Bought my first car. Polo 1.4 SE 75. I posted here a few days

>>16175785

Is that the exact car? Doesn't have an MOT - mot-history.net

Looks nice though, history doesn't show anything worrying. Maybe get the tracking done but that isn't expensive. Much nicer than a Corsa or a Fiesta, enjoy anon

File: 1476532297171.jpg (142KB, 782x366px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 782x366px

Polo mk3 1.0 Here
Loving it so Far.

>>16175800

Its not the exact car but same model and colour.

I got it for £2000. Had the cam belt and water pump replaced and oil and antifreeze changed as part of the deal. I'm going to get my mechanic to take a look this weekend but I'm hoping for no shocks. One lady owner etc, only done about 5-6k a year the past 5 years.

>>16175807

Stick the plate in to that website I posted, will show all advisories etc on past MOTs so you can see if anything has been ignored that is likely to give issues.

£2k for a low mileage Polo with a recent cam belt? Good purchase, you should get a lot of life out of that

>>16175785
>>16175802
>not buying a twingo

>>16175830

I have MOT history for it. It failed last time around due to handbrake efficiency issue, worn tyres and suspension arm bushes being worn. Previous fails were for minor shit like tyre wear, windscreen wipers and wrong coloured bulbs lol.

I'm no mechanic but appears to be in good nick. Its done just under 83,000 in almost 11 years. If it lasts me another 3 years I'll be more than happy.

>>16175845

Also, deteriorated brake hoses have been an advisory for some time but I will get my mechanic to sort those asap I think.

bumping my 'Eurocuck shitbox'

>>16175785
Is it a Mark 3? Those rust
>>16175802

>>16175841
I'm guessing OP is from the UK, they never got the 1st gen Twingo.

>>16175785
Wow good job, you bought a shit car!
Now go back to /b/, you don't belong here.

Post like these make me feel so grateful to live in America where I didn't have to drive a sub 2.0l piece of shit for a first car.

>1.4
So just as slow as your mates but more expensive to insure? You fucked up.

>>16176601

Mk 4 Facelift

>>16176629

Keep em comin

>>16176684
Are you so lazy that you need us to call your car shit? Literally just ask the nearest person what they think of it

Literally worse than mjet's >DIESEL FIAT, at least that thing had some torque.

>>16175785
it's 16v and 75 hp right? how heavy it is?

>>16175785
well done anon. safe driving to you.

File: vw-polo-12.jpg (253KB, 1500x971px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 1500x971px

>>16176684
>MK4 Facelift
Thank God, the older model with bug eyes is just ugly, what the hell where they thinking.

>>16177232
It was that awkward "let's put bugeyes on everything" period.

I think they're cute though.

File: mercedes-E-320-PRATA.jpg (56KB, 832x408px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 832x408px

>>16177245
Can't understand why it caught on, I think they are advanced ugly. E-Class is the living example of this.

>>16175785
Nice, i have the mk3 1.6. Good for a first car