VW made a crossover that looks like an SUV but is based on the Golf platform. VW just earned my trust back and this maybe the next car I may buy.
>>16191731
It may look less exciting than a CX9 which is planned to buy before but this seems a better option because this has a V6 coming in it and the Mazda is an 4cyl.
>>16191736
What do you guys think about this car?
Honest opinions pls.
Its stupid, like all crossovers
>lifted golf for the price of proper big SUV
Why, OP?
>buying an heavier-underpowered-5cm-higher econobox (ie a crossover)
Are you a woman aged 20-35?
>>16191751
>>16191755
I mean why not?
It's a wagon!
>>16191759
Because it lacks the punch of room and prestige of big SUV, lacks the price/performance/joy ratio of little suvs like cx 3 and vitara turbo, but will be priced as supposed bag premium kek.
>I'm going to buy a golf
>But i want it to be slower, handle worse, use more fuel, be harder to park and cost more money to both purchase and insure
Literally kill yourself.
>>16191771
Nuh uh its a Crossover bro, not a stupid fagget old people SW.
And its better than a normal Crossover too its totally like a real SUV for young-ish people which Mercedes and BMW sell for €100k. Thats the reason it cost more than the Golf SW because it has real SUV components.
Its compete in the same market of with BMW X5 which is a real SUV and definitely not a crossover even though the X and 5 in the name is basically reference to it being a 5 Series Corssover
>>16191787
You best be trolling.
>>16191740
>What do you guys think about this car?
>Honest opinions pls.
It's ugly, stupid, unneeded, ugly, awful and ugly.
>>16191790
Why would I be trolling? Crossovers are no joke.
>>16191731
I actually like it a lot, if it drives anything like a tiguan but has a bit more space I'm all for it