is bretty good to drive, very notchy shifter
10/10 would daily

>>16194596
The new gen civic looks shit in general.

File: VL-Walkinshaw-01.jpg (131KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 800x533px

>>16196613
U mad?

>>16192179
10/10. Subtle but there. Very clean.
>>16192185
6/10. Looks like it should be an awd small displacement V8 monster. And it's not.
>>16192195
9/10. The wing looks a little goofy but great otherwise and the wing is functional so only one point off
>>16197778
6/10. This car could be a 9 if you ditched those ridiculous side skirts and the bumped up hood. I quite like the front bumper and rear. Also needs a better color.

>>16194120
>>16197876
The wing is funny because it's just a tad too small. Honestly if you scaled up the wing by 25%-50% it would look much better.

File: haha faggot.png (221KB, 650x304px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 650x304px

>>16197778

File: 4hondacivictyper.jpg (212KB, 1752x1166px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 1752x1166px

>>16192185

And the production version didnt even look that good.